Paul Ryan's Medicare Plan Scaring Voters? Rightblogger Solution: Paul Ryan for President!
Rightbloggers quickly grasped the true lesson of the event: That the man behind the GOP program, Congressman Paul Ryan, should run for President.
Earlier this month the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, smelling blood, pumped $250,000 worth of ad money into Hochul's race against Republican Jane Corwin. Hochul flooded the airwaves with ads like "Look for Yourself," which aligned Corwin with the "Republican budget that would decimate Medicare."
More hilarious was this charming viral video of a dapper Republican throwing an old lady off a cliff, produced by The Agenda Project.
We hardly need tell you what rightblogger reactions to this were like, but it's a holiday weekend so let's enjoy a few:
"The same people who are all for euthanasia and death panels are essentially calling Paul Ryan a murderer for trying to save Medicare," groused Creative Minority Report.
"The Dems conveniently leave out the part that any change in Medicare will not affect people on Medicare now," said The Conservative Lady, "only those who are younger than 55." So, seniors, it's only your children who'll get pushed over the cliff when they get old and sick -- why you stressing?
Some plotted a response ad.
"Maybe some conservative group should produce a sequel in which the granny pushes young children off the cliff?" tweeted The Weekly Standard's Philip Klein. "An ad that's truer to life," rejoined Allahpundit of Hot Air, "would have [kids] tossing money at granny and then diving headfirst off the cliff voluntarily." (Oh, please make that ad.)
Allahpundit wasn't the only one thinking big. At the Daily Caller, Tucker Carlson and Neil Patel put their heads together and came up with several sure-fire responses. Sample: "For nearly 100 years, this country has been the world's greatest power. Thanks to the cowardice and shortsightedness of the current Congress and administration, the American Era is coming to an end. This is a self-inflicted disaster of historic proportions." Add LOLcats and you've got a hit.
In the days before defeat, some rightbloggers saw the electoral writing on the wall and were preemptively embittered.
Ace of Spades, asserting that the Democrats would let Medicare go bankrupt and bring in "death panels," said, "if, faced with these facts, seniors not only acquiesce to this outcome, but in fact affirmatively choose it, then they'll have no one to blame but themselves, and they can cry to someone else when they can't get coverage." Nobody's gonna tell him Republicans don't care about seniors, including seniors.
Jazz Shaw of Hot Air tried to rally GOP voters with this battle cry: "One seat more or less isn't going to make tsunami level headlines. But that doesn't mean it's not worth the effort."
The impact of Medicare policy in the race was evident: Late polls in the district showed voters were as concerned with Medicare as with jobs or the deficit. But right after the results came in (and, for some early despairers, a little before), some rightbloggers tried to minimize it.
|What goes around, comes around.|
Erickson's colleague Nikitas3 spun more intricately: Though he agreed with the conservative consensus that the race's "Tea Party" dark horse Jack Davis was merely "a shill" for the Democrats, Nikitas3 insisted that Davis' 9 percent showing should be counted with Corwin's, and that "51% of voters in NY 26 apparently agreed that Medicare must be reformed," which meant "truly is a new day dawning, and Democrats should be running scared." Haw! Who's the loser now, libtards?
At Smart Politics, Eric Ostermeier's spin was also impressive: "NY-26 has only had a partisan voting index of +6 points for the Republican Party over the last two presidential elections," he said. For some reason Ostermeier did not mention that, when it came to congressional elections, the GOP has held the NY-26 seat for 137 of the past 154 years, and that Republican Chris Lee, whose resignation in a sex scandal necessitated the special election, won in 2010 by 47 points.
"The MSM will message for Democrats all day long," sniffed Professor William A. Jacobson of Legal Insurrection. "Already last night the NY Times rand a banner 'Rubuke Seen To Medicare Plan.'"
Which is funny, because Ryan himself acknowledged that fear of his Medicare plan was a factor in the race ("If you can scare seniors into thinking that their current benefits are being affected, that's going to have an effect"). Even Mitch McConnell seemed to be getting cold feet about Ryan's plan.
Rightbloggers decided it was time to push harder for Ryan's Medicare reform -- against Democrats, but also against "wobbly*" Republicans who, like the Republican voters in NY-26 who bolted, don't endorse every radical idea conservatives present to them. (* This usage refers to both Ryan's own words and to Margaret Thatcher's. Rightbloggers love their secret codes.)
"Beltway Republicans are going wobbly in the wake of the GOP's NY-26 loss," warned Michelle Malkin. "...Tea Party activists need to stand by Ryan and buck him up when the GOP establishment cuts and runs." "This is no time to go wobbly," said Sissy Willis. The Washington Examiner denounced "Republicans who are going wobbly, distancing themselves from Ryan in search of a political advantage." Etc.
Many rhapsodized over Ryan's new video explaining his plan. "I think Paul Ryan's explanation of why Medicare needs fundamental reform is greatly enhanced by his diagrams," said Michael Williams. "Paul Ryan Is Not Giving Up," said The Real Revo. "Another nifty floating charts video," exulted Andrew Stiles of National Review.
So eager were they for affirmation that they even took crumbs from their hated nemesis of years gone by, Slick Willie Clinton.