Harvard Crimson OWS Editorial: Leave Poor Goldman Sachs Alone

Harvard_Crimson.jpg
Protesters from Occupy Harvard (it exists) tried to disrupt a Goldman Sachs recruiting event on campus. Not particularly unusual or surprising for an Occupy-related group, right?

Not so fast. The Harvard Crimson is not impressed, as made clear in a staff editorial in today's issue.

It reads in part:

The protest attempted to highlight the alleged pre-eminence of Goldman Sachs in causing the 2008 financial crisis, as well as challenge the undergraduates seeking careers there. And while many experts agree that Goldman was part of the problematic system that created the financial crisis, Occupy Harvard's targeting of a Goldman Sachs recruiting event presents a facile and trivializing interpretation of the root causes of the economic catastrophe and debases our national conversation on the issue.

Obviously, Goldman Sachs is not without blame in the financial crisis. The deceptive and irresponsible peddling of financial products known to be "crap" by their traders stands as a monument to the dangers of an insufficiently regulated financial sector. If Goldman Sachs employees had resisted the kinds of dealing that lead to high bonuses and long-term financial instability, it is possible that the mortgage crisis would not have been as severe as it was. However, to single out Goldman Sachs as a single target of opprobrium for causing the financial crisis is myopic and unoriginal; Goldman has been in the eye of the storm of banker bashing for close to three years now. No one has successfully proven yet that this one investment bank caused the financial crisis and benefited unduly from it. Instead, the bank was simply one actor out of many, and certainly doesn't fit the role of super villain as well as the Occupy Harvard folks imagine it does. For example, an excellent argument could be made that the millions of Americans who took on mortgages beyond their means are equally responsible as a group for the financial meltdown.

Did you get all that? "Opprobrium"? The "alleged" role of Goldman in the financial crisis? Etc.


Many students who enter these fields are not the scions of banking families but rather hard-working students looking for a challenging job that lets them experience a newfound financial prosperity. To exhort students to consider their contribution to society when choosing a career is one thing but to target those who want to work for Goldman Sachs misses the point; whatever negative impact the company has on our economy is due to structural issues rather than questions of individual morality.

Whatever helps you sleep at night, guys!

[via Daily Intel]

[rgray@villagevoice.com] [@_rosiegray]

Go to Runnin' Scared for more Voice news coverage.


Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
The game is rigged.
The game is rigged.

That's like saying "Don't pick on Frank James. He was just part of Jesse's gang."

pedro
pedro

Maybe the editorial was supposed to be printed in the Lampoon and there was a mixup.

Strelnikov
Strelnikov

Harvard is not about challenging anything; it's about perpetating the American elite while giving some very smart kids a shot at joining the power structure. Sam Smith of the Progressive Review went there in the 1950s; all the most interesting people either dropped out, or like Sam, scraped by.

Now Trending

New York Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...