This Week on the Gay Marriage Beat: Whoppers and Lies, Fence-sitting and Delays

gay-marriage-beat-logo.jpg
​A gay couple can have a whopper of a hard time just trying to order a sandwich at Burger King, let alone trying to obtain a license to get hitched.

Here are six more things you should know to keep it all straight.

1. House Speaker John Boehner has announced that a House-appointed attorney will defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) now that the Obama Administration is declining to do so. Representative Steve King of Iowa is proposing that the Department of Justice's budget should be slashed by as much as it would have spent defending DOMA.

2. Considering recent attempts in Iowa to roll back marriage equality, questions about gay marriage to Republican presidential candidates are about as expected as those about corn subsidies and ethanol. Donald Trump has indicated that he doesn't support same-sex couples to wed once, let alone three times like he has. Newt Gingrich (also thrice married and recently suspended from Fox News over his own Caucus dreams) thinks Obama could be impeached over his refusal to defend DOMA.

3. In Wyoming, a bill that would prevent the state from recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions is stalled in the state Senate. Last week, a more extreme constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage died in Wyoming's House.

4. Gay marriage equality once looked like a shoo-in in Maryland, after that state's Senate passed a bill that was expected to also pass in the overwhelmingly democratic House of Delegates and be signed by Governor Martin O'Malley. But the past seven days have been a rollercoaster, with one-time supporters waffling and pivotal votes deciding they'd be more comfortable with civil unions than marriage. At one point, it looked as if the bill might not even get out of the Judiciary Committee. But today, that body voted it out 12-10, and it goes to the full House for a vote next week. With the support of delegates once on the fence, its odds of passage are looking strong again. Joe My God notes that "among the failed GOP ploys were amendments allowing polygamous and incestuous marriages."

5. In California, the Prop 8 case Perry v. Schwarzenegger has taken more twists and turns than an explanation from anti-gay Reverend Grant Storms about why he was urinating (or was it masturbating?) into a bottle near a playground. Following the Obama administration's announcement that it won't defend DOMA, the plaintiffs in Perry asked the California Supreme Court to speed things up on the appeal of Judge Vaughn Walker's decision that Prop 8 was unconstitutional. (Oral arguments won't be heard until September.) Further complicating things, Walker 8
has retired, and he's been replaced by Judge James Ware.

6. In New York, a blind man, three drag queens, and four activists shut down the intersection of Sixth Avenue at 42nd Street protesting in favor of gay marriage. Their action drew some fifty cops and a news chopper.

Note: Federalism is messy and hard to keep track of, so if we missed anything from the patchwork of decisions this week in various states and cities, please let us know.

[sthrasher@villagevoice.com, twitter: @steven_thrasher]


My Voice Nation Help
1 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Scott Rose
Scott Rose

It's true that the DOJ/Obama decision not to continue defending the constitutionality of DOMA in the courts was made after several judges determined that DOMA is unconstitutional. But, that only shows the need for Republicans, (who are the only human beings on the face of the earth truly to comprehend morality, as God dictated it to a secretary, as is proven by the historical record) to go after the judges who found that DOMA is unconstitutional. How dare judges find that a discriminatory law (that Republicans love, because God loves that law), is UNCONSTITUTIONAL? How dare they? Those judges must have their salaries stopped immediately! Why should tax-payers' money go to pay judges who want to find a law unconstitutional? If it's a law, passed by the Congress of the United States of America, it couldn't even possibly BE unconstitutional! I tell you, if this keeps up, if these activist judge's keep drawing their salaries, they could illegally decide that other things . . . like, like . .. putting a human being in prison for using drugs is unconstitutional! We must stop paying activist judges now, or we will lose our country!

From the Vault

 

©2013 Village Voice, LLC, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places New York

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city