For the Love of God, It's Not 'Downtown' Abbey!

Screen shot 2012-01-19 at 11.30.24 AM.png
Have you seen the extremely popular British period drama called "Downton Abbey"? It's all the rage right now. It won a Golden Globe! People are talking about it, watching it, DVR-ing it, weeping with joy and raising their glasses to it as we speak. And people and news organizations, which are bigger than people, are writing about it, and sometimes they're spelling it wrong. If you have, too, you are in good company. This is not to shame but in the interest of learning -- that wee "w" is tricky! Here are a few of the transgressors. Also, this is totally to shame.

Let's start with Facebook, where there are numerous pages for "Downtown Abbey." One of them has nearly 11,000 people who like it. Little do they know, that show does not exist.

Screen shot 2012-01-19 at 11.53.14 AM.png

Another "Downtown Abbey" page gets it.

Screen shot 2012-01-19 at 11.19.18 AM.png

Wikipedia, our sweet, darling Wikipedia, clearly got it wrong upon the first try -- while the description is fixed, the URL remains something of a blemish.

Screen shot 2012-01-19 at 11.17.27 AM.png

While this piece from ContactMusic.com questions the historical accuracy of the show, it fails to question the accuracy of its own headline.

Screen shot 2012-01-19 at 10.41.48 AM.png

These two stories, from the Hollywood Reporter and the Telegraph, have been corrected, but Google has retained the mortifying memory of what was.

Screen shot 2012-01-19 at 11.28.24 AM.png

In this transgression, Reuters, The Wrap, and Yahoo are all implicated: "'Downtown Abbey' officially takes its place among the best of 'Masterpiece' titles since the series began in 1971," executive producer Rebecca Eaton said of the series. "It's beautifully done and draws in millions of viewers - what more could we ask for?" [For it to be spelled properly?]
Screen shot 2012-01-19 at 11.00.37 AM.png

The Observer figured it out...
Screen shot 2012-01-19 at 11.25.13 AM.png

The New York Post, the Chicago Tribune, USA Today, the Contra Costa Times, the Times Union, EW, and even the New York Times have all messed up, the latter on a "Downtown Abbey" photo caption after the Globes!

(When in doubt, check the URLS.)

All of this has us wondering, why shouldn't there be a Downtown Abbey, the funkier, hipper version of the other, the countering Julie Brown of a lower hemisphere, the FOIL? It worked for MTV. Meme-makers, get on that. If we're gonna be wrong, we might as well be right. Right?

Screen shot 2012-01-19 at 11.38.13 AM.png
Would so watch that.

[JDoll / @thisisjendoll]

Go to Runnin' Scared for all our latest news coverage.

My Voice Nation Help
2 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Fuck you, Jen Doll
Fuck you, Jen Doll

Since you gleefully shame others, I have no qualms in publicly calling you fucking ignorant and oblivious. It's common Wikipedia practice to include pages with titles that are misspelled or contain other errors so that users can find the article they are looking for instead of coming up empty-handed. These pages redirect to the proper article. If you didn't know this before, you should have noticed the notation just under the title of the Wikipedia article found at the URL you posted; it reads "(Redirected from Downtown abbey)."

m1kesa1m0ns
m1kesa1m0ns

While ignorance is as plausible an excuse as any, it also looks like an autocorrect disaster slowly unfolding.

Now Trending

New York Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...