Little Adolf Hitler's Parents Lose Custody of Their Latest Baby

• I ma not aware of the exact situation but I can only say that kid should never be parted from their parents as it is very difficult for both to live a best life.

• Ironic because "in the best interest of the child" is actually an Adolph Hitler quote!

• Child naming is not free speech. FFS already. Please stop attributing every minute whimper of stupidity and ignorance as being protected Free Speech. Besides, with he right of Free Speech comes the responsibility that it be used wisely. The USSC has long held that shouting fire in a crowded theater does not constitute free speech. Neither does naming your kids such a stupid, hateful name. Moreover, we need to actually start putting some serious action behind the mantra like saying that children are our greatest resource. I find it nauseating that to adopt parents have to jump through all sorts of hoops but any two inbred hillbillies can get together, spit out a litter and spend the next 20 years ruining those lives and creating a burden on the rest of us or worse yet can simply murder their kids and get away with it. Patricia Blackmon was 29 years old when she killed her 2-year-old adopted daughter in Dothan, AL in May 1999. Kenisha Berry at age 20, covered her 4-day-old son with duct tape resulting in his death. Debra Jean Milke was 25 when she killed her 4-year-old son in Arizona in 1989. Dora Luz Durenrostro killed her two daughters, age 4 and 9, and her son, age 8, when she was 34 years old in San Jacinto, California in 1994. Caro Socorro was 42 years old when she killed her three sons, ages 5, 8 and 11, in Santa Rosa Valley, California in 1999. Susan Eubanks murdered her four sons, ages 4, 6, 7 and 14, in San Marcos, California, in 1996 when she was 33. Caroline Young was 49 in Haywood, California when she killed her 4-year-old granddaughter and 6-year-old grandson. Robin Lee Row was 35 years old when she killed her husband, her 10-year-old son and her 8-year-old daughter in Boise, Idaho in 1992. Michelle Sue Tharp was 29 years old in Burgettstown, Pennsylvania when she killed her 7-year-old daughter. Frances Elaine Newton was 21 when she murdered her husband, 7-year-old son and 2-year-old daughter in Houston, Texas. Darlie Lynn Routier was 26 in Rowlett, Texas when she was convicted of killing her 5-year-old son. Teresa Michelle Lewis killed her 51-year-old husband and 26-year-old step son in Keeling, Virgina when she was 33 years old. Andrea Yates murdered her kids because she though they were going to hell. Casey Anthony? The list is endless. Lastly, there seriously need to be an intelligence test for reproduction and in this age of genetic screening we need to start making sure that all offspring are genetically secure. That means resistance to diseases and disorders and the like so don't ever try to bring any whiff of racism there.

• You didn't get the joke; I was accusing those two pieces of trash of being lazy in their white power idiocy. The way things are, you name a child Ted Bundy and people will say "So you're really into 'Married with Children', eh?" But everybody knows ol' crazy Charlie....there is a Nazi link with Manson; James Mason (not the actor), a  long-time participant in American Naziism actially made Charles the honorary leader of his now-defunct "Universal Order" group. Those guys were like the original NSDAP, but on steroids and speed. I say, always know who your enemies are, and everybody I listed was.

• How could you possibly think naming children from God's Holy Word is the same thing as naming your children after evil and corruption? Perhaps you need to find out what's in the bible before you make a comparison like that. hmmmmm.

• There's no good reason for two emotionally and mentally stable loving caring parents to sympathize with the nazi cause so deeply that they feel the need to name their children after the previous century's most notorious mass murderer. It's not because they named their children these names, it's the reasoning behind it. It is as bad as, if not worse than naming your child Charles Manson or Ted Bundy for crying out loud! I'm so glad my parents are not psychologically damaged as is the case of these two people.

• If you're on some sort of white power kick and the government knows about it, naming your kid after Hitler is the wrong way to go about it. Think about it then choose from some of these names: Baldur von Shirach (first leader of the Hitler Youth) Heinz Guderian (German general; created the panzer division, hated Hitler but not enough to stop or kill him) Henry Ford (hated Jews, wrote a Jew-hating book, got medal from German counsulate) Charles Lindbergh (pro-Nazi and isolationist in the 1930s-1940s) Vidkun Quisling (Nowegian Nazi and collaborator, 1940s) Reinhard Heydrich (Head of the Gestapo, ran Bohemia until Free Czech agents blew him up) Heinrich Himmler (Heydrich's boss, founder and leader of the SS) Hasso von Manteufel (German field general; Patton's opponent on the Franco-German border) Kurt Tank (aviation engineer, created the Focke-Wulf 190; Germany's best fighter plane, worked for the Indian aviation industry in 1950s-60s) ....And these are just the people I can come up with off the top of my head. If the skinhead yahoos don't like those names I can give you Boyd Rice (Satanist, ex-uniformed American Nazi, musician) or George Lincoln Rockwell (assassinated leader of the American Nazi Party) or fill-in-the-blank. For every well-known Communist dictator there are five or six lesser-known Fascist/Nazi/Natavist/Klan nutballs. And some of them have links to both major American parties.

• How can anyone name their child Adolf Hitler?! It's disgusting to name anyone after that despicable monster.

• Vic I have a question, why I commend you for working in what I am sure was a very stressful  occupation, why is it that we hear story after story of children that have been murdered at the hands of their abusers after they had been taken out of a home for abuse and then been allowed to be placed back into that home. I will never understand this. I get so mad when I read these stories, WHY would the States EVER EVER put a child back into an abusive situation.

• Why I find these Children's names deplorable, these parents have the right to name their children anything they wish.  What's to stop the family services ( the GOVERNMENT) from zoning in on Christian families that have children with Biblical names such as my own children. I have a Hezekiah, Elijah and Micah. the first two are adults but Micah is 13. Now if they are truly being abused then that is a whole other matter, they should be taken out of the home, but NOT for their names. If we start picking and choosing our free speech then rest assure yours will be next in line.

• Illiterate and a nazi sympathizer? Who would of thought such a thing could exist. 

• Are you seriously suggesting the state has never, ever removed a child from harm's way from an abusive situation?  Ever? Really?  

• I despise what their parents did in naming their kids, but I really do think that after all the attention the parents tried to get for themselves, they have been hounded by people looking for a "happy ending" to all of this. I just feel sorry for the kids who were spawned by these damn attention whores when their plan backfired and everyone reacted. I'd put money on them being pretty good parents to the best of their ability because they KNEW they were being watched if nothing else. So yeah, you made your children sandwich boards instead of people. Yes the whole town then conspired to get your children taken away from you because they didn't like the sign. You're still the bigger tool in this monstrous situation for using children like that. I hope your kids don't hate you, get back with you, remove the name when they can and just never invite the grandparents to social gatherings, ever. I'm just glad my own son, Billy "will give you AIDS and steal your money because he is a complete dick" Smith will have none of the obstacles you put in your own kids' paths to deal with.

• Sick low life professionals that will lie and twist the truth..

• I dont agree with that at all. The state is corrupt and their is no limit to what they will put a family through. The state gets federal grants to keep children in state custody..there are bonuses for CPS case workers etc... I have not seen anything ever provided the state that has ever proved to be in the best interest of the child. What a joke.

• I dont believe that the state should be able to legally kidnap your kids based upon suspicion only. They should have to provide concrete proof that there is abuse. I guess that leaves room for anyone to make a claim about anyone with kids and the state can just step in and over power and ruin a family over hear say and suspicion..get real the state is a joke and takes advantage of having the power that they have been given. How sad that everyone has to judge what they named there kids...so what!! Its there kids. Those kids she be returned back to the parents..

• No, more like a real sign of education.

• Most of this discussion is a real waste of time by people who don't have any idea what they are talking about. I am currently a social worker and know that there are a very long list of things that most of us think are "reasons to remove a child" but the law does not allow removal for those things. The child(ren) have to be in a situation that is neglectful and/or abusive in some way before the law will allow removal. Even then, at times we are forced to work with the family before removal - removal is last resort unless there is immediate danger. This situation cannot be discussed for the very same reason that your business cannot be discussed with just anybody who thinks they need to know. Children's services are not allowed to discuss any cases, it's not everybody's business. I will agree that there are times mistakes are made - it happens to everybody in every business and every walk of life - but the system has to be followed.

• Can anybody understand the stigma this child will have as he grows up?  Some things ought to be retired and the name of one of the world's worst criminals is one of them.   One only has to see that these parents are mentally off naming their children this way.  And if there was abuse, wouldn't anyone remove these children before they are both physically and mentally traumatized??

• She didn't miss-spell a word, she made a typo. You're a moron.

• I'd question the mental state of any individual who would vehemently choose to support  parenst being allowed to retain custody of their children despite proven instances of neglect, abuse and violence in their home... (1 +1 equals 2... not 4) Some things are common sense and not topics up for debate

• First of all it's "they're"....second, I know a lot of people who work for the government because they WANT to, they choose to. That's such a moronic thing to say that the only reason people work for the state is because they can't get a job anywhere else. It's not even based on reality.

• How about using spaces between your words before you worry about spelling

• At least you're honest about being an anti-semite.  I think like jobseeker it stems from being unemployable and stupid.  You should be named Hitler yourself it suits you. 

• No wonder you can't find a job, jobseeker.

• The fact they deny it was because of the name makes you think it was the reason?  Had they not denied it, would that not also have indicated it was because of the name?  What about if they confessed to it being the name?  Seems you would believe it was the name regardless of their response if to you denying something is probative of it being true.  I find people such as yourself, while not necessarily neo-nazis for their defense, usually actually are. 

• So do you really think it is appropriate to name your child something like Hitler? I think folks can name their children whatever they want, but they should  be prepared to face the repercussions. I imagine that poor little Hitler will want to change his name once he is legally able to, but he sure will have a rough time of it in life up until that point.As a mother, I want the best for my child. I would never dream of pushing my own agenda upon him in  the way that these fools have and making his life any more difficult than it already is.   I am not a hypocrite nor self  righteous just because I think these parents are idiots. And I don't care what the "ruling" elite have to say about anything. Plain and simple, these parents are so very wrong to have done this to their children.

• Thereason is fit to judge because Thereason's brains, as proven by Thereason's post, function.

•  There's something sad in anyone who can;t see that a name is indicative of more than just a string of letters thrown together. They've already marked this child for life as the target of bullying, shunning and being unemployable. What more do you need to correct the situation?

• OY Dennis, you should be sterilized. You are all ready brain dead.

• If they are naming their children these names does it not stand to reason that they believe these people were in the right when they did the things they did? People who think dead presidents were heros name their children after people they think did good things, if these people are naming their children after Nazi elite then one could assume that they see Hitler as a hero. It shows their morals and the kind of thinking the children will be subjected to. I understand that people should have basic rights, but when the things you do cause harm or potential harm to children then there are rules for that. Children are defenseless. When you drive a child around without a safety belt/harness you get charged for child endangerment. It doesn't matter if you are in an accident or not the potential for an accident is enough to charge you. To me, this is the same, the names they gave their children could lead to potential harm, and in assuming that they see Hitler as a hero, one would also have to assume they have the same beliefs as Hitler. In American society today acts of violence based on hate carries a harsher punishment that regular assault for the simple fact that our society regulates hate. Do you think these parents would have taught these children that couldn't commit acts of violence based on hate?

• Millions? Cmon now. Exaggeration does not help you're cause. Sounds like you are as much of a bigot as any.

• You are critical of her spelling, yet you cant use the "space-bar" on your keyboard correctly? That is rich. It shows us how, "intelligent", you are.

• You're an idiot, Dennisoy.

• I know every parent has a right to name their child whatever they want. But did they think about the children when they decided to to give them these names. These children are going to persecuted by society.

• I recall when they first started naming their children. Even though I do not agree, they do have the right to name them whatever. I would just hope they would consider how those kids would get treated in school with such names? If they were my parents I am sure I would be looking into a name change later in life....

• If someone wanted to name their child after Mao, Stalin, or any other person including Attila, Bush, Lincoln, Grant, all who in many eyes world over feel that are mass muderers. William Wallace said "those who write history, hang our heroes. Grant is responcible along with Lincoln, and Custer has killed millions of my people. But, no one is going to court over that. The occupied people of Palestine  has endured much genocide and murderer at their keepers hands and we are directly responcible for supporting the Zionist regime. So, hypocrits, wave on and pretend to be rightous and see the pathetic real reason why the ruling elite want to control what you name your children.

• Now look who is judging.... might want to refer to your previous post where you improperly use "their". I guess you were just showing your real sign of intellegence?

• lol Anybody that names their kid Adolf Hitler has got to be facked in the head.

• No it was jews.Which is understandable.

• Mindy , check your spelling.A real sign of intelligence.

• Who are you to judge.

• Are you serious .Their a bunch of people who can't get a job outside of a government agency.

• Irregardless of why these children were taken I applaud the fact they were.  Naming them these names alone shows the flawed character and obvious mental instability of these two individuals.   Another example of the fact children should be deemed a privilege and not a right. 

• If you had named a kid Adolf Hitler, I would hope it would get taken away from you also! That child has to be put in a decent family environment that doesn't teach hate and horrible values. The parents have to be insane and full of hate to do that to their kids.

• Somehow taking away children from parents like these two just does not equal the murder of 50 millions of people both in war & in concentration camps, the making of lamp shades out of human skin, multilating & murdering thousands of  people in "scientific" experiments, throwing living babies into bonfires, the destruction of entire cities, the sinking of unarmed ships, hanging people from meat hooks, etc.  Who can even list the atrocities of Adolph Hitler and of those who followed him? And you think that taking a child who is probably being abused from his/her parents is equal to this?  Learn some history before you start flauting ignorance.

• records should not be open for public review in order to protect the children. It would set a nasty precedent, and more records would be open. No child deserves to have the record and details of the abuse that happened to them follow him/her around all their lives. Its enough to live with the consequences of abuse without every one in your town knowing the details. . As a former child protective services worker, I know that a child'sname would never be enough for taking a child from the home. There has to be evidence of abuse and neglect. There are strict rules and guidelines which often make it extremely dificult to remove a child, even when it would be in the child's best interest. Usually a team and supervisors, as well as a lawyer must agree. Also, all evidence is reviewed in court with both sides having legal counsel. The process is never as fast or as trivial as it is portrayed on television.

• you know this country has gotten too far left ... If I had the balls I would have done exactly the same as these parents, who is to say what we can and what we can't name our children, and as long as they are clean, have a roof over their heads, clean clothes on their backs and educated...what's in a name

• yep...name changed "to protect the innocent"!

• States also have “clicks” that over reach and prove their lack of intelligence that often use the overwork and confidential information excuse to protect their incompetent untrustworthy selves- trust me many are just idiots with a barely their degree if they even hold one- some like to play the race card as in getting even with shall we say themselves at others expense.

• I highly doubt the kids were taken away because of their names only. I think the fact that they were given Nazi inspired names is a pretty big smoking gun and I am sure it is a big factor in the parents being subject to closer scrutiny. I would not be suprised if these two are horrific parents at all. If it looks like dog sh*t, smells like dog sh*t and tastes like dog sh*t, it most likely is dog sh*t...........

• I love how one child can be removed because living circumstances are deemed unfit but they leave two other children in the same house. True case in Texas. Its great how this system is such a great failure. I dont agree with their motives behind their names, but lets be real, thats exactly what through this case into CPSs crosshairs. Someone said they were promoting hate through their children. Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs irrigardless of how unfounded they are. These poor babies didnt have a chance to start life now its going to be forever ruined because this will follow them FOREVER.

• It is always really convenient for social services agencies to not be able to comment on it. While I think it is horrible to name a kid that, I am very concerned about government making decisions based on things like names. The fact that they deny it was because the name and say we would never, makes me think it was definitely the name.

• Carolyn, I work in family law and believe me the Department of Children's Services is the most corrupt, noncooperative department out of all the areas I deal with. They could care less about those children and will lie or do whatever they have to in order for their department to "win" regardless of who gets hurt. I'm not saying they've never helped "any" children, but as a rule they are worthless.

• And I thought the name Apple was bad. It's a shame these parents obviously put their agenda above their children.

• i hope the paewnte prove to be vindicated as fit and they sue whatever agency that did this for so much money that that agency ceases to exist. ......and I hope the children get to benefit from these funds.. Once of legal age then the kids can choose wether or nt to retain their moniker... Phuque the gubbermint.....they are the ones acting like jack-booted thugs...  Serve the fatherland or else sieg hiel to the flag...

• Being a social worker, I can say there would of had to have been evidence to support claims of neglect or abuse.  But, as parents, why would you subject your child to unnecessary ridicule with names of some of the most horrific criminals known to man?  Who would do that and not expect their child to be a target for all kinds of bullying.  I mean, Adolf Hitler for a kids name?  Really? 

• Ajberg51 I agree. With this coming out today i'm betting there will be some answers coming. Childs safety first! I feel theres something going on behind the scenes here that will be revealed.

• These children that were taken away in 2009 need to have a reason why they were taken away. I don't know how CPS was able to take away the children and the new born if they cannot say why. This is the United States. If taken away because of name or belief, then the United States is as bad as Hitler in World War two. We cannot let this happen here in the United States. I believe and many U S citizens need to know now that it has been in the news, as the parents. Yes we all have the right to know, to protect ourselves and others from this type of devastation of legal kidnapping.  

• This is clearly a perfect situation where a name change would be most appropiate for Adolf when he gets older, that name he has is awful

• I agree! There are serious guidelines to follow and they will be upheld in court. At age 5 there truly is something going on, which unfortunately is a big a aprt of our world today.  I speak for the children and their safety. Too many children have been given back to their parents only to find the situation resulting in worse abuse and death..

• The irony is that the Nazis advocated sterilization for morons like them.

• They should of got there two kids back first  if they where innocent, before putting another child on earth with fucked up parents. A book deal must be on the way.

• It would be illegal and against the constitution to take the children because of their legal names. Little Adolf is 5 years old, so I doubt someone woke up and suddenly said hey let's take the kids. Obviously there were real issues in the home.  How about we change the change to the next scheduled program and and quit wasting our time with this.

• There is NO proof that the children's name is why they were taken.  The State is filled with professionals whose job is to protect children and have their decisions hold up in a court of law.  I think it can be assumed that they have other reasons to remove the children.

• If these people are crazy enough to name their children nazi inspired names, then it stand to reason that they are probably NOT stable people, and should not be raising children.

• There is something offensive about the prospect of a child being raised by parents so full of hate, that they would name their child after one of the greatest mass murderers in history.  Lets also just assume that there are dozens of other legal reasons to take the children away, and NJ took all of 5 minutes to investigate...  

• There's something very offensive about the state being able to take a child purely because of a name.  This is a specific political free speech issue which the child protection agency has ben able to twist into some other, more palatable reason.   If anything, the case file and court proceedings must be made available for public inspection and comment, to assure ourselves that we still have a constitutionally protected right to free speech, no matter how offensive our speech may be.

TotalComments: 68