Daily Voice «

update notifications

email

subscribe
unsubscribe

archive
July 2008 (36)
June 2008 (39)
May 2008 (31)
April 2008 (33)
March 2008 (28)

Test Tube Meat?

Posted by Sarah DiGregorio at 1:36 PM, April 15, 2008

dish.jpg

The first in-vitro meat symposium was held last week in Norway. Yes, in-vitro meat, as in meat grown in a lab, from cell culture.

That sounds pretty gross, but it's actually no more disgusting (and infinitely more humane) than many factory-farming practices.

Jason G. Matheny, of New Harvest, just got back from the symposium, and he agreed to answer all our burning questions about test tube meat.

"It should taste the same as regular ground meat..." after the jump.

How does growing meat in-vitro work?

Cultured meat is meat produced in vitro, in a cell culture, rather than from an animal. The production of cultured meat begins by taking a number of cells from a farm animal and proliferating them in a nutrient-rich medium. Cells are capable of multiplying so many times in culture that, in theory, a single cell could be used to produce enough meat to feed the global population for a year. After the cells are multiplied, they are attached to a sponge-like "scaffold" and soaked with nutrients. They may also be mechanically stretched to increase their size and protein content. The resulting cells can then be harvested, seasoned, cooked, and consumed as a boneless, processed meat, such as sausage, hamburger, or chicken nuggets.

How did the symposium go? Did you learn about anything new?

The meeting was very encouraging. The general consensus is that a ground meat product like sausage or hamburger is both technically and economically feasible in the near-term.

What were the big issues at the symposium this year?

One of the big challenges has been development of animal-free culture media and growth factors. There's been excellent research in this area recently, and it looks like this challenge can be solved in the near-term. Another issue at the symposium was economics. The consortium funded an independent economic assessment, which found that by adapting existing technologies, it should be possible to make a cultured meat product that's competitive with conventional meat.

I notice that many of your colleagues at the in-vitro meat association are European. Is Europe ahead of the US on this?

Yes, definitely. The Dutch government has shown unique foresight by funding research on cultured meat. It would be good for the US government to catch up. After all, in this country we've got more heart attacks, more water pollution, and more greenhouse gas emissions due to meat.

When will the technology be ready to produce in-vitro meat on a large scale?

Our guess is 5 to 10 years. This could likely be shortened by more energetic investment in research and development.

Why should we support in-vitro meat production?

Cultured meat could help solve a lot of global problems. Fatty meats are thought to cause two million deaths each year. With cultured meat, you could have a hamburger that has the fat profile of an avocado. Meat production is responsible for more greenhouse gases than the transportation sector. With cultured meat, you could reduce emissions to a fraction of what they are now. And with cultured meat, you wouldn't have problems like avian flu, Mad Cow, or the salmonella or campylobacter that contaminate our meat. Lastly, with cultured meat you wouldn't need to raise and kill 50 billion farm animals each year.

The most common objection I've heard to cultured meat is that it's unnatural. This is true, but it's also unnatural to raise tens of thousands of animals under a tin roof, doping them with antibiotics and growth promoters. That's what we do now. We can do much better. We already accept bioengineered products like yogurt, so I'm optimistic that consumers will accept cultured meat, particularly given its health benefits.

How does it taste?

It should taste the same as regular ground meat, as it's made of essentially the same material.

In theory, would you be able to grow anything from a porterhouse steak to a pork shoulder?

Growing whole pieces of meat, like steaks or drumsticks, is a much more difficult challenge. My guess is that's decades off. But half the meat we eat is ground meat, so we should start there.

Will you run into trouble with the American Cattlemen Association or other lobbying groups?

I haven't seen any statements from the livestock industry groups about this. Meat processors like Tyson should be in favor of any technology that helps their bottom line. In principle cultured meat could eventually be cheaper than traditional meat, since you can avoid losses due to animal disease, and integrate meat production from start to finish under one roof. But it's true that cultured meat would compete with large livestock producers.

How did you get interested in in-vitro meat?

I was working in India on a public health project and was surprised to see a trend toward the factory farming practices and meat consumption common in the U.S. It was clear that the problems we have with American meat production and consumption—pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, heart disease, food contamination, and poor animal welfare—are becoming global. Around the same time I had read about NASA research on cultured meat— meat produced in a cell culture rather than in an animal—to feed astronauts. It seemed like the technology would have more important applications feeding people on Earth.

more: news

comments

This is a great idea that promises not only to feed more people, but also reduce the animal cruelty and environmental degradation involved in factory farming.

Posted by: Paul at April 15, 2008 7:14 PM

If this becomes SOP for boneless meat products, what tactics do you suppose the Veganist Jihad will use to try and derail it, since their actual agenda has nothing whatsoever to do with "animal rights", and everything to do with eliminating human rights and terrorizing/legislatively forcing the entire planet to eat their non-nutritious, unhealthful, anemia-and-osteoporosis-causing, cow-fodder diet?

Posted by: BadKarma at April 16, 2008 12:12 PM

This sounds like an April Fools joke...maybe it should be. Please, let's get our animal protein needed for bodily functions the way God intended...from animals.

Posted by: Melissa Hart at April 17, 2008 1:38 PM

This is horrific! Think of the deaths with genetically altered corn that got into the human food chain. (the very corn we are feeding to cows) We are what we eat.

We should not play God with nature. The reason beef has become harmful is because we feed cows grain instead of grass - they are not designed to eat grain. With grass fed beef the fats created are omega 3. With grain fed beef 50% of the fat is saturated.

Posted by: Iris at April 18, 2008 2:02 PM

I did a paper on this for my english class and I thought it was an excellent idea. If we figure a way to create cheaper meat that can save the lives of hundreds of thousands of cows a year. Pollution from livestock attributes to around 18% of total pollution a year. That alone is reason enough to find a way to create meat another way. If the product was just as tasty and had no unhealthy side effects than why not give it a try!!

Posted by: Caleb at April 27, 2008 9:52 PM

yeah...but what do we do with all of the cows?

Posted by: at April 29, 2008 9:54 PM

Well "BadKarma," the world's largest group of nutritional scientists & consultants, the American Dietetic Assoc., contradicts your claims that veganism is not "nutritious" and causes "anemia" (www.dietitians.ca/news/downloads/vegetarian_position_paper_2003.pdf, which compiles more than 250 other peer-reviewed studies) and you'll find that vegetarians have less osteoporosis than the average American meat-eater, and vegans are about the same.

Kids raised vegan even have an average 19 extra points of I.Q. (JADA 1980; 76:142-7). Vegans and other vegetarians both live longer than the average American (Key TH, Thorogood M, Appleby PM, Burr ML. Dietary habits and mortality in 11,000 vegetarian and health conscious people: results of a 17-year follow up. BMJ. 1996;313:775-779). Vegans also suffer less from even NON-fatal maladies while alive, such as Alzheimer’s, IMPOTENCE :-) (the arteries in the penis as a network of many small-diameter ones, just like the coronaries), constipation, diabetes, and vegans have stronger immune systems overall (as my 1st link shows).

Also, most vegans I know support the "cell cultured meat" instead of trying to "derail" it as you suggest.

So to summarize, "BadKarma," take your disinformation which contradicts REAL nutritional science, and shove it up your polyp-covered large intestine. Go join GW Bush if you want to use false, anti-scientific propaganda.

Posted by: JHR at May 8, 2008 10:51 AM

post a comment



Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)
 
Three best things to do in New York on
Friday, July 25