village voice
RSS/Podcast feed for Village Voice News Status Ain't Hood
The All-Dirty Edition
Vlada Lounge
Enter to win a $50 gift certificate to Vlada Lounge!
Alice Smith
Enter to win tickets to see Alice Smith on Thursday, May 22nd at the Highline Ballroom!
SoHo Stroll 2008
Enter to win a SoHo Stroll 2008 broom signed by James Blunt and designed and decorated by the New York Academy of Art!
Elia Salon
Enter to Win A Hair Package Special by the BEST DOMINICAN SALON for you & a friend!
Lit Lounge
Enter for complimentary admission to see Power Solo from Denmark with Band Antenna, Sea That Dried Up, and Chem Trail at Lit Lounge!
United Artists
Enter to win a 90th Anniversary United Artists DVD prize package!
Iron & Silk
Enter to win 5 personal training sessions at Iron & Silk Fitness!

» La Daily Musto «

by Michael Musto | email: musto@villagevoice.com

Were the Glory Days Really That Good?

Posted by Michael Musto at 1:00 PM, April 24, 2008


Not as good as Gone With the Wind, but better than Mexican Spitfire

"Things used to be better" is the familiar cry of tired queens everywhere. And while it's true that, for example, New York was lovelier when you didn't have to wait for a table at Olive Garden—and in fact when you didn't HAVE an Olive Garden—I still think all the relentless misting over about the past can be quite delusional and tiresome.

The truth is, the past was every bit as shitty as the present is. They had good and bad, exciting and dull, just like now, only our rose-tinted glasses selectively wipe out anything unpleasant from our collective memory. People always say stuff like "Movies used to be way better," but the reality is that we mainly remember the good work from back then and that obscures a full understanding of the breadth of product there really was. Naturally, Leatherheads isn't as fine a work as, say, Gone With the Wind, but that's an unfair comparison whereas a more realistic person would say "Leatherheads is way better than Mexican Spitfire." Back in the supposed glory days, there were many low-budget stinkbombs perpetrated on the public just like now—we just don't bother to count them when waxing poetic about the past, even if they occasionally turn up on TCM. I'm far from a "glass half full" type of guy, but still, for survival's sake, I feel it's important to constantly remind myself of what's better about now. Otherwise, I'd go nuts remembering that I used to be swept into Studio 54 and now I'm waiting on line to get a panini.

So let me state one thing that's a WHOLE lot better now: Technology! Before e-mail, I had to type up every freaking freelance article and hand-deliver it to the publication like an unpaid messenger! If they wanted a rewrite, I had to bring it home, retype it, and bring it all the way back! And before cell phones, if you were stuck on, say, a dirt road in Conecticut needing a ride back to civilization, you'd, I don't know, DIE. Still think the past was better?

comments

In the old days, we didn't have your blog! The present rules!

Posted by: lala at April 24, 2008 2:03 PM

I enjoyed the past, but really dahling, once something is over -- an affair, a party, a good meal, a migraine, a broken heart -- it's over and who gives a rat's ass about yesterday. Even though I'm dead, I'm still a firm believer in the hope that the sun will come up tomorrow. And all that crap. God bless Michael Musto.

Posted by: The Late Tallulah Bankhead at April 24, 2008 3:15 PM

That's all very true. Although I'm only 19 I'm always one to say that 'back in the day kids had it much better'. I only say that because even when I was growing up in the early 90s we still played outside and we had awsome classic tv shows and movies, now it's all creepy shit on tv with flashing lights. Teenagers now seem like they don't have any good role models. Like girls are wearing g strings when they're only 12 or 13 now. My 17 year old brother even tags along in my rant lol. But it is true that we block out the bad stuff and only focus on the really sweet shit that stood out.

What's wrong with the Olive Garden!?!? Haha, I love that place, the best bread sticks in the world :)

Posted by: monica at April 24, 2008 3:17 PM

everything is ALWAYS better now now now now now!!!!

Posted by: lindsay l. at April 27, 2008 9:51 AM

Back in the days of Lupe Valez, Maria Montez, Mala Powers and that crowd, in the days of such 'gems' as "Devil Bat" and "Maisie", your admission price got you those movies *and* a first run feature, and more! Will free dishes be handed out at movies during the new Depression? Will they come with DVDs? Back then, black & white was a budgetary thing. Today it is allegedly "edgy". Today's B-level and lower films are marketed (& sold) to us as main features; the vast majority would have made people at Republic, Monogram, & PRC embarrassed. Few films are worth their price of admission today, but the consuming public been conditioned to have such low expectations.

Posted by: Xylol at April 28, 2008 10:07 PM

post a comment



Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)
 
update notifications

email

subscribe
unsubscribe

categories
PR (4)
TV (3)
art (1)
books (8)
celebs (13)
film (27)
gossip (2)
graft (2)
naked (2)
nightlife (17)
politics (10)
porn (2)
products (1)
quick Q&A (1)
scandal (2)
theater (17)
archive
May 2008 (12)
April 2008 (54)
March 2008 (71)
links
La Dolce Musto: the column

The Village Voice Ad Index
The Village Voice Summer Guide 2008

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Summer 2008 Education Supplement

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Spring Arts Supplement

» click here to see more...