Daily Voice «

» Runnin' Scared «

a Voice news blog

update notifications

email

subscribe
unsubscribe

categories

Bush Subprime Bailout Will Help Few New Yorkers

Posted by Michael Clancy at 6:00 AM, December 11, 2007


In 2006, 9,088 homes in New York City were in foreclosure. In the first six months of 2007, 6,743 homes entered foreclosure proceedings.
Illustration courtesy of the Center for Responsible Lending

By Eileen Markey

Thanks for nothing. That's what sub-prime mortgage victims in New York's at-risk neighborhoods are saying about the Bush administration plan to freeze interest rates for homeowners whose sub-prime loans are set to balloon next year.

The plan, which asks for voluntary participation from banks that made the mortgages, will freeze interest rates on sub-prime loans for up to five years, meaning the homeowners would get to keep paying off their mortgage at the current interest rate, not the higher ones looming. But only homeowners who are less than a month behind on repayments, receive their mortgages in 2005, 2006 or 2007 and whose interest rates will not reset until 2008 are eligible.

"It sounds like its going to be a very small group of people who are helped," said Eric Fergen, outreach coordinator for University Neighborhood Housing Program, a Bronx organization that advocates for affordable housing and has been researching risky sub-prime mortgages for several years.

A UNHP study found more than half of the foreclosure filings in the Bronx in 2006 and 2007 happened when the mortgages where less than two years old, suggesting even without the exploding adjusted interest rates many homeowners couldn't afford their homes to begin with, Fergen said. "Those people are not going to benefit at all," he said.

But UNHP and other groups advocating a more substantial solution to the sub-prime mortgage meltdown say people who signed bad loans deserve help because the loosely regulated investment banking industry pressured their sub-prime lending partners to make risky home loans then packaged and sold the mortgages for investors: the riskier the loan the bigger the gambling pay off. For an in-depth look at how the investment banks profited off all of this, read "Wall Street and the Making of the Subprime Disaster."

The meltdown isn't simply the result of irresponsible buyers taking out a bigger loans than they could repay, Fergen said. "The lenders and brokers were aggressively pushing these products, even when some people could have qualified for a regular prime rate mortgage," Fergen said. "Brokers get a larger commission based on a higher interest loan."

Margaret Groarke, a board member of the NorthWest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition, which is pressuring for an across the board freeze on all sub-prime mortgages and the establishment of an assistance fund for borrowers said homeowners aren't asking for a bailout or for the government or anyone else to pay off their debt.

"We're not asking anyone to give out money. We are asking for a reasonable loan rate," she said. The assistance fund the Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition and other members of the Save the American Dream coalition advocate would cover the costs of refinancing loans, basically closing costs, not the loans themselves.

The Center for Responsible Lending, a nonprofit that studies predatory lending nationally, estimates only 145,000, or 7 percent of the 7.2 million families with sub-prime mortgages will get any relief under the Bush plan. But 14 percent are already in foreclosure, and a December 2006 study by the Center for Responsible Lending projected 2.2 million families who signed sub-prime mortgages between 1998 and 2006 have and will lose their homes in the next few years.

In the five boroughs, 6,743 homes entered foreclosure proceedings in the first half of 2007, according to mortgage default filings. The full year figure is set to outpace last year's 9,088 NYC foreclosures. According census data and foreclosure actions analyzed by Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project, and NYC non-profit, foreclosures are most common in neighborhoods where more than half of the residents are black and Latino. Check out this map for a wave of woe.

Those patterns echo Center for Responsible Lending analysis of federal banking data which found that 52 percent of home loans made to African Americans in 2006 were sub-prime, compared to 40 percent of home loans made to Latinos and 22 percent made to non Hispanic whites.

All those people who are already in foreclosure will be left out of the Bush plan. So will the homeowners whose adjustable rate mortgages or ARMs have already adjusted or will before January.

comments

subject: Foreclosure Fraud, Wall Street, FREDDIE MAC, Judicial Corruption, etc.

Any representation to Wall Street Investors by FREDDIE MAC that FREDDIE’S reported $2 billion losses are due to people defaulting on their mortgages must be weighed against the fact that (in states such as Louisiana), Freddie Mac is paying DEBT COLLECTION firms needless, outrageous litigation costs for corporate lawyers to outmaneuver –and even persecute people when they oppose unlawful foreclosures. In Louisiana, long before Hurricane Katrina, the entrenched real estate and mortgage fraud racketeering scheme has been in operation. But thanks to federal authorities such as U.S. Attorney Jim Letten and U.S. Attorney David Dugas, real estate racketeers in Louisiana have nothing to worry about. Verification of what I have written is posted on my www.lawgrace.org website.

http://www.lawgrace.org/2007/12/08/my-december-7-2007-comment-posted-to-the-times-picayune-blog-about-the-news-article-entitled-%e2%80%9cjudge-gets-debt-reprieve-badeaux-has-skipped-mortgage-payments%e2%80%9d-the-foreclosure-of-this-lo/
===================================================================
*Also, posted on NEWSBLAZE.COM, see this article: "Mortgage Mess, Foreclosure Fraud and Impediments to Justice:"

Most critical to the Foreclosure Crisis is FORECLOSURE FRAUD, which enables MORTGAGE LENDERS to ILLEGALLY FLIP properties. In Louisiana, 2 particular mortgage companies which benefit from fraudulent foreclosures are Wells Fargo and FREDDIE MAC! It is HIGHLY COMMON for a DEBT COLLECTOR attorney to file a foreclosure: (i) in the name of a DEFUNCT mortgage company;(ii) in the name of a mortgage company which is NO LONGER holder of the security interest (the promissory note); or (iii) file a foreclosure and AFFIX a "ransom" amount (the collector's fee) far exceeding what the promissory note "Acceleration Clause" authorizes.

Despite a property owner's entitlement to Challenge CONTRARY-TO-LAW loss of his / her home, most property owners LACK consumer and legal knowledge; the Court System is REFRACTORY; and there are limited attorneys with acumen to pursue Consumer Law. Also, when borrowers sue for "Unfair Debt Collection Practices," damages, the collector gets to make more $$ through prolonged litigation, as co-conspirators enjoy the foreclosure pie.

Investors need to become more astute about how mortgage servicers' misdeeds hurts borrowers as well as siphons incalculable amounts of money from what Investors should reap. (See "Limiting Abuse and Opportunism By Mortgage Servicers," AND "Private Property Rights Deferred: Has Predatory Mortgage Servicing Destroyed The American Dream" by Rawle Andrews, Jr., Esq.,and Leroy Jones, Jr., J.D. Visit: http://www.msfraud.org/index.html.)

http://newsblaze.com/story/20071203130614tsop.nb/newsblaze/TOPSTORY/Top-Stories.
====================================================================

Barbara Ann Jackson
Law & Grace, Inc.
www.lawgrace.org
LOUISIANA

Posted by: Barbara Ann Jackson at December 12, 2007 2:02 AM

Please view our Save the American Dream video, "Jingle Down Wall Street" video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6PwPTUr9Cw

Posted by: NTIC at December 13, 2007 12:43 PM

I am a former senior loan officer for a regional mortgage bank. It made me sick to see how we took advantage of consumers for thousands of extra dollars. Sometimes these were smart people who simply didn’t know any better. So I developed this simple Mortgage Loan Comparison Worksheet. If borrowers just used this easy tool when shopping for a mortgage, predatory lending in this country could virtually be eradicated:

http://www.januspresentations.com/MortgageLoanComparisonWorksheet.pdf

Problem is, most borrowers only make a decision once every seven years, so how would they even know what to look for? As a loan officer my mission was not to educate, but to get a signature on the bottom line, at any cost.

Based upon my experience, here are the Top 10 Mistakes Mortgage Borrowers Make:

1. Not knowing which mortgage fees the borrower can -- and cannot -- negotiate.

2. Choosing and trusting the first loan officer the borrower interviews.

3. Using an interest-only or "payment option" adjustable-rate loan primarily to qualify for a more expensive house than you could normally afford.

4. Thinking the interest rate is always the main thing.

5. Not comparing the final fees listed on the closing documents to the up-front estimates to avoid the lender "packing the loan" with added-on fees without the borrower's knowledge.

6. Not knowing if the mortgage has a pre-payment penalty - until it's too late.

7. Thinking that renting is always just throwing money away.

8. The borrower does not know if he or she is paying a back-end yield spread or Service Release Premium.

9. Paying for mortgage life insurance, credit insurance or other expensive lender add-ons to increase the amount of kickbacks the lender can receive from various vendors.

10. Paying hundreds of dollars to have a company set up a biweekly mortgage payment plan, something the borrower can generally do for herself or himself -- for free.

From "Kickback: Confessions of a Mortgage Salesman," one of the best-selling books on mortgages on Amazon.com.


Posted by: Ted Janusz at December 16, 2007 9:45 AM

Ah, another liberal finding just about anything to blame Bush for. Can't say I'm surprised.

Listen, the sub-prime loans that these "unfortunate" people are involved in are signed contracts. Do you understand what a contract is? Maybe you don't because for some reason you're finding fault in the government for not breaching written agreements between two parties.

Make up your mind. Do you want more government control or less government control? You can't have both.

The sub-prime blame rests solely on the consumer, and that's a fact. These "unfortunates" should have read the fine print.

Posted by: Tom at December 25, 2007 9:09 PM

post a comment



Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)
 
Three best things to do in New York on
Friday, July 25