It Looks Like People Are Eating a Lot of Wood Pulp These Days

Categories: Edible News, Marx

treeflickr.png
Ella's Dad/Flickr
Perhaps in part because we're usually too busy worrying about whether there's shit in our meat, most of us have never really paid attention to cellulose. But apparently, we should, because it's in a whole host of things we stuff down our gullets.

Cellulose, for the uninitiated or arborphobic, is minuscule pieces of wood pulp or plant fibers, and, as The Wall Street Journal reports, it's being used increasingly by the processed-food industry.

Why? Cellulose is used to thicken or stabilize foods, add fiber, and replace fat, and it can be substituted for flour and oil. The costs flour and oil are rising, consumers want to delude themselves with low- or nonfat foods that have a creamy texture, and people in China and India want to eat the same mass-produced crap that we do. The vice president of one company that manufactures hydrocolloids (the family of substances that includes cellulose) says that sales have increased 3 to 5 percent per year over the past decade.

And lest you think that organic-food manufacturers turn their genteel noses up at this sort of thing, think again: Organic Valley uses cellulose in its shredded cheese products, though the U.S. Department of Ag says that only powdered cellulose "in its least manipulated form" is allowed in foods displaying "organic" or "made with organic ingredients" labels.

Still, even the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which has, well, issues with the processed-food industry, doesn't seem too bothered about the whole thing: According to Michael Jacobson, the group's executive director, "Cellulose is cellulose," whether it comes from celery or shrubbery. Also, at least it's not melamine.


Have a tip or restaurant-related news? Send it to fork@villagevoice.com.

And follow us on Twitter: @ForkintheRoadVV.


My Voice Nation Help
1 comments
Dana Seilhan
Dana Seilhan

Well, naturally nobody is going to worry about this. The great myth is that meat-eating *requires* the destruction of forest when the truth is, you don't have to cut a lot of trees to raise food animals, but you *must* cut forest to raise most food *crops*, and if on top of that we will now be using wood cellulose in our foods as well, that's another way we will lose trees. I could see a scenario arising in which some idiot in some place of authority decides that we have a cellulose shortage, therefore we must develop more GMO trees to make up the shortfall. I'm waiting for them to get around to the Soylent Green--they've already got the "soy" part down and in everything. Pass me a steak, I'm sick of the Frankenplants.

From the Vault

 

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places New York

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city