Catholic League President: Brutal Treatment of Women at Ireland's Infamous Magdalene Laundries Is "All A Lie"

Bill_Donohue.jpg
Bill Donohue, whose face always looks like that.
So, what's perpetually aggrieved Catholic League president Bill Donohue mad about this week? Is it gay people? Is it the "bizarre" notion of gay people getting married? Is it all those gay priests sneaking into the Catholic Church (who are the real problem over there, in Donohue's mind anyway, rather than all that child abuse)?

The man has a bit of a theme, is what we're saying. But Donohue switched gears yesterday, taking time away from his busy schedule of gay-hating and light art criticism to declare, bizarrely, that Ireland's infamous Magdalene Laundries were "a myth" and "a lie."

In case you're not up on your Irish history, the Magadalene Laundries were workhouses where women and girls were incarcerated, starting from the late 18th century and continuing till the middle of the 20th. Inhabitants of the laundries were referred to as "penitents." Contrary to popular belief, one that was helped along by a Hollywood movie about the laundries, they weren't solely meant for unmarried pregnant women or prostitutes; some of their inhabitants were also neglected children, some as young as nine or 10, referred by social service agencies. Women with minor criminal convictions were also sent to the laundries. And some of their inhabitants were simply desperately poor and voluntarily committed themselves. (You can see a few surviving photos of a typical laundry and its inhabitants here.)

Most women, though, had approximately zero say in going to these institutions; once they arrived, their lives were characterized by brutally hard work, rigid restrictions, spartan living conditions, humiliation, hunger, cold, and in some cases, an early grave. The survivors advocacy group Justice for Magdalenes writes, "These women were denied freedom of movement, they were never paid for their labour, and they were denied their given names and identities."

These types of institutions were found throughout England and parts of the United States too, but Ireland really led the pack; between 1922, when the Irish state was founded, and 1966 1996, when the last laundry closed, an estimated 10,000 women passed through their doors.

Although some of these women were sent away by their families, a recent report from the Irish Parliament that about a quarter of the laundry residents were sent there by the state. Last month, the Irish government agreed to pay up to 58 million euros in restitution to laundry survivors..

In case you're wondering where Donohue's stake lies in all of this: the laundries were run by Catholic nuns. Four different orders operated laundries, including The Mercy Sisters, the Sisters of Our Lady of Charity, the Sisters of Charity, and the Good Shepherd Sisters. (All of those orders, by the way, recently declined to help pay restitution to the survivors.)

It's a dark chapter in history for Ireland, for women, and for the Catholic Church. But in a "special report" released yesterday, titled "Myths of the Magdalene Laundries," Donohue argues, basically, that the laundries really weren't all that bad, and even if they were, it wasn't the nuns' fault.

"[T]here was no holocaust, and there was no gulag," he writes. "No one was murdered. No one was imprisoned, nor forced against her will to stay. There was no slave labor. Not a single woman was sexually abused by a nun. Not one. It's all a lie."

It's true that the nuns don't appear to have wantonly sexually abused or murdered the women incarcerated in the laundries. But the claim that there was no physical abuse whatsoever is, to put it mildly, controversial. As evidence, Donohue points to one place: a report by Martin McAleese, the chairman of a committee set up by the Irish government to investigate the laundries. The McAleese report found that most women weren't physically or sexually abused in the laundries; some women even recounted positive experiences there.

But the McAleese report has been criticized by the United Nations Committee Against Torture (UNCAT), which was concerned that the investigation wasn't particularly thorough or independent. As they wrote in a letter to the UN's Irish representative: "[T]he committee has received information from several sources highlighting that the McAleese Report, despite its length and detail, did not conduct a fully independent investigation into allegations of arbitrary detention, forced labour or ill-treatment."

But the report is enough for Donohue, who also writes: "Even by today's standards in the West, these conditions are hardly draconian; in the past they were considered pedestrian. And consider the timeline: fully 82 percent of the incidents reported took place before 1970." Beatings were just in vogue back then, he adds: "Keep in mind that corporal punishment was not uncommon in many homes (and in many parts of the world), never mind in facilities that housed troubled persons."

"Troubled persons" like nine-year-old girls and poor women, that is.

Donohue will allow that the working conditions in the laundries were "harsh," and that they included "standing for long hours, constantly washing laundry in cold water, and using heavy irons for many hours." But doing all that for years on end, unpaid, unable to leave, doesn't strike him as slave labor.

"Drudgery? Yes," he writes. "But if this is 'torture,' then it is safe to say that millions have suffered this fate without ever knowing they did."

In the end, Donohue sees any criticism of the laundries as evidence of vicious, widespread anti-Catholic prejudice. He writes: "The horror stories associated with the Magdalene Laundries cannot withstand scrutiny, but they will continue to have a life of their own. That's the way prejudice works. Unwarranted negative attitudes, especially when employed about a familiar whipping boy, are hard to shake."

It takes a special sort of mind to look at reports of forced labor and see "unwarranted negative attitudes." But clearly Donohue's got what it takes.

My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
jbohemier61
jbohemier61

'Dark Chapters' in the Catholic Church started with the Crusades and "just a keep on a coming!!!"  ...  maybe we should have kept the laundries and got rid of the Catholic Church instead!!! 

jbohemier61
jbohemier61

Not only did this happen, but most likely it was far worse than most of what was ever reported to offficials. And for the one who made the comment in here on how these forced labor Laundries are any worse than any other woman living during that time that was poor, those other women who worked and were poor at least got paid something.  These women got paid zilch.  On top of that, many were severely abused by the church.  I could not imagine having to live with nuns my whole life.  They are some of the most abusive women in the world.  All who don't measure up in their eyes are sinners.  Personally, I would have preferred that those who lead the Catholic Church be forced to work for those laundries and receive the same pay and treatment as these women were forced to did.  I figure, with all the crap the Catholic Church has dumped on all Christians, the vast majority of the Church's leaders would have to work for the next three hundred years to repent for the sins that have come to light through out the United States in the name of Jesus and God Almighty.  Then there's Europe to cover for which lasted even longer, plus the Holy Wars known as the Crusades that were conducted by the Catholic Church during the dark ages where the Church sent armies though out the Middle East killing those who didn't believe in the Catholic message (and I point out that this was a Catholic message that those who didn't believe were killed over, not the Christian message, as non-Catholic Christians were killed during the Crusades too).  While the new Pope is a huge breath of fresh air, he's the only fresh air this church has seen in the last 2000 years.  There's a shit load of damage done by this church that needs to be apologized for...now if only all those who need to be apologized to were still alive to hear it come from the Pope... 

mari_tee
mari_tee

Hard to imagine bloviating Bill Donohue, who has never set foot in a Magdalene Laundry and has no historical/academic background or education in them, pontificating (and selling some pamphlet for $5), all based on a report that has already been found by the UN Committee Against Torture to be lacking, not independent and a complete whitewash of the religious orders. But bang on, Bill, bang on. 

@waynestewart78 What you may not know about the Magdalene Laundries is unlike private industry, poor as conditions may have been, the women were paid nothing, subjected to abuse, were not free to leave and suffered punishments such as being forced to kneel for hours in prayer, marched in wet bedsheets and made to lie prone on the floor for hours as "penance" for minor infractions. They were beaten for little to no reason, sexually abused and ridiculed by nuns, lay workers (delivery men, groundskeepers, priests, etc.) and others, and had their names taken from them. They were also not permitted to talk to their fellow inmates. If they tried to escape, they were dragged back by Irish gardai (police). If they died in the Laundries, they were buried in unmarked graves on the properties. So they mattered as little in death as they did in life. 

Donohue is a fool and is now part of an "elite" group of three such apologists and deniers including William Oddie and Brian O'Neill. All bought the McAleese report as chapter and verse on the laundries, despite the publicly available evidence that was not included in the report (http://www.magdalenelaundries.com/State_Involvement_in_the_Magdalene_Laundries_public.pdf), despite that two large laundries' records (Galway and Dun Laoghaire) were not included, and despite the testimony of even non-Magdalene employees and visitors to these institutions. It is also important to remember that McAleese's only remit was to determine if there was State complicity in the Laundries, which he did in fact find. He stepped way over the line on his remit and in doing so, corrupted his own report with inaccuracies, bad math and missing data.

waynestewart78
waynestewart78

Considering the times, how were working conditions for poor women any better in private industry?

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...