Daily Voice «

» Runnin' Scared «

a Voice news blog

update notifications

email

subscribe
unsubscribe

categories

War On Terror, Inc.

Posted by Chris Thompson at 7:12 AM, December 21, 2007

If you haven’t heard of L-3 Communications, you’re not alone. The company, which is located just a few blocks from the United Nations headquarters, didn’t even exist ten years ago. Today, it’s the sixth-largest defense contractor in the nation, with billions of dollars in federal contracts to provide electronic border surveillance and intelligence and interpreter gigs for the occupation of Iraq. The War on Terror has been very, very good to the company.

But sometimes a good deal just goes south. In 2005, L-3 Communications borrowed almost $3 billion to buy Titan, a San Diego-based company that provided all the interpreters and translators for the military in Iraq. The “linguist” business should have made L-3 a nice chunk of change, as the next contract, which was to be renewed in late 2006, was estimated to be worth $4.6 billion.

But as the Abu Ghraib scandal expanded, L-3’s leaders found they had bought something else with the company: liability. Lawyers for the Center for Constitutional Rights filed a lawsuit against Titan for its role in the Abu Ghraib interrogations, and L-3 had to spend a wad on lawyers and deal with a public relations crisis. Then, in December 2006, the Pentagon decided to give the linguist contract to L-3’s rival, the Washington DC-based Dyncorp. Billions of dollars in potential revenue vanished overnight.

Or so you’d think. But what does a good defense contractor do when things don’t go their way? Stall for time.

L-3’s officials immediately protested the decisions with the Government Accountability Office, and Pentagon officials were forced to spend almost a year reviewing the case. Meanwhile, since L-3’s interpreters were already on the ground, they got to keep the contract—and its revenue—on an interim basis. A few weeks ago, the Pentagon’s representatives concluded that their initial decision was perfectly sound and awarded the contract once again to Dyncorp.

Last week, according to the Wall Street Journal, ( ) L-3’s leaders filed yet another protest, which will inevitably drag the case out for months once more, as the company keeps raking in the interim contract’s profits.

Now, that’s you fight the War on Terror!

comments

What will happen to L3 employees already in Iraq? will they loose their jobs?

Posted by: at December 21, 2007 1:32 PM

In the world of services contracting, those doing the work often simply switch badges to that of the new winning company and accept their pay/benefits.

The competitive difference is in how each company would plan to staff and how much they charge. The lowest bidder often wins, but then they have to be able to hire enough people to do the job and make enough profit to make it all worth the while for the company.

So a competitor who bids too low will find itself in a hard spot if it can't convince the existing company employees to work for them for what they're willing to pay. On other hand - where else do a large numberof Iraqi translators find employment? Hence, the badge switching typically will apply.

Posted by: contractor at December 22, 2007 11:11 AM

post a comment



Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)
 
Three best things to do in New York on
Sunday, October 12