CISPA: House OKs Internet Security Bill, President Obama Promises To Veto Measure

256px-Personal_Computer_774.JPG.jpeg
In the latest round of Congress v. internet, the House of Representatives voted 248-168 Thursday in favor of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act.

The measure would encourage companies such as Facebook to freely share your info with law enforcement agencies if you seem like a "cyber threat" -- thing is, what exactly makes one a "cyber threat" seems a little unclear.

President Barack Obama's administration has promised to veto the bill. He says it doesn't do enough to protect "the nation's critical systems from cyber attacks and would erode consumer-privacy safeguards."

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) who leads the House Intelligence Committee, introduced the proposal because he wants government and businesses "to voluntarily share data on cyber threats and gives businesses legal immunity for such exchanges," according to Businessweek.

He and other legislators worry that cyberspies will attack American intellectual property and as well as the U.S.'s web infrastructure.

Opponents, however, say that the act is SOPA and PIPA-like in its threats to privacy. Groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation fear that it would make internet companies unaccountable in their handling of user data in relation to law enforcement. And, as detailed by ProPublica, the White House thinks that "CISPA would enable military and intelligence agencies to take on a policing role on the internet, which the administration points out is a civilian sphere."

Also sketchy: whether CISPA would actually do anything to beef up cyber security.

Check back to the Voice for updates.

Follow Victoria Bekiempis @vicbekiempis.

My Voice Nation Help
4 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Peter Rafferty
Peter Rafferty

This is what happens when people who know nothing about the internet try to make rulings about the internet...

JeffreyJSmith.NewYork@usa.com
JeffreyJSmith.NewYork@usa.com

Large parts of the Tea Parties were carefull control operations. Classic contain and control operations..like the Buckley part of the right wing in the 1960's and 70's

But in the GENUINE patriotic movement there have been large shockwaves over the many, many attempts to control the web and increasingly limit free speech.

Just look at the articles i the American Free Press. Alex Jones has a, well sort of a Birchsociety quality to me, but his show on the web and shortwave and the drudge report have folowed and rang loud alarms at EVERY STAGE of thepresent attempts to limit the weband, again, your free speech.

Hey, that center out in UTAH ain't there for nothing.......

nellpost
nellpost

Why aren't the teapartiers protesting this government intrusion???

Leibniz
Leibniz

Because they're authoritarians who support fascism so long as they think it'll work in their favor, even though they'll be as badly harmed as everyone else?

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...