Mayor Bloomberg to Axe More Than 6,000 City Teachers

Mayor+Bloomberg.jpg
Mayor Mike Bloomberg is set to announce that he plans to eliminate 6,100 teaching positions from the city's schools -- that's one out of every 12 -- according to Mike Bloomberg's media company.

Bloomberg's Administration will layoff 4,666 teachers and lose another 1,500 to attrition. UFT President Michael Mulgrew -- who is vehemently opposed to the Mayor's plan to cut positions regardless of seniority -- says the city has already lost more than 5,000 teachers to attrition in the last two years.

Bloomberg News reports that the cuts to education come at a time of increasing tax revenue in the city, but a falling level of state and federal education aid.

Politico's lead cover story this morning lays out how teachers are under assault nationally like no time ever before. Traditionally, teachers have been able to consider Democrats staunch allies on issues of class size matters and saving tenure. But even President Obama (though his budget calls for more education spending overall), as well as Governor Cuomo, are talking tough to teachers right now. In the past few years, someone has stepped in to save teaching positions in New York before the pink slips took effect. It's not clear that will happen this time.


My Voice Nation Help
1 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Jjbpigglet
Jjbpigglet

I have my children in public school and I was lucky enough to know that the teacher that taught my older son 12 years ago was still around to teach my younger son. If Politicians really cared about the children that attend public schools their decisions on how to reform public education should not be a political one but one that will truly help our children get a good education. Not all parents can afford to pay for private schools. So we need the public schools to give our children the best education. Most Companies look for experienced workers; even restaurants prefer to hire experienced waiters or waitresses. But, when it comes to our children's education experience does not seem to be important, why? Everyone is blaming teachers but no one blames the Board of Education that is constantly changing programs or teaching philosophies. No one talks about the "whole language approach," that took phonics away and the results were that many children did not learn how to read. Teachers that wanted to teach phonics were either reprimanded, had a letter put on their file or a U rating. If teaching philosophies are constantly changing how will a teacher be rated as being an effective or ineffective teacher. If classrooms are being overcrowded and necessary resources are being taken away from schools how you can say a teacher is ineffective when she/he is not being supported and given the proper tools. If a carpenter is not given proper tools of course he will be an ineffective carpenter. The question being: Is an effective teacher based on a particular criteria or is it based on the philosophy of the month?

From the Vault

 

Loading...