U.S. Dams Iraq While Damning Iowa
Desperately needed funds for new levees in U.S. Midwest have been diverted to flood control in Iraq.
How many more floods of Biblical proportions will it take for Americans to realize what the government is not doing?
The Bush regime and Congress have refused to spend money on upgrading levees in the U.S. while spending hundreds of millions of dollars on levees and dams in Iraq.
The first disaster was Hurricane Katrina. Now we have the Iowa floods, which will have even more impact worldwide because of their impact on food prices.
I thought Bush was a big Bible reader. So why is he ignoring prophecy about floods? The AP's Jim Salter reported on May 12 that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers didn't even know how many levees there were in the country, let alone the sad shape of them. Salter wrote:
Asked and answered when it comes to Iraq. The Bush regime diverted flood-control money from New Orleans to try to win the propaganda war in Iraq. (Go to this 2007 Bush Beat item for facts and links.)
Same situation in the Midwest. While the waters were still ominously rising last month, the AP's Salter wrote:
$200 million would pay off your mortgage, but it's really not that much money in the big picture. As I wrote in September 2005:
While the corpses of elderly people were floating and bloating in New Orleans in September '05, the Defense Department was also bragging on its "Defend America" website about spending money on Mosul Dam, the largest in Iraq, to keep floodwaters from potentially — potentially — flooding Baghdad:
Not that the Mosul Dam project worked out well, mind you. Two years after the DOD crowed about its work on the dam, Stuart Bowen, the courageous special inspector general in the Iraq Debacle, pointed to the facts, as NPR noted in October 2007:
For more, read this Washington Post story, which says in part:
Rather that a corrupt flood-control project be undertaken in this country instead of Iraq. At least it would have partially helped defend America.
From the Bush Beat