Putting it diplomatically: No on Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State
Even in the most charitable light, Hillary's diplomatic skills are dim and dimmer. Never in her career has she built a consensus with her own hands or successfully worked out a major deal. She's even left a host of former allies — like children's advocate Marion Wright Edelman — disaffected and angry with her after they realized that she stood for nothing but herself.
Not that there's anything wrong with a politician doing that. Except when you consider that politician as a diplomat.
Not every pol can be an international diplomat. George W. Bush himself is the prime example. And though some political operatives can do it, Bush's handlers proved what a disaster that could be when they sent hardline polemicist John Bolton to the U.N. — one of the most ludicrous appointments in the history of U.S. diplomacy, because Bolton was an avowed foe of the very existence of the U.N.
Hillary is no polemicist. But she's no diplomat.
She isn't even a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Chuck Hegel is. So is Dick Lugar. Either of those serious, sober, centrist Republicans would be better choices for Obama, who himself was on the committee (as was Joe Biden).
The buzz about Obama's possible selection of Hillary smacks of little more than backdoor campaigning by her own people.
We're sorry that she's bored with her job as New York's junior senator. And we know that she'll be mortified at having to continue being the state's junior senator, because Chuck Schumer, the other N.Y. senator, is now one of the most powerful Democrats in D.C. — Chuck is chairman of the Joint Economic Committee and also controls the campaign treasure chest for fellow Democrats. Schumer won't be relinquishing his power for at least the next four years, unless the GOP seizes control of the Senate in 2010.
Give it up, Hillary. Go back to the Senate and do some work. You're a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Do us a favor. Try to beat some of our swords into ploughshares.
Or if you just want to sulk, at least browse these items . . .
NO PARTICULAR ORDER:
Wall Street Journal: 'Citi to Cut More Jobs,
Raise Rates on Its Plastic'
"Citigroup is embarking on another huge round of layoffs and is raising interest rates on millions of credit-card customers."
AllAfrica.com: 'Kenya: What the Global Left Can Learn From Obama's Victory'
N.Y. Daily News: 'Jennifer Aniston finally talks about Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt'
N.Y. Times: 'Chances Dwindle on Bailout Plan for Automakers'
Philadelphia Daily News: 'What's so funny about Obama? Comedians and musicians struggle to find material'
N.Y. Post: 'B'KLYN OFFICER SLAYS LUNATIC'
N.Y. Daily News: 'Mr. Bush, come tell the ghosts in Queens your financial plan'
Washington Post: 'In a First, Astronomers Report Viewing Planets of Other Suns'
New Yorker: 'The Joshua Generation: Race and the campaign of Barack Obama' (David Remnick)
Washington Post: 'CIA Director: Iraq Not Main Front in War on Terror'
Wall Street Journal: 'Treasury Draws Fire for Shift in Rescue'
"Lawmakers assailed Paulson over his handling of shifting TARP's focus, and raised questions about Treasury's plans for rescue funds."
Wall Street Journal: 'MGM Mirage CEO to Resign Amid Questions About MBA'
Salon: 'Awaiting Obama's top lieutenants'
"Will it be Chuck Hagel, or even Hillary Clinton, for secretary of state? Will Bob Gates stay at the Pentagon? Obama's national security team remains mostly top secret."
New Yorker: 'Emanuel In Full'