A Cooper Union Student, the Chair of Trustees, and Felix Salmon Walked Into a Debate

coop_thumb_1.jpg
CS Muncy
ICYMI: After Cooper Union president Jamshed Bharucha met students for a surprise discussion in his office earlier this week, on Wednesday morning Democracy Now! hosted a rare, moderated forum with Victoria Sobel, a Cooper Union student organizer, Mark Epstein, the chair of trustees, and Felix Salmon, a Reuters blogger.

Much of the discussion dealt with Cooper's decision to charge tuition after what appears to be a series of bad financial decisions--by 2008, the school had invested $103 million in hedge funds, which demanded $2 million in annual management fees, and in 2006, the school took out a $175 million loan from MetLife, on which it has to pay roughly $10 million in annual interest. Meanwhile, the administration is scrambling to find a way to make it to 2018, when rent on the Chrysler building, the land under which Cooper owns, will jump.

Trustee chairman Mark Epstein placed much of the blame on the alumni's shoulders, saying that the school didn't receive enough giving. "We don't have alumni support," he said at one point. "I question their commitment to the school, other than verbal."

After Salmon, who has written extensively about the Cooper Union crisis, grilled Epstein for specifics, Sobel jumped in to reflect student occupiers' view of the situation.

"[Tuition] is something that's going to impact students on a class and racial level," she said. Sobel also highlighted the lack of transparency surrounding the school's decisions, which has led to students' occupying the president's office--now, more than a week--and demanding reform.

"Our biggest complaint is that there is no forum in the existing governance which allows the student body and the faculty or the deans to criticize or remove members of the board of trustees," Sobel said.

Classes at the school have ended, but students have said they have intention of leaving until their demands--one of which calls for the ousting of the president--are met.

Send story ideas to sbrownstone@villagevoice.com. Follow her on Twitter here.


Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
gmtgmt
gmtgmt like.author.displayName 1 Like

I think that it is very unfair to blame the alumni, when quite frankly, 1/2 the alumni are artist/architects; low paying professions that are the first to tank when the economy has a downturn. We give what we can. However, we don't necessarily have the kind of money graduates of harvard and princeton (who only have a small percentage of graduates in the "Arts") earn.

jackpot
jackpot

@gmtgmt You've stated the problem.  Some alumni donate $0 because they can't donate $1,000,000  Give $10 if that is all you can afford to spare!

Jack_Foreigner
Jack_Foreigner

@gmtgmt IRRC, the guy was complaining about rates of participation and not necessarily the absolute total amount contributed...if so (gotta check the transcripts for that), his indictment of the alumni would seem to stand -- though, as one of the debaters on-air had rebutted, alumni are reluctant to contribute when their money (allegedly) can't be targeted towards tuition, say, but are simply dumped in a general fund....

Now Trending

New York Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...