Pazz & Jop 2011: Brad Nelson On Why Lou Reed And Metallica's Lulu Was 2011's Best Album

To supplement this year's Pazz & Jop launch, Sound of the City asked a few critics to expand on the reasonings behind their voting. Here, Brad Nelson talks about the much-discussed collaboration between Lou Reed and Metallica, Lulu, which topped his ballot and came in at No. 94 on the albums poll.

lulu_cover.jpg
In the video we see the four members of Metallica, in autonomous cars, approaching a warehouse in the Bay Area, where (this is the only real narrative to take from the video) Lou Reed is waiting. Lou approaches nothing; he has always been there, in front of a microphone, phasing out of shape. There is not much light but the few spotlights amplify beyond their scope, drawing implications into the face of Lars Ulrich, whose mouth diagonally frames his teeth, always, and the whole skull of James Hetfield, newly dynamic with mohawk. Kirk Hammett's guitar looks changed in the light, full of grain. They play. They play a lumbering riff, it seems pulled from a subspace. Gravity acts gently there, woozily. Lou speaks, barks, commanding something from afar. They all start to phase, faces play upon faces. Their images shake into each other, confuse features. They are completely fused in spirit. Lou rubs his eyes. Rob Truijillo tosses his long, weighty hair into glossy octagons of light.

This is the Darren Aronofsky-directed video for "The View," the ostensible single from the recorded exchange between Lou Reed and Metallica called Lulu. People treated Lulu supernaturally when news of it first appeared; when it was released it was the absurd, unapproachable record of the year, roundly panned, roundly existentially questioned. In the Quietus, Julian Marszalek wrote, "We have but a short period on this earth." It could not sustain Lulu, the indulgence of five men who had advanced into a totally sealed-off sphere. How much of what they did was metal? How much of it followed the track of the Velvet Underground, into an unforming rock? Most declared neither, that Lulu sounded as if two incomplete records had grafted intemperately to each other. I don't even totally have the words to process it now, even as it tops my Pazz and Jop ballot.

Nitsuh Abebe wrote that the album is "gorgeously recorded," and he's right. The guitars are baked in. The cymbals crash through what seems a completely round spectrum. Lou and James lean through the mix and into your personal space, creating a vaguely hostage-type situation. The album was mostly recorded live, as live as possible. Lou could see Lars and James and Kirk during recording, could react to and reinforce them, could pursue what he called in a GQ interview "leakage," "where Lou and Metallica would sit "in a big circle, sitting and playing," improvising.

But the effect of the finished mix is actually hyperdistinction. Lou sounds as if in a distant chamber from the band—the Voice's own Maura Johnston wrote that "oftentimes the collaborators sound almost deliberately out of sync, a jarringness that's heightened by Reed's vocals being so front-loaded in the mix." For all the potential dissonance, listening to Lulu is a totally lucid experience. The elements honeycomb into sense and meaning, albeit a sense and meaning that is unmistakably its own. You are never lost or unaware of what is happening—very little of Lulu is confusing or disorienting. The constituent parts are kind of unremarkable. There is Lou Reed. There is Metallica. There they are, combining. A few adjustments and you are there with them, purely receiving.

The template: One riff—which, for the most part, traces a previously unknowable middle between the bluesy lowing of Load and ReLoad and the recursive tangles of St. Anger—is decided upon and repeated until it is fabric, until it goes unnoticed. (See: "Mistress Dread," where thrash and drone meet.) Lou steps in to circle us back into the riff, as one might walk into a fence or brick wall. The lyrics are loudly sexual; they shift invisibly between the titular Lulu and the men she sleeps with, who obsess over her. Between the meanings, there are strange and novel combinations of words: "just-formed angel," "deepen a curtsy," "the brain that was once listening, now shoots out its tiresome message." The record works out its own syntax, resulting in a language of militaristic sexual desire—a sort of I-break-you-down-into-parts hegemony—as well as the unconscious form of it, its submerged tonalities.

My Voice Nation Help
10 comments
Jackie TheRepress
Jackie TheRepress

now guys, you had your chance with Lulu - you blew it... ;) the purpose of the video was not reached, so Mr. Director blew it also...  just listen to the Man once and for all (he knows just how bitches work): keep Alice in Wonderland and maybe, just maybe you will be cashing in...  but remember, St. Andrew is stronger than St. Anger! (I can't help wondering what will be its effect, taking into consideration that researching for Lulu led to you constantly thinking of her - emotional betrayal ;), the same way the poor impure souls in San Quentin were influenced by your music)

TanaNL
TanaNL

"His arms don't yield or snap like arms; they don't move through the air so much as phase in and out of gravity's pull. Physics work on him differently. They go variable. As much he is untroubled by groove, neither is he metronomic. He does not keep time because he is not a time keeper. He fills a necessary space—or, rather, he modifies the space itself until it is totally susceptible to his great insane crashing."I actually… didn't dislike Lulu, but passages like the above - which this post is full of - do nothing to persuade people to give it a listen.  "I don't even totally have the words to process it now," Brad Nelson writes, and that should have been his first best clue to stop right there.  When a critic has to disappear up his own ass and pull out hundreds or words nonsensical art-school prose in an attempt to "communicate" what appeals to him about an album (and still fails to do so), then forgive the reader for thinking the album is probably as full of bullshit as he is.

Volt Voort
Volt Voort

Sir, has anyone ever mentioned to you that you write wrong? All of your efforts strike me as the result of huffing Lemon Pledge with some sort of faulty thesaurus software application at hand. From the first sentence- the cars carrying members of Metallica were 'autonomous'- I began scratching my head, and soon enough my fingernail was scraping the skull. The cars were autonomous. They had no drivers? They possessed the ability to act and reason independently of human control? Nevertheless, I reckon I'm as much amused as troubled by your attempts; I'm reminded of one of Tinguely's ramshackle devices coming apart at the seams.

Alex
Alex

You either "get" this album or you don't. I think small, tighter then a fleas ass microscopic minds are incapable of "getting" this piece.Thanks for your perspective Brad. - Alex

M001
M001

I agree with you on many points as a long time Metallica fan and a Lou fan for even longer.  One thing I don't hear so much is the improvisational nature of the record.  It seems pretty tight to me.    

D. Strauss
D. Strauss

"...very little of Lulu is confusing or disorienting." Perhaps this is why so many of us think it doesn't work.

Brad Nelson
Brad Nelson

Sure! I'm not totally even making an argument here, just trying to figure out why it works for me.

6h057
6h057

I'm listening to Lulu for the first time because of this post.

My god have mercy on your soul.

Now Trending

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

New York Event Tickets
Loading...