City Council Approves NYU 2031 Expansion

Categories: NYU Expansion

nyu-mercer-st_4818 front_image.jpg

In face of jeers from Greenwich Village residents, the City Council approved New York University's 2031 expansion plan by a 44-1 vote this afternoon.

The nearly 20-year construction project, which will not begin until 2014, will expand the university's campus to include additional academic facilities, housing for incoming freshman and faculty, create additional retail locations and has dedicated space for a public school.

The most contentious part of the expansion plan focused on the area known as the "superblock", which will be comprised of four new buildings bounded by West 3rd, Mercer, W Houston, and LaGuardia Place. Residents fear that it will not fit in with the rest of the neighborhood, take away community space, and attract too many restaurants and bars.

Moments before the Council voted on the expansion, Greenwich Village residents became angry and started to chant "Chin and Quinn did us in!".

The entire balcony, filled with residents, was escorted out of the Council chambers before the vote could take place.

Following the disruption, Quinn said. "This expansion plan will be an even greater force to bring people to New York to study."

"When this is all said in done in 2031, people will look back and say Margaret Chin did a great job of balancing the demands of Village residents while acknowledging NYU's need to expand."

Council member Charles Barron was the only dissenting voice in Council chambers.

"You don't put people out because they are frustrated about what you're doing to their neighborhood where you don't have to live," said Barron, who urged Council members to vote against the expansion.

Several Council members, including Land Use chair Leroy Conrie, cited the Village's liveliness in support of the modified expansion plan.

"The Village is an active area, perhaps more so than anywhere else in the city," Conrie said. "This is not the kind of place where people are going to bed at 8 p.m."

The battle over the university's expansion has spanned over five years, with Greenwich Village residents and NYU facing off in the media and at public hearings. Both Village residents and City Council members have openly talked about their skepticism towards the large university, with many citing the problems relating to the expansion of another private university, Columbia, as foreshadowing conflicts in the area.

After last month's hearing, where City Council members told NYU their existing plan was out of scale and did not appropriately blend with the existing neighborhood, the university made modifications and last week offered up a new plan for the council to vote on.

The new expansion plan, which contains a 27 percent reduction in building height and density, contains three main revisions:

1) Reduction in building density-- NYU scaled down the density of several of its proposed buildings by 25 percent. The proposed "Zipper Building,"which is to replace the current Coles Sports Center, has been reduced by 70,000 square feet.

2) Increase in open space -- this was a major source of contention for council members at the previous hearing. Under the new plan, NYU will create several more open spaces for public use and fund upkeep for existing spaces such as the Sasaki garden and parkland. The university also pledged to create a $150,000 endowment for grounds maintenance in addition to their upkeep costs.

3) Community consultation on NYU's open space -- NYU has pledged to create two committees that will serve to oversee the university's efforts towards making open space available to the general public and will also create a liason between the university and the community on construction progress. Each committee will be comprised of five members, chosen by the city council and with one NYU representative.

Margaret Chin, who represents the area, supported the new plan and encouraged her fellow Council members and Greenwich Village residents to get on board.

"Today I've heard NYU commit to major modification," Chin said at last week's hearing. "To be honest, no one got everything they wanted but I hope this new plan will allow
NYU to grow at a modest pace and keep the residents happy."

Despite these changes and Chin's support, Greenwich Village residents claimed NYU's modifications were hardly compromises and drafted a plan of their own for the university's expansion. In the days leading up to the final vote, expansion opponents organized the group StandUp4NYC along with a video calling out Speaker Christine Quinn and Mayor Bloomberg, dubbed by them as "Mike the Mogul."

StandUp4NYC also started an online petition asking Speaker Quinn to demand NYU make the expansion's financing details public. At press time the petition had collected 154 signatures.

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

Building two massive towers on a garden and a children's playground does not create more open green space.  NYU has a history of intentionally misleading and distorting the truth. 


Pres. John Sexton was never elected to his position. We, the NYU faculty, never had a say in his ascension to the throne. He was appointed. Margaret Chin, Speaker Quinn and the rest of the sad and sorry assemblage that makes up the present sham of a City Council, however, were elected to their positions. To a person, they were voted in to their positions of public duty, entrusted with the responsibility to protect their constituents and to advocate for their well-being, their security and their prosperity. In reading the quotes from Chin and Mendez, in light of these public officials sworn oaths and Lincoln's quote adorning the City Council's ceiling ("Government of the people, by the people, for the people..."), I can only think of one word polite enough to use here: Disgrace. The community had more than done its part in this entire process. Between the CB2 report, the findings of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, and the NYU faculty's own road map toward a more sustainable, fiscally-responsible and student debt-conscious model for future grown, the City Council had received a set of principled solutions to both the community's as well as NYU's academic (as opposed to commercial and gym) needs. For months, we waited for the City Planning Commission and the City Council to recognize the administration's land grab for what it really was -- and to act on behalf of the community and its needs, placing them ahead of the wants of a university administration turned real estate tycoon. We waited and hoped in vain. But we did not work in vain. Those whom we voted into office in error – and whom we trusted to safeguard our interests and our rights – did not do their job. The fix was in from the start. The City Council has done its worst. We will continue to do our best to save both NYU's academic integrity and the Village itself, body and soul. And while our elected officials refused to give neither the Village community nor NYU's own community of faculty and students a fair hearing, it is my hope that the courts will.


NYU saved the entire Village from turning into Newark in the 1970's.  NYU kept W Sq. from turning into a drug market.  Everyone in ther Village should be thankful that NYU didn't abandon the area and move uptown. It is private and can charge any tuition it wants.  One of my law degrees is from NYU and I am always, always grateful for that.  I grew up in the Bronx. I know the difference.  NYU was the only thing the Village had going in 1975 because NYU wouldn't leave.  The University deseerves praise and careful, positive consideration of their future plans.  Every brick they put up adds to the whole area and the City.  They never ran away, they stood by the city.


There is no mention or concern from the City Council on how this $6 billion plan is going to be paid.   Students will be paying for this plan with higher tuition and student debt.   Is increasing tuition really sustainable when NYU students are already paying $40K in tuition alone per year?    Student debt default rates are dramatically increasing, and yet, this plan is justified because of all the jobs created on the backs of students.


Please visit to see how you can get involved.   Somebody has to put a stop to this plan.  Think how much better the U.S. would be if somebody had stopped the single-family crisis.


Now Trending

New York Concert Tickets

From the Vault