Why Do Jam Bands Carry Such a Stigma?

Categories: Phish

jamband.jpg
Jam. Band. Apart, these two words are innocuous. Put them together, though, and for whatever reason they become instantly polarizing. Whenever the subject of jam bands comes up, it seems to send some people into a frenzy of dogmatic snideness. So why the stigma? Well, to answer that, we've probably got to go back to beginning.

See also: Eight Things You'll See and Hear At Phish's MSG Run

The Grateful Dead created the sound and were essentially the architects of the scene, and when Jerry Garcia died in 1995 a huge group of people were left wondering what was next. As a result, many bands gained new fans looking for other free-feeling live-music experiences, and by the end of the '90s, many jam bands were at the top of their game.

Bands like Phish, which had grown big enough to be playing large summer sheds, and groups like the Dave Matthews Band and Blues Traveler, which had tons of radio hits and went on huge tours of their own. Bell-bottoms and '70s fashions also enjoyed a resurgence, and kids all over the country were rocking hemp chokers and Birkenstocks, wishing they were older so they could have seen the Dead in their heyday. It was actually cool to listen to jam bands, for a minute there.

Fast-forward about a decade, and some jam bands have incorporated electronic music into their sound, staying up to date with what's going on in the music scene as a whole. Many have coined the sound as "jamtronica," a term meant to hold allegiance with the jam scene but nodding to the fact that it's something a little different now.

As more electronic-music listeners and a younger generation began listening to these jamtronica acts, there was a noticeable difference in the way the fans dressed. Neon dominated the apparel, along with anything else that lit up; the guy in patchwork pants and tie-dye now looked dated and corny at his own party.

But somewhere along the way, it was more than the look that began to be shunned; it was the whole jam-band scene that was being smirked at. People who saw Dave back in the day now laughed at the people who seemingly hadn't grown, who were still chasing the dream. The words "jam band" instantly evoked bad hippie clothes and other cringe-inducing things about the culture that should've been left in the past.

The problem with this sort of thinking is that the jam-band scene did evolve, and it's still bustling. There is no shortage of talented musicians who prefer to improvise on stage as they blend genres and take the audience and themselves on a total sensory experience. If you looked at a picture of the guys from Lotus, for instance, you would see that they dress more like a band from Brooklyn than a band from Woodstock.

My Voice Nation Help
6 comments
licoricelover
licoricelover

improvised noodly music is like licorice.  some people LOVE licorice, some people think its okay and some people absolutely detest even the sight of it.  Licorice lovers generally are too busy eating licorice to try and convert licorice haters.

louispomatico
louispomatico

Why is Stephen Malkmus and The National mentioned in a jam band story?  This article is very silly.

zacharyadamcohen
zacharyadamcohen

"chasing the dream" what dream is that? freedom,creativity, travel, communion, would be nice if the author explored that aspect as its crucial to this whole conversaiton 

Andrew Bowers
Andrew Bowers

Most anti-jam types I know have such a limited concept around what music is supposed to sound like that if a song is over 4 minutes long and doesn't have lyrics of poetic significance to them, they'll call it jam-crap. Plain old ignorance and bigotry.

Now Trending

New York Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...