village voice
RSS/Podcast feed for Village Voice News Status Ain't Hood
The All-Dirty Edition
Vlada Lounge
Enter to win a $50 gift certificate to Vlada Lounge!
Alice Smith
Enter to win tickets to see Alice Smith on Thursday, May 22nd at the Highline Ballroom!
SoHo Stroll 2008
Enter to win a SoHo Stroll 2008 broom signed by James Blunt and designed and decorated by the New York Academy of Art!
Elia Salon
Enter to Win A Hair Package Special by the BEST DOMINICAN SALON for you & a friend!
Lit Lounge
Enter for complimentary admission to see Power Solo from Denmark with Band Antenna, Sea That Dried Up, and Chem Trail at Lit Lounge!
United Artists
Enter to win a 90th Anniversary United Artists DVD prize package!
Iron & Silk
Enter to win 5 personal training sessions at Iron & Silk Fitness!

» Runnin' Scared «

edited by Michael Clancy | email: mclancy@villagevoice.com

'Anonymous' vs. Scientology: 'Our Nonsense is Free'

Posted by John DeSio at 1:47 PM, March 17, 2008

“Our nonsense is free.”

If any single sign best described the spirit of the protesters parked in front of the Church of Scientology’s Time Square headquarters on Saturday it was that sentiment, referencing not only the Church’s notorious “pay-as-you-go” brand of religious instruction but the upbeat, sometimes goofy demeanor of the loose-knit band of activists that make up the scourge of Scientology, “Anonymous.”

“Operation Party Hard” celebrated the birthday of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard with protests at Church outposts across the world. In New York close to 300 people did their best to hide their faces from Scientology’s cameras to air their grievances with the Church, though Anons assured the handful of reporters in attendance that “over 9,000” of their compatriots were attending similar events in other cities.

Given the Church of Scientology’s history of harassing its critics, a policy outlined in Hubbard’s “fair game” memo of the mid-1960’s, no member of the assembled throng would offer their names to the media, stating instead that they were just “Anonymous.” Anonymous #1 wore a black suit and tie and covered his face with a paper surgical mask. He said he was there to oppose Scientology’s treatment of its own parishioners. Critics have accused the Church of cutting members off from their families, controlling every aspect of their lives and even, as in the case of Lisa McPherson, having a hand in a member's death.

“What brings me personally here is how disgusted I am with their practices against their own patrons,” said Anonymous #1. “They charge thousands and thousands of dollars and they have been known to commit egregious crimes against members of their own church...Simply look up Lisa McPherson. Her name will reveal enough.”

Anonymous #2 wore a top hat and sunglasses, and said his personal mission was to alert onlookers of the “unfair” tax exempt status enjoyed by the Church of Scientology. At least 80 percent of all fees for “religious training and services” paid to the Church of Scientology are tax deductible, a privilege enjoyed by no other religion and a fact that does not sit well with Church critics. “They actually have a better tax exempt status than any other religion of all the established religions,” said Anonymous #2. While we spoke, he noted the presence of a very obvious camera in a third floor window of the Church across the street. That’s why he needs his sunglasses, he said. “They’re taking pictures of us right now, as we speak.”

Though masks at such protests are verboten by New York State law most protesters wore some kind of disguise, be it a pair of sunglasses or a scarf or even a wig. When a passerby would make the spontaneous decision to join the protest more than one “Anonymous” member would quickly offer them a paper mask. “You don’t want them to see your face, to take your picture,” said one protester to a young couple that decided to join the protest as he handed them their surgical disguise. The masks worked well enough to shield one’s face from Scientology’s prying eyes, but they were not without their own pitfalls. One protester asked anyone he could find if they had a pen to poke a hole in the surgical mask, as his friend was having a hard time breathing through it. Covering one’s mouth also makes it harder to speak clearly, as evident in the number of times “what did you say?” was uttered between “Anons.”

But those masks and other facial coverings are vital, said Anonymous #3, who wore a blue trench coat and a glasses-nose-mustache disguise, ala Groucho Marx. Though “Anonymous” has no leaders he had the task of acting as a liaison between protesters, police and the New York Civil Liberties Union, who had a representative on hand to observe the event. The first protests, held on February 10 to honor McPherson’s birthday, were basically thrown together on a whim, he said. This time around things were much more organized because they had to be. All week rumors were swirling on “Anonymous” message boards that the Church might throw several plants into the protests to make “Anonymous” look bad while also painting the Church as a victim. At least one suspected plant was thrown out of the New York protest, and a protocol for dealing with possible staged violence within the protest was even put forward: “if shit goes down, sit down.”

“They use their money, their connections, and basically their bullshit to have people who are speaking out against them silenced,” said Anonymous #3. Scientology, he said, engages in forms of “extreme harassment” to quiet its critics. “If they put someone in here with us who chants stupid shit, or racist shit, they can use it to make us all look bad. We can’t have that, so we have to be vigilant.”

While Scientology plants needed to be sniffed out other unlikely participants were greeted to the protest with open arms. Numerous vehicles passing by, including more than a few taxis and several postal service vehicles, responded in the affirmative to signs urging them to honk if they thought Scientology was a cult, and each time loud cheering sounded from the crowd. One father brought his two young children to the protest, both of whom carried signs denouncing the Church. “Did you see those kids? The little girl can’t be older than six,” said one “Anon” to another in glee. “That’s fucking awesome!”

As the midtown protest wound down various “Anons” made their plans to head uptown together, to Scientology’s Celebrity Center on East 82nd Street. “We have a sound permit for up there,” said one Anon to another. “It’s gonna be fantastic.” Anonymous #3 said that members of the Church have contacted various “Anons” covertly to discuss leaving the Church. In the past Scientology only faced a handful of critics, but today they face the full wrath of the Internet. As the numbers grow more Scientologists will be willing to escape, he said. “That’s the sort of stuff that keeps us coming back,” he said.

“Anons” had special balloons printed to celebrate Hubbard’s birthday, and many brought donuts and snack cakes to share with one another. Some waved chuckle-worthy signs like “Honk if you are driving.” They sang “Happy Birthday” to L. Ron, and mixed chants of “Battlefield Earth sucks!” in with their more serious statements against the Church. They danced, laughed, and even tried to “Rickroll.” And while handing out literature to tourists and theatergoers walking past the pen police had built to hold “Anonymous,” one compared information to food.

“Taste the delicious bacon sandwich of truth about Scientology!” he shouted.

Read about Anonymous vs. Scientology on the left coast in LA Weekly.

more: Scientology

comments

I applaud anonymous for giving a sense of levity to such a heavy situation.
The "Church" of $cientology is a nasty piece of work!

Posted by: Marc Abian at March 17, 2008 3:23 PM

"Our nonsense is free"- love it! Great to see someone finally able to stand up to the cult and its army of lawyers!

www.whyaretheydead.net
www.youfoundthecard.com
www.xenu.net

Posted by: Lu at March 17, 2008 3:40 PM

Nice article, well written and to the point.

I commend you sir, good show!

Posted by: Anon at March 17, 2008 3:41 PM

THE PROTESTERS ARE GREAT. VIVA PROTEST.

SCIENTOLOGY IS A DEADLY CULT HIDING BEHIND RICHES AND MARKETING.

Scientology terrorizes critics.

Posted by: BEN at March 17, 2008 3:47 PM

Good article. Much thanks.

Posted by: John at March 17, 2008 4:03 PM

Really great to see some decent coverage of the protests. Thanks.

p.s.: i herd you liek mudkips? :)

Posted by: seebs at March 17, 2008 4:04 PM

Awesome! Glad to see some coverage about this worldwide event! This cult definitely needs more attention.

Posted by: Terryeo at March 17, 2008 4:10 PM

Thank you for tghis lovely article about a dangerous con that takes peoples money and reduces their freewill.
If your readers would like to hear what judges have to say about this cult go to-
http://www.xenu.net/archive/disk/archive/quotes.htm

Posted by: terryeieio at March 17, 2008 4:14 PM

This is a fantastic article! Thanks so much for covering the protest, Mr. DeSio. The next one is going to be on April 12th - we hope that the Village Voice will be there once again! :)

Posted by: Anonybird at March 17, 2008 4:28 PM

Go Anonomous! Fight $cientology!
Tom "Short Short Man" Cruise and is cohort David Miscavige are crazy!

Posted by: anonNYC at March 17, 2008 4:41 PM

Scientologists are supposed to be the first ones to correct a wrong situation, but in this case, they're letting Anonymous do their work for them. Keeping Scientology Working charges every Scientologist with the duty to keep the church pure, yet their leader, David Miscavige has been changing the books to the point Hubbard is hardly a part of it. There isn't even a photo of LRH on the front page of their website. Hubbard is disappearing from his own religion.

Posted by: rinderblewsocanyou at March 17, 2008 5:01 PM

The people crowing about what a "great article" this is apparently don't know the first thing about journalism. Building an entire article around unveriable quotes from anonymous people is bullshit journalism of the highest order.

Posted by: Augustushaynes at March 17, 2008 5:23 PM

Brilliant article! It's refreshing to read an article where the reporter has clearly done their homework. The Scientologists will keep regurgitating the same "hate crime" nonsense and will do their best to squash valid criticisms of their organization.

Don't let them do that, Anonymous! You people rock!

Posted by: Angela Gupta at March 17, 2008 6:08 PM

Wonderful article! One of the best I've read on Anon vs. Co$

Posted by: 4tehlulz at March 17, 2008 6:16 PM

It's good to see that there is reporting of this in the US. London, UK had at least 500 protesters and yet our media has completely ignored it - one might think that they are afraid of being sued.

Posted by: Lucy at March 17, 2008 6:55 PM

More nonsense indeed from Anonymous. Add threats, bomb scares, misinformation and half-truths and you have a propaganda campaign that Joseph Goebbles would love.

Posted by: Steve at March 17, 2008 7:05 PM

Augustus, the quotes themselves backed up the article. Xenu.net and the others are there for the reading. I also enjoy reading the myths of scientology site. Nice spin on the freezoners. That one article completely negates anything else on that site. Total bullshit.

Posted by: MrChillyAnon at March 17, 2008 7:11 PM

Hello Steve!

Did Doyle send you?

What is your OT level? (Or are you a preclear?)

What is the RPF?

Do you agree with David Miscavige's plan for the "global obliteration of psychiatry"?

What is Fair Game?

What is Operation Snow White?

What is Operation Freakout?

What is a SP?

If a psychiatrist that worked with children was drowning in a lake, would you save him/her?

Please answer all of the above, in your opinion, without refering to a link and I will take you seriously.

Posted by: James Jingelheimer at March 17, 2008 7:18 PM

Indeed, Steve.
A bomb threat in lovely high-definition straight from... Youtube? Wait, what?

Posted by: somebody at March 17, 2008 7:23 PM

Hello to "Augustushaynes" and "Steve", our local scientologists :)

Posted by: huggychan at March 17, 2008 7:24 PM

Steve, if you're going to make Nazi references, get the name right. It's Joseph *Goebbels*. By the way, Anonymous does not have camps that are used to concentrate people who disagree with them, we do not use the legal system to harass critics, we do not force children to work for us and keep them from seeing their parents. These are all things that have been standard CO$ practices for years. See you in April for Operation Reconnect!

Posted by: evee at March 17, 2008 8:02 PM

I've been a scientologist for a long time, and all these recent attempts at quashing free speech of peaceful legal protestors through the abuse of the legal system by incompetent lawyers in clearwater florida really makes me think twice about the motives behind the organization that claims publicly to be a benevolent religion, but privately it harasses critics, makes false-flag attacks against itself and tries to shift the blame onto other innocent people, and keeps a scientologist from being exposed to any non-scientologist point of view.

It gives me hope that Mike Rinder, a very high level scientologist has left the organization. Maybe I can too but frankly I'm too afraid of David Miscavige, the current leader of this corrupt business.

Posted by: terryeo at March 17, 2008 8:11 PM

Superb article! Go NYC Anonymous! Please, everyone reading this, join the next protest against this vicious, vindictive, dangerous cult scam on April 12th. This will concentrate on scientology's wicked practice of breaking up families, and is called 'Operation Reconnect'. Be there, for great justice...

Posted by: at March 17, 2008 8:21 PM

Goebbels Miscavige Heads of Propaganda

Posted by: Bean at March 17, 2008 8:38 PM

Excellent article! Best I've seen so far. If the "church" pulls any of it's Fair Game BS on Village Voice for this you guys need to let Anon know - we've got your back. Study the style of Augustushaynes and Steve carefully as they reveal the church's particular flavor of comments trolling. They always sound the same and they are always and forever fail.

Posted by: lol wut at March 17, 2008 8:47 PM

re: bombthreat from "anonymous" on YouTube -- Funny how Scientology's video hit piece on Anonymous features a MUCH HIGHER RESOLUTION version of that video than appeared on YouTube -- hmmm... Ya think maybe Scientology produced the faux bomb-threat video?

Posted by: Janey at March 17, 2008 8:47 PM

Steve, what are your crimes?

We are anonymous,
We are legion,
We are Peaceful
Expect Us

The rank and file scilons have nothing to fear, we mean no harm, we just want the knowledge of what is done in their name by Scilon Leaders to be known.
School House Rock rule #1
Knowledge is Power


Posted by: Anonymous at March 17, 2008 9:26 PM

James,

I respect freedom of speech as much as anyone. I am offended by your statements but I am mostly concerned that you bring up the subject of pychiatry.

When I was introduced to Scientology I went to the internet and investigated Scientology, then I asked hard questions to get the other side of the story from Scientology. I got these questions answered. Now, I am a preclear.

I was not sent by Doyle, the OSA or anyone else.

As far as what I know of Operation Snow White and Operation Freakout these were simply criminal acts committed by overzealous people who felt justified because their religion was being attacked and as much as those attacks consisted of libel, I am proud that my church did the right thing and cooperated with authorities to put those people in jail and then made substantial changes in church policy to prevent such from happening again.

An SP is a Suppressive Person in that he/she does harm to someone to suppress. Fair game consists of any legal action such as lawsuits to identify and stop an SP from continuing to do harm. People calling themselves Anonymous, wearing masks and protesting Scientology do not neccesarily qualify as an SP. The SPs would be those who are actually committing crimes, not just something they did once, are actually doing harm and do so in an anonymous manner.

If a psychiatrist that worked with children was drowning in a lake, I as most any Scientologist, would save him/her in spite of all the people who have died from psychiatrist's prescriptions of psychotropic drugs, ECT(Electro-Convulsive Therapy), and lobotomies; however Scientologists are working hard to obliterate psychiatry so that psychiatrists don't continue to kill more people. This is being done using education and other legal means to expose the crimes of psychiatry. Google "psychiatry psychotropics lobotomies" to find out more and to find that Scientologists are hardly a lone voice opposing psychiatry.

Posted by: Curiouser at March 17, 2008 9:26 PM

Steve, Augustus. The article isn't a wikipedia article, they can't put footnotes to every quote. You can go to xenu.net for the sources.

If you're inside, we want you to know: we're doing this for you. We want you to be safe from Miscavige's abuses and squirreling. Practice your beliefs safely in the freezone, where it's cheaper and away from OSA. Don't be afraid to find answers outside of your superiors.

Posted by: Ella at March 17, 2008 9:38 PM

Steve- "Add threats, bomb scares, misinformation and half-truths and you have a propaganda campaign that Joseph Goebbles would love."

That must be why CoS uses those tactics daily. Come on. They freaked out and called the bomb squad when they found a suitcase in an alley. They say all these things, but they can't back them up. They never ever say who answered the threatening phone calls. Just "a woman" and "she was so terrified that..."
If these things are really happening call the cops and have them investigate the matter. Let them figure out who is guilty of the crime. It isn't up to CoS to be judge, jury and executioner about it. They've already filed a suit against a teenage girl just trying to walk to work.

Posted by: Tired of BS at March 17, 2008 9:45 PM

At last, someone is fighting the good fight against the cult.

Posted by: Kdog at March 17, 2008 9:47 PM

"The people crowing about what a "great article" this is apparently don't know the first thing about journalism. Building an entire article around unveriable quotes from anonymous people is bullshit journalism of the highest order."

A paper can legitimately report "Person A says X-Y-Z" without having to know the first and last name of Person A and without having to know whether "X-Y-Z" is actually true. Believe me, the Church of Scientology would suffer FAR more than any of its critics if papers suddenly instituted a policy of never printing others' unproven statements: not a single word of Church doctrine could be printed, and neither could their fabulously wacky conspiracy theories about every single psychiatrist on earth being a criminal and part of an enormous conspiracy run by Soviet Russia and members of the Bank of England.

On the other hand, the fact that Lisa McPherson died after Scientologists took her away from real medical care, illegally dosed her with Valium and chloral hydrate, and then drove 45 minutes to reach a hospital with a Scientologist in the ER instead of any of the four hospitals that were closer, including one just two minutes away -- that's verifiable, and would be printed.

Posted by: AF at March 17, 2008 9:52 PM

Curiouser - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfu7Sr50N7U Do you agree with the violent terms and imagery that David uses in this video? A grenade that says "psych buster"? Blowing up "psych fuel lines"?

Posted by: J at March 17, 2008 11:15 PM

Great article, thanks for the coverage. Regardless of the anti-religious slant of the internet youth, the pertinent questions here are:

1) Should a "pay-as-you-go religion" be tax exempt?
2) Is Scientology's harassment of critics against the law?
3) Is Scientology a Dangerous New Religious Movement?

As far as I can tell

1) See Operation Snow White. Continued harassment of the FBI eventually resulted in Scientology getting tax exempt status. Also see the "Hernandez" decision.
2) See Operation Freakout.. This behavior continues today (see the BBC Freakout in action on youtube)
3) A Dangerous New Religious Movement can be objectively classified as something like this:
http://www.witchvox.com/va/dt_va.html?a=usny&c=basics&id=2877

Virulent hostility towards critics, open centralized censorship of members, undo emphasis on recruiting, the amount of money they require, their front groups, their officially designated dropout process, doctrinal authority given to the leaders, and the almost total control the church has over it's members. I highly recommend the new web resource http://exscientologykids.org for those trying to do research.

These protests are not against the Church of Scientology directly, their beliefs are about as odd as many mainstream religions. If Co$ changed very specific policies the protest would be over.

Posted by: Calvin Lawson at March 17, 2008 11:43 PM

What a wonderful article about such a historic event! I wish I was back in NY just to have been a part of it.

Perhaps some of you can now understand better what it was like for Theresa Duncan and Jeremy Blake to be victims of this cult, with how the scientology harasses it opponients. It's too bad they didn't hang in there a bit longer because if they had, I am certain they would have be a part of that crowd, too They are just 2 of the many who are a victims of scientology's conspiracy to silence it's critics.

Posted by: Mary McConnell at March 17, 2008 11:49 PM

The people crowing about what a "great article" this is apparently don't know the first thing about journalism.

I take it BLOG in the URL didn't register, did it? Scientology edu-ma-cation fails again!

If a psychiatrist that worked with children was drowning in a lake, I as most any Scientologist, would save him/her in spite of all the people who have died from psychiatrist's prescriptions of psychotropic drugs, ECT(Electro-Convulsive Therapy), and lobotomies; however Scientologists are working hard to obliterate psychiatry so that psychiatrists don't continue to kill more people. This is being done using education and other legal means to expose the crimes of psychiatry. Google "psychiatry psychotropics lobotomies" to find out more and to find that Scientologists are hardly a lone voice opposing psychiatry.

Except lobotomies are almost never done, and ECT is an extreme method-- and one that few psychiatrists ever perform(and only under anesthesia), something that we're trying to figure out the WHY of how it works. Psychiatry does not kill, although ANY INDIVIDUAL, NO MATTER THE JOB OR SYSTEM OF BELIEF, IS CAPABLE OF KILLING. ONLY A GIGANTIC IDIOT WOULD BELIEVE ANY RELIGION OR NON-RELIGION TO BE FREE OF PEOPLE CAPABLE OF COMMITTING MURDER. Psychiatrists strive to assist and save people-- and they can leave at any time! They're not harassed, sued, stalked, or even murdered!

Hey Curiouser, how come I need to pay for all of Scientology's services, any yet in any other religion, I don't need to give a dime, if I wish? Why are there so many tales of forced abortions and human rights violations from within the CoS? It is foolish to believe that all these people without outside contact leave, and all end up with such similar occurrences of violence!

Niacin, LRH's vitamin/drug of choice, is even worse than any antidepressant(which can be balanced out, or sometimes even avoided with proper therapy, such as what Jung, Adler, Maslow, and others did).

From the Alternative Medicine Encyclopedia:

Certain conditions preclude the use of high doses of niacin. These disorders include gout, diabetes, peptic ulcer, liver or kidney disease, and high blood pressure requiring medication. Even in the absence of these conditions, a patient on high doses of niacin should be closely monitored to be sure the therapy is both effective and without complications. A frequent side effect of this therapy is extreme flushing of the face and neck. It is harmless, but can be unpleasant. An alternative form of nicotinic acid that does not cause flushing is inositol hexaniacinate. "Slow release" niacin also causes less flushing, but should not be taken as there is higher risk of liver inflammation.

Posted by: Dio Brando at March 18, 2008 2:45 AM

It's fantastic to see that a cult pretending to make people more able has not yet been able itself to observe that his Public Relation ways and methods and its attacks against those criticizing it have deserved the worse ever reputation of any cult in the world.
Every move from scientology against the critics attract more and more people, but scientologists don't see it, blinded by their cultic brainwashing. Too bad.

Ex-scientologists have received a fantastic help from Anonymous, and in the past, from people who were scandalized by how the cult was trying to silence its opponents. But the cult keeps on lying, twisting facts, attacking everyone around, and pretending nevertheless to be the almost absolute truth as well as the only salvation way for humanity.

Posted by: roger gonnet at March 18, 2008 2:56 AM

I don't see much silencing of critics here. I've been in Scientology for a while now, and I've heard it all. Governments, psychiatry, drug companies, and now kids in halloween costumes trying to stop us from helping people. Why do you think we've survived all of these attacks? And gotten much bigger? Many other organizations have withered and died under much less than we've been through. It's because the people who have experienced Mr. Hubbards technology have solved the puzzles of life and feel much better. It's just too much fun to give up doing. So, when a few rant and lie, we just continue on. Making more money, having less headaches, having lasting relationships, etc. You wouldn't give it up either if it happened to you.

Posted by: Stephen Paul Reid at March 18, 2008 3:37 AM

I just viewed this youtube video which is supposed to prove that MsCavidge wants to do something violent against psychiatry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfu7Sr50N7U because you asked if I "agree with the violent terms and imagery that David uses in this video? A grenade that says "psych buster?" Blowing up "psych fuel lines?". As the video was quite detailed and explicit about using the press to educate people regarding psychiatry and setting up a hotline for people to call in complaints regarding psychiatric abuse, I assume you are objecting to the figurative terms and imagery and not the actual acttons discussed. I would have to say that I could possibly have some consideration that people could possibly interpret these figurative terms and imagery as a suggestion to literally take violent action against psychiatry, and perhaps a case could be made about the terms and imagery being inappropriate for a church. On the other hand we could take a look at what psychiatrists are actually doing with just psychotropics alone never mind what they are still doing with ECT and even lobotomies by googling "psychiatry psychotropics death". On doing so I find it sad that the FDA was brought in on claims that Scientologists were curing people with emeters while doing nothing about psychiatrists killing people with ECT, lobotomies and now psychotropics. If you go back over the Lisa McPherson story you might notice that the Doctors were basically saying that Lisa's behavioral problems were in her head and were sending her to the psyche ward when actually the problem was a brain embolism. It is unfortunate that Lisa's friends bought into this diagnosis instead of taking her to a better doctor right away. I am proud that the church accepted responsibility for this and settled financially with Lisa's family and I agree that the financial settelment did not bring Lisa back nor did the subsequent implementation of policies to prevent this from happening again. Now if psychiatry could learn from their mistakes as well. Google "psychiatry lobotomy psychotropic deaths" and tell me this isn't violent. Also don't overlook the connection between the campus and other shooters and psychotropics.

Posted by: Curiouser at March 18, 2008 3:55 AM

Curiously, ECT and Lobotomies are LONG fucking dead and gone. What you just did is akin to me linking to the crusades to prove Christianity is evil. Psychiatry has learned and cleaned it's act up, Christianity arguably has cleaned it's act up. why the fuck can't scientology do the same. That's all we are asking after all

Posted by: BKOttawaAnon at March 18, 2008 4:12 AM

I am glad that Anonymous is finally creating enough uncontrollable media interest that people may finally realize what a truly dangerous organization the "Church of Scientology" is. I am also glad Anonymous has moved beyond such questionable tactics as "denial of service " assaults on Scientology websites to legal ways to oppose the cultists. Now it is up to the rest of us, long time silent opponents of Scientology, to take it one step further. Call your congressman or senator and demand that Scientology's tax-exempt status be removed since it is not a religious organization but a for profit enterprise. That will hurt them where it counts.

Posted by: Adam McIntosh at March 18, 2008 4:21 AM

Steve, you said as far as you know, "As far as what I know of Operation Snow White and Operation Freakout these were simply criminal acts committed by overzealous people who felt justified because their religion was being attacked and as much as those attacks consisted of libel, I am proud that my church did the right thing and cooperated with authorities to put those people in jail and then made substantial changes in church policy to prevent such from happening again."

Now, would your church have the same attitude toward a rogue protester? No, it's already demonstrated that it will paint every critic with the same brush.

Furthermore, what your church did after Operation Snow White was exposed was egregious. "Criminal acts by overzealous people?" Darlin, it was Hubbard's own orders that set this in motion; orders that made him a co-conspirator and sent his cowardly ass into hiding for the rest of his life while Mary Sue, his wife, did prison time. Furthermore, your church did NOT comply with the law. The Guardians Office, or GO, was not disbanded! It was merely renamed Office of Special Affairs (OSA) and many of the people from the GO who were involved in this domestic espionage are still there, still in, and still OSA.

Steve, your church lied to you, and you are merely repeating those lies. Wake up and smell the coffee! Scientology's lies are very easy to refute. No, the critical sites aren't full of lies. There's a little thing called 'documentation' that can come in real handy, and Google is your friend. Suggest you google Operation Snow White and look at extracts of the FBI files for that case. Or do a FOIA and get the actual documents.

Augustus, "veriable?" Are you one of those second generation members displaying the benefits of Scientology's superior educational programs?

Posted by: barbonymous at March 18, 2008 7:00 AM

JAMES DUDE.

SERIOUSLY.

Scientology likes to trot that line out about op snow white. 'Those few bad apples were taken care of, we reformed.'

However i have also seen the scientology videos suggesting that the US government had it in for scientology.I have also seen the reports that at the time scientology said they were charged for nothing more than stealing office photocopy paper.

A dozen of the TOP level people in scientology were sentenced. TOP LEVEL. Hubbards wife JAMES. HIS WIFE. For wire tappingand stealing government documents.

And they took the fall for up to 5000 scientologists carrying out elements of operation snow white world wide. You need go no further than wikipedia to find that out. And god knows, if that was a lie about the fbi reports, scientology would have sued wikipedia off the face of the earth.

And scientology has been caught again and again down the years since snow white, in various countries like greece and spain for the exact same stuff. What did scientologists in greece need with plans to a military airfield?

Why is belgium currently taking scientology to court for a list of crimes.

Why is it treated so harshly in germany?

Why was a woman held against her will in italy recently for weeks in a vermin filled room, a woman lucky to have been rescued at all.

Does that sound like reform to you JAMES?

or just a lot of bad apples?

Posted by: anonymous at March 18, 2008 9:27 AM

I can't believe that any Scientologist would actually even try to defend this so-called churches treatment of Lisa McPherson. It is obvious that those who are are either a) OSA PR plants or b) to lazy or afraid to do their own research.

The autopsy photos of this poor young woman are easy to google. She had lost appx 40 lbs in the 17 days that she was held naked in a filthy vermin infested room. Her body was bruised. She had bite marks. The notes from her own Scientology minders (which were made public in court proceedings) tell of a woman who was completely freaking out...yet, they did not take her to a hospital or a doctor.

And oh yes, before you say that Co$ was "exonerated" -- it is also important to note that the Co$ sued and harassed the city of Clearwater for years--including the coroner.

Do some real research and then see if you have the stomach to defend the way Co$ behaved.

Also: go to exscientologykids.com and read the heartbreaking stories of young people who have recently fled the Cult.

Posted by: anon1957 at March 18, 2008 9:57 AM

This discussion is not about psychiatry, don´t try to change the subject. It is about the abuses of this dangerous cult.
Google another one:
Project Normandy
This cult actually took the city of Clearwater and now acts as if they owned it. There are suspitions that they tried to influence an election, wich is forbiden to tax excempt churches.

Posted by: Anónimo at March 18, 2008 10:08 AM

Stephen Paul Reid aka Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf:

"Why do you think we've survived all of these attacks? And gotten much bigger?"

Did you know that your church counts anyone who have ever taken an e-meter test as a member, even those who have left for decades? That's right. According to your church, Mark Bunker is also a member of Scientology.

Your numbers have been shrinking for a long time now. It's falling right before your eyes, and you're too blind to see it.

Posted by: Anonymous863 at March 18, 2008 10:57 AM

@ Stephen Paul Reid

I don't see much silencing of critics here

Because you can't find most of us. But just to humor you:
http://blackfish.biz/allen/?p=246
Sounds like harassment to me. And, gee whiz, he wasn't even a critic. Wasn't. Didn't Magoo say "OSA is creating enemies for the CoS"? Well, score one more for the Marcabian Fleet.

@ Curioser

Fair game consists of any legal action such as lawsuits to identify and stop an SP from continuing to do harm.

Legal actions? Harassment is not legal. What does Hubbard say about lawsuits? That the goal is not to win them but to harass, right?

People calling themselves Anonymous, wearing masks and protesting Scientology do not neccesarily qualify as an SP.

Then why are there reports coming in of Anonymous members being tailed, harassed, stalked, etc? I'll tell you: Because what we are doing is harming the churches reputation even though the information we dispense is true. What difference does it make if you crack a few good eggs in the process of serving the world that delicious thetan free omelette? Right?

The SPs would be those who are actually committing crimes, not just something they did once, are actually doing harm and do so in an anonymous manner

So the church definition of a crime is:

Something done repeatedly that harms the church (regardless of whether it's true or not) under anonymity.

You pretty much summed up Anonymous. But we don't need to make up our "blood, sex crimes" on the church...they keep all their footbullets locked in a sekrit kabnit at every org.

See you for Operation Reconnect.

Posted by: Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! at March 18, 2008 12:01 PM

@ Anónimo

There are suspitions that they tried to influence an election, wich is forbiden to tax excempt churches.

Not suspicions but actual leaked emails. In other words, proof.

Posted by: Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! at March 18, 2008 12:06 PM

More lies from 863. I don't have an AKA. My family is Scottish going back 4 centuries. The Church only counts persons who have done a course or have received auditing. We don't count ex members and the last time I was in Clearwater, extra course rooms were being built to accomodate an extra 2000 people who wanted to take some new courses. Sorry, I don't have the time to debunk all the rest of the nonsense here.

Posted by: Stephen Paul Reid at March 18, 2008 12:13 PM

anyone that believes the bomb threats, "white powder" mailings, and what may well be all the harassing phone calls and threats to the "church" weren't a collective scientology ploy, could only be a lower level scientologist.

Posted by: anonymous at March 18, 2008 12:25 PM

HAHAHAHA!

O, the sweet, sweet sound of the drums of war, complimented oh-so-nicely by the barking of the hounds.

Posted by: Trey Burba at March 18, 2008 12:46 PM

The world loves Anonymous. The ARSCC also loves Anonymous.

Posted by: Fredric L. Rice at March 18, 2008 1:10 PM

Great article. Kudos to Anonymous.

Posted by: Mojo at March 18, 2008 1:22 PM

Damn protesterrorists! How dare they peacefully terrorize a legitimate busi-er.. religion.

Posted by: at March 18, 2008 2:01 PM

Great article, one of the few reporters to actually do their homework. I read one story recently where the reporter said "the Church of Anonymous" is protesting the Church of Scientology." It's the sort of thing that makes you wonder about the media ..if they cannot get THAT right, can anything they say be trusted?

Scientology is thought to only have about 50k members worldwide.

If you read their black PR about psychiatry one would think you've been time warped into the early 1900s. They speak constantly about lobotomies being done daily, and ECT as torture, and I've actually read claims by Scientology that Psychiatrists enslave people and force them to use drugs. It's the sort of thing that any educated person just shakes their head at...But Scientologists firmly believe this. I think it gets brainwashed into them during auditing somehow.

Any modality has room for improvement, and no science is perfect, which is why psychiatry is constantly evolving. In the days of Bedlam doctors were at a loss desperately seeking ways to alleviate suffering, and surely in these days some of those treatments would appear barbaric to us. But just from studying photos of that time, one gets a sense of relief that at least THOSE days are gone, even if treatments are not "perfect".

Scientology clears the mind, (reactive) through auditing. That very process removes the conscious mind from connection with right/wrong thought and action. The member feels "better" because their memories and attachment to their "sins" in this and past lives are entirely erased. This makes for persons without consciouses. Any other religion that believes in prior lives uses the negative experiences in prior lives as remembrances on how to act in this life, they do NOT erase/clear those memories as they are valuable sign posts on how to behave in THIS life. Also, a person going to a confessional with a Catholic priest, for instance, will be heard, and be told to "go and sin no more" and be asked to do a penance as a sign of sincerity, but in no way does that process seek to erase/clear the mind of the sin/trauma.

We learn via our mistakes to do better the next time, we learn via pain in how to heal and move on, Scientology produces people with what is known as the SCILON STARE. Those people are blank in the mind and separated from the heart center because they have had their minds wiped clear of any guideposts to right acts. That is why they are so easy for the church to control, that is why they feel no guilt in how they treat others, that is why they appear to be automatons blindly repeating things that a right thinking person can clearly see are lies.

All one need do is rewatch the Tom Cruise video to see the total disconnect visible in his eyes audible in his words, and clear in his actions, he BELIEVES he is invincible, he BELIEVES he is right, and he has absolutely no connection between body, mind, and spirit, something that is VITAL to human life. People watch it and they know something is wrong with him but they cannot put their fingers on exactly what that is....he is all up in his head attempting to project this power that normal people see as sheer insanity...he believes he can make SPs disappear, but I do wonder what is going to happen to his mind if he is ever finally able to realize he's been bamboozled.

The suicide rate among ex scientologists is very high. There IS a reason for this.

Thanks again for the great article. The human toll this EFFECTIVE mind control technique has taken is tremendous, and only by shinning a light into the darkness within which this cult operates, can people ever truly be free.

Posted by: James Lightfield at March 18, 2008 2:50 PM

Alright, time to break down an OSA plant.

I don't see much silencing of critics here.

Paulette Cooper. Shawn Lonsdale. One was framed(thankfully, it was thwarted), the other "killed himself", after suddenly acting suspiciously in his last few weeks of life-- a man who otherwise kept his calm when Scientology posted his social security number on posters also alerting businesses to his admitted past offense for prostitution.

I've been in Scientology for a while now, and I've heard it all.

AHAHAHAHA, no. You aren't anywhere near OT VII, I'm betting.

Governments, psychiatry, drug companies, and now kids in halloween costumes trying to stop us from helping people.

You just sank your own battleship. Key thing here is that GOVERNMENTS recognize you as a threat. The KKK is a nuisance, at best. The WBC and even Warren Jeff's polygamist cult are seen as merely troublesome and annoying. Al Qaeda is seen as a threat. Notice a pattern here? David Miscavige sure seems to be so kind, what with stories of physically and verbally abusing members, as well as the whole concept of disconnecting.


Why do you think we've survived all of these attacks? And gotten much bigger?

Money, all money. Infiltrating the IRS, and harassing critics. However, the ultimate defense requires that the protected one stop moving. The tide is turning. Change is in the air. Soon, time will freeze and the steamroller of your demise shall appear and crush-- not you, not Scientology-- but the ass behind it, David Miscavige. Those who dare to step on others, steal from them, stalk them, beat them, rape them, and when done, KILL THEM.

Many other organizations have withered and died under much less than we've been through.

At the risk of Godwin's Law, so did the Nazi party. With similar messages of hope and help and advancement, no less. The irony is, for all the "psychiatry is nazi" blabber, Scientology is vastly more nazi-esque in execution.

Hey, how come the Freezone folks aren't allowed to exist? They share the same beliefs, only without the need for money, abuses, or disconnection policy.

It's because the people who have experienced Mr. Hubbards technology have solved the puzzles of life and feel much better. It's just too much fun to give up doing. So, when a few rant and lie, we just continue on.

You know, I've heard drug addicts say the same thing. "Dude, I can see into forever, and I understand that all the universe can fit on a pinhead. It makes everything much more vibrant and fun, I'm not going back to that scary world without it."

Making more money, having less headaches, having lasting relationships, etc. You wouldn't give it up either if it happened to you.

Making more money? Yeah, nothing says fun like making chump change after spending $360,000+ to reach OT VII! Don't forget other things like paying ~$8,000 for two E-Meters, paying for each and every auditing session, including ones that someone else thought you needed, even when you've done nothing wrong!

On the other hand we could take a look at what psychiatrists are actually doing with just psychotropics alone never mind what they are still doing with ECT and even lobotomies by googling "psychiatry psychotropics death".

ECT is an extreme treatment method, largely barred, and only used by a select few-- and only when the patient is under anesthesia, and only a small voltage for a short amount of time. In fact, any Psychology course you take in college will openly admit that there was indeed heavy experimentation during the first half of the 20th century-- and openly condemn it! Lobotomies haven't been done in decades, after someone figured out that they really don't work. You see, removing any part of the brain comes with balances-- not just mood alteration, but entire processing design is FUBAR'd.

The most done today is a split-brain operation, again a last resort, for epileptic sufferers. It does NOT cut the brain in half, but instead separate some of the connective wiring between each half of the brain, so normal functionality can be retained(and adverse effects only seen in testing conditions with specific intent), while the seizure cannot connect to the other side.

On doing so I find it sad that the FDA was brought in on claims that Scientologists were curing people with emeters while doing nothing about psychiatrists killing people with ECT, lobotomies and now psychotropics.

-"On January 4, 1963, more than one hundred E-meters were seized by US marshals at the "Founding Church of Scientology" building in Washington, D.C. The church was accused of making false claims that the devices effectively treated some 70 percent of all physical and mental illness. The FDA also charged that the devices did not bear adequate directions for treating the conditions for which they were recommended."

-The judge ordered use of the E-meter be confined to "bona fide religious counseling" and the device be prominently labeled with a warning notice:

The E-Meter is not medically or scientifically useful for the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease. It is not medically or scientifically capable of improving the health or bodily functions of anyone.

-A 1971 ruling of the United States District Court, District of Columbia (333 F. Supp. 357), specifically stated, "The E-meter has no proven usefulness in the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease, nor is it medically or scientifically capable of improving any bodily function."

See a pattern in the dates? '70s. Lobotomies were being phased out, ECT was pretty much nonexistent by then(there had been a revolution in Psychiatry/Psychology decades prior, moving from surgery and focusing more on talk/cognitive therapy.

Anti-depressants do not kill on their own. In fact, there are plenty of Psychs who abhor the over-prescription of drugs, myself included! I am in this field to change just that! I view drugs as a last resort, and the intent of these drugs from the start are as a management assistant, NOT as a cure.

AT NO POINT HAS ANY DRUG BEEN SOLD AS A CURE.

Anyone who prescribes them as a cure is probably either a quack, a moron, or is unfortunately under the thumb of the drug companies.

Scientology only seems to focus on Psychiatry during the early 20th century-- why is that? No one mentions Jung and Analytical Psychology's "talking cure", Freud and his admittedly misguided(but well-meaning) Psychoanalysis, Skinner's tests on Behaviorism(in fact, the Scientologist method of "silent birth" is fairly similar to how Skinner set up his daughter's birth-- quiet, relaxed, and lacking that spanking). There's a lack of talk of Timothy Leary, as well.

Posted by: Dio Brando at March 18, 2008 3:22 PM

Psychotic? whos psychotic? never heard of him?
Love the bit about the evil galactic emperor Lord Zeunu!
Ever considered olanzapine it may help :)

Posted by: tryin not to laugh at March 18, 2008 3:29 PM

Wow i am not surprised by the posts im reading from the people who are $cientologists. It really is intersting how sheltered they are to whats really going on with this cult. Hince the fact that $cientologists dont want them interacting with people who are non-$cientologists because they just might start to see the light about whats really happening. Shame on $cientology for not being honest to their followers, but yet want you to be completely honest with them on everything you have done in your life. The saying goes "ignorance is bliss", at the same time how blissfull is ignorance when the truth could save you life? kudo's 2 Anonymous

Posted by: spread awareness at March 18, 2008 3:58 PM

The CoS is beginning to use illegal actions against Anonymous. They are gathering information and providing falsified, unsubstantiated claims against peaceful protesters from out of context comments left in chat rooms and websites. The Gestapo mentality of this Cult is going to come to light as the protests continue and more people are innocently harassed and falsely accused.

Please Google the name Sean Carasov. There is an in-depth description of the events on encyclopediadramatica.com. For any first-time ED visitors, the site is mostly for the lulz, but this story is treated seriously (at least seriously for ED).

The CoS claims that Sean is the "leader" of Anonymous (a.k.a the Final Boss of the Internets). There IS NO LEADER of Anonymous. And if anybody ever did stand up and claim to be the leader of Anon, they would be told to STFU and/or GTFO. Or, at the very least, "pics or it didn't happen".

Violence is not only NOT involved at these protests, it is not permitted on an ethical level. But plenty of footage of CoS members/security" can be seen online where they push and physically threaten people that question or challenge them. The CoS is getting very scary with their tactics and it is going to lead to their ultimate undoing.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 18, 2008 4:32 PM

This "anonymous" group is just a bunch of kids from an imageboard site called 4chan.org harassing people yet again. I've been to this board a few times and have seen nothing but racist, anti-semitic, and misogynistic comments posted, and subsequently left when I saw some of the disgusting images that were posted on their random board, where the people claim responsibility for these attacks. Upon seeing this "anonymous attacks.." headlines, I checked this site again and there are people claiming to be part of this movement, and claiming full responsibility for everything happening by bragging to others on this random board about what they're doing.

Overall, after watching these videos and reading these articles, they're doing what kids do. Emails, telephone calls, bomb threats, etc. Nothing but kids acting like delinquents. They call themselves /b/tards (after their random board being listed as /b/) and they pretend to be an anonymous legion... in reality, they're just juvenile delinquents with too much time on their hands. It doesn't seem to be anything but kids on this site, I'd be surprised if half of them were over the age of 16 judging by the content and grammar in most of these posts.

Posted by: at March 18, 2008 4:54 PM

Does anyone see a close comparison to Jim Jones

Posted by: Wayne at March 18, 2008 4:58 PM

Mr. March 18, 2008 4:54 PM:

If they're a bunch of kids acting like delinquents, why is the Church of Scientology worried about their secrets being revealed?

Posted by: Matthew at March 18, 2008 5:39 PM

"This "anonymous" group is just a bunch of kids from an imageboard site called 4chan.org harassing people yet again."
Never been there in my life, but I was at both protests (in fact I think I'm anonymous #2, fyi it was actually a fedora).
This is bigger than you think. I suggest you rethink how you've spent the last years of your life soon - at this rate the "church's" wrongful practices will be over before you can say "omg zerg rush"

Posted by: at March 18, 2008 8:52 PM

It's good to see some members of Scientology speaking out on here (assuming they are indeed members). I don't think it is fair to attack those who attempt to open some dialog with some decency. That being said, I also don't understand why, if the "religion" is the answer to the world's problems, it is not available to the world? In the "real world" when something is good for society we teach it and share it with each other. I would also like to know if there are any educated scientists within the scientology community who have researched scientology's treatment and devices, and published peer reviewed papers even if only for internal use? It seems rather odd to me that an organization with a derivation of "science" or "to know" as its name, and that claims to base its doctrine upon facts seems to rely heavily upon faith in its descriptions on its own website. I wonder how well a scientologist member assimilates with society given that it comes across as a community that wishes to segregate itself. Are these meter devices developed by electrical engineers? If these devices are so useful for the members, would it not serve the community well to allow the market to manufacture them with some competition so as to make them more affordable to the members of the community?

Posted by: dont_tase_me_bro at March 18, 2008 9:03 PM

We left the church about a year ago and just before we were declared suppressive persons, we tried to tell two of our $cn friends what we knew about Miscavige and the other abuses of the church. They did not believe us or they made up reasons why the things we told them would be okay. Like, "well, Miscavige might have to beat someone up to get them to do their work -- he must have had his reasons." Oh. My. God. We were stunned. After we were declared, we ran into this person (who had been a good friend for years) at a hamburger joint. She wouldn't even smile at us. Nothing.

I feel really sorry for the folks at the bottom. They don't know what's going on and they have no way of finding out. They can't read newspapers or surf the web. They are not allowed to hear criticism of their church. They learn very early how to tune it out and ascribe it all to the enemies who are trying to destroy our church BECAUSE WE ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO CAN HELP THE WORLD. I know what that feels like. I did it too, for many years. I knew that anyone like anonymous was an enemy and they were trying to destroy us because we were the good guys and somehow no one wanted us good guys to keep going.

As for the $cnists who show up in places like this and leave remarks about "loving being a Scientologist" or "psychs are ruining the world" or "anonymous is all geeky kids", they HAVE TO do these kinds of things. It's their job. And they can't have conversations. They will not have an exchange with anyone. They can't actually think for themselves. Each comment is cleared with a boss before it's posted. And they just want to get a rise out of anyone they can, to divert attention. I say, ignore them. IMHO.

Posted by: rinderblewsocanyou at March 18, 2008 9:06 PM

in regards to the guy saying that the Anonymous people are a bunch of people that hang out on imageboards... how exactly does that change whether or not their message is true or not?

An underage dancing clown that is saying the truth is STILL saying the truth.

Posted by: David at March 18, 2008 9:38 PM

Stephen said, "The Church only counts persons who have done a course or have received auditing. We don't count ex members"

-- and that's the point where I started laughing. Says who, Stephen? Says who? Are you claiming that you yourself have checked out all Scientology memberships, all allegedly eight million of them, in order to verify that none of them are ex-members or people who only took the "free" personality test? Because if you're not doing that, I don't see how you could possibly know that Scientology isn't inflating its counts, let alone how your declaration that Scientology isn't inflating its counts could be credible enough to stand up to the first-hand reports we are hearing from ex-Scientologists that reports of member counts were deliberately done counting not only ex-members, but deceased persons.

Posted by: AF at March 18, 2008 10:12 PM

Saying Anonymous is /b/ is, at best, using out of date information, and at worst yet another smear attempt against Anonymous. Combined with the accusation of harassing people, I personally am very disinclined to look on the unsigned statement made at 4:32pm in a positive light.

Even before this year, Anonymous was more than just /b/, they're just the ones that had the most visibility due to their (occasionally outrageous) actions. Especially now, /b/ is only a part of Anonymous, and arguably a small one. People from just about every walk of life have, do, and will participate in the campaign against the abuses by the organization styling itself as "the church of Scientology". Many of them have never even heard of 4chan, let alone /b/. Some of those now making up Anonymous even come from online groups against whom /b/ has had longstanding hostility.

As for the "young punks" implication, look at any of the protest videos on Youtube (assuming the site isn't blocked as a source of entheta). Are there young people involved? Yes (and doesn't them getting involved in their world sound better than apathy?). But you'll also notice, even with faces partially concealed by masks, that there are a fair number of older folks, too.

In short, "just a bunch of kids
from [...] 4chan" = bovine excrement. Worse than BS, even, as at least the real thing can be used for fertilizer, unlike its virtual counterpart.

Posted by: anotheranonymous at March 18, 2008 10:42 PM

Matthew: The CoS is worried because Anonymous -is- leaking out their "secrets", and more and more people are becoming aware of the issue.
Anonymous might be "a bunch of kids acting like delinquents" in your perspective, but they must be doing something right.

Posted by: Anoynymause at March 18, 2008 10:54 PM

The Church of $cientology is very afraid. That's why they're taking pictures and recording video. That's why they are planting protestors. That's why they are labeling Anonymous as a cyber-terrorist organization.

They know the truth hurts and they can't handle the truth. That's why they're suppressing Anonymous and all their other critics.

Posted by: David at March 18, 2008 10:58 PM

"But plenty of footage of CoS members/security" can be seen online where they push and physically threaten people that question or challenge them. The CoS is getting very scary with their tactics and it is going to lead to their ultimate undoing."

Very true. I'd known for over a decade about the Church of Scientology's morality shell game ("Hey! Want to join the most ethical group on the planet? Great! Oh, by the way, when we said 'ethical', what we actually meant was 'self-serving'; Scientology ethics means 'doing what's best for Scientology' -- but don't worry, what's good for Scientology is good for the planet! The same people who promised you'd be part of the most ethical group on the planet, knowing you didn't understand what our promise to you really meant in our private language, guarantee that Scientology is still all hearts and flowers and warm fuzzy kitties anyways, whee!") Yet I was still shocked the first time I saw the infamous "dirty little gnat with secrets" video. The anger on the faces, the venom in the voices spilling the words that make no sense unless you've already bought into the paranoid fantasy that is Scientology -- it's a frightening glimpse of fanaticism in action.

Posted by: AF at March 18, 2008 11:10 PM

I wish I would've come to the protests but feel to old around all those 20-year-olds!

Scientology is a ridiculous organization; the jargon they use ("data," "entheta," "sector" and the like) is an embarrassing attempt to make people unthinkingly reciting dogma sound "knowledgeable." The campaign against "psychs" is laughable- they actually take the position that brain chemistry is irrelevant. They send high-school dropout Cruise to lecture the world on how these MDs with years of training are pure evil and don't know what they are doing. Hey, $cios, how well did that all work out for Jeremy Perkins's mom?

The real threat that Anonymous poses to Scientology is not bomb threats (I don't believe for a moment that $cio didn't "fair game" all that up themselves). It is LAUGHTER. Make a joke out of the idiotic pretensions to knowledge that this half-baked cult espouses to the gullible, and they will melt away in respectability. And by "make a joke out of" I mean that all you really have to do is simply RECITE WHAT THEY ACTUALLY BELIEVE. The more people know what they are about before being pitched by $cios, the fewer will react to CO$ with anything but laughter.

Posted by: Richard at March 18, 2008 11:25 PM

I am Anonymous and I do not visit 4chan or any of the other #chan websites. Frankly, those sites creep me out.

In fact, every other Anonymous I know is not from a #chan site.

While channers may be a portion of Anonymous, they are by no means the entirety of the group.

The Anonymous of the protests is not the Anonymous of 4chan any longer. It has grown and matured and become something greater than any singular demographic.

Anonymous is more than just a group of people; it is an idea, a purpose, and a desire for freedom and human equality with the morale only the inner child can provide.

Anonymous is perhaps the ultimate example of equality. With no leaders, no personal identities, no names, and no ranks, no socio-economic statuses, every Anon. is on par with every other Anon.

No single Anonymous can represent the collective group, and as such, if the general opinion of Anonymous is that my statements are incorrect, than everything I've written here is moot.

Posted by: me at March 19, 2008 12:07 AM

I'm Anonymous.
I am 32 Years Old.
I haven't used #chan for about a decade now.
I don't have a mom to ground me so save your video.
I don't have a short attention span, so I'm not getting bored.
There are a lot just like me.
While it may have started as what you described, it has grown in a way you can only claim that your cult has.
Expect us.
We are multiplying.
We see through your misdirection.
Soon, the media and law enforcement will as well.
Pay your taxes.
Quit breaking families apart.
Stop your Bull$hitting.
Wake up.
Free yourself.
It starts, as all things do, with education.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 19, 2008 1:20 AM

Well, we have President Clinton to thank for their Tax Exempt status. It was not one of his "First 100 days" priorities, but his "First 7 days" accomplishments. Wonder what sort of contact Hillary has with them, or do they just procure women for Bill?

Posted by: XemuSpawn at March 19, 2008 1:34 AM

Hey Dio. I am on OT VII and it's a blast. I don't work for OSA or the church. Its nice to hear from some that you are not attacking our beleifs. Well good night. Time for a peaceful sleep.

Posted by: Stephen Paul Reid at March 19, 2008 4:13 AM

Fortunately I live in a city that, from what I know, is still free from the AIDS that is this cult; unfortunately, it also meant there was no partying hard to be had over here (and no cake).

Nonetheless, I shall do my part and try to spread the word, as much as I can, to help keep my city Co$-free.

The Force be with you, Anonymous.

Posted by: IRL Nabeshin at March 19, 2008 8:38 AM

To Steve, Augustus, Curiouser, Stephen Paul Reid and all the scientologist douche bags here, RIGHT! Scientology has changed its ways! BULLSHIT! At both protests here in Tucson your pathetic afterbirths of the OSA tried to follow and photograph protesters after the event. The local police know about you and your policies and pulled over your OSA trash and ticketed them for stalking among other things. If your criminal org. has changed so much then why is this still going on? A warning to you, Fair Game can be played on you and your leaders and OSA as well. Beware.

Posted by: Centurian 10 at March 19, 2008 9:48 AM

“Did you see those kids? The little girl can’t be older than six,”

This Anonymous thinks sm all kids at peaceful demonstrations are probably OK but they shouldn't be holding up signs unless they are old enough to understand them. Really now.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 19, 2008 11:24 AM

As a Scientology parishioner, I have gotten to endure the “anonymous” attacks on my church. So why the big lie about it’s not against the members of Scientology? The only evil wrong-doers “anonymous” is facing up to are themselves in a mirror. You’re cowards. I still go to my church. I’m not a coward. I’m still doing Scientology. And please don’t come back with the generality “It’s the church!” Meaning me, but you want to make it out that there is a big bugaboo somewhere you are talking about. Put up or shut up on your allegations. And that doesn’t more invective for me.

Posted by: anonymous scientologist at March 19, 2008 11:46 AM

Two copypastas! Ah ahahah! The second of which is circulating the internets at this very moment at Glosslip and Infoworld. Where to next, anonymous scientologist?

Posted by: Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! at March 19, 2008 12:45 PM

I guess I could copypasta my reply to anonymous scientologist...

@anonymous scientologist

“As a Scientology parishioner, I have gotten to endure the “anonymous” attacks on my church.”

You should have put “attacks” in quotes, not Anonymous. There haven’t been any attacks alluded to by your writing tone unless you consider assembling and protesting and disseminating information an attack.

“So why the big lie about it’s not against the members of Scientology?”

Uhm, you just said in your previous sentence, “attacks on my church”. A lot of us may not agree with or find humor in what you believe but we really aren’t aginst you believing in it. I personally don’t see it as any stranger than Christian mythologies or belief in prayer or faith healing. In reality it’s really not any different than any religion except for the way it operates. If we were against the beliefs, why would we promote and have the support of the Freezoners?

“The only evil wrong-doers “anonymous” is facing up to are themselves in a mirror. You’re cowards.”

Sciplant attacks…next.

“I still go to my church. I’m not a coward.”

Have you personally investigated any of our claims or do you just believe what you are spoon fed? You’ll find that, if you do try and thoroughly investigate these things, you’ll be sec checked, named a PTS, and possibly sent to the RPF. I’d say you’re the coward for not bothering to find answers for yourself…which is rather ironic considering that it’s one of the tenets of Scientology.

“And please don’t come back with the generality “It’s the church!” Meaning me, but you want to make it out that there is a big bugaboo somewhere you are talking about.”

If making yourself the victim in this allows you to turn a blind eye to the allegations leveled at your Church and it’s leaders, then so be it. But, Anonymous doesn’t mean any members any harm. EVEN the staff that are screwing things up for you. There is an ultimatim echoed in every corner of the internets and in every mask at the protests: reform or collapse. We are only expediting the Churches arrival at one or the other, all the damage is self inflicted…we just shined a light on it.

“Put up or shut up on your allegations.”

All in due time. Get the paper shredders fired up lads and lasses, you’ve got visitors.

“And that doesn’t mean me, you vicious bleaters.”

Funny how you essentially martyred yourself and made us look like the bad guys while simultaneously issuing attack after attack. Bravo, you really are the very model of a modern Scientologist. I’d like to see more people initiate in level-headed debate on par with Billy Sheehan from the wise beard man videos. He adamantly denied all allegations and wouldn’t talk about most of the things he was asked but at least he was pleasant.

Posted by: Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! at March 19, 2008 12:48 PM

I am an anonymous scientologist! Ain't it great. You can't find me or know who I am. I read a Scientology book today. Oh my. Maybe I walked by you in the street. How would you know?

Posted by: anonymous scientologist at March 19, 2008 2:05 PM

Oh, I did not do this: "Funny how you essentially martyred yourself and made us look like the bad guys while simultaneously issuing attack after attack. "

You poor guy. Forgive me for standing up for myself. Your intentions are plain. I do not wish to listen to you anymore. Thank goodness I'm anonymous here. Goodbye.

Posted by: anonymous scientologist at March 19, 2008 2:15 PM

I'm glad people are finally showing the true colors of Scientology. From the wise words of ADMIRAL ACKBAR "It's A TRAP!!!!!"

Posted by: at March 19, 2008 3:09 PM

I am an anonymous scientologist! Ain't it great. You can't find me or know who I am. I read a Scientology book today. Oh my. Maybe I walked by you in the street. How would you know?

I don't know. And I don't care. I'm not afraid of you nor am I (or any other)Anonymous after you. If you're OSA, RTC, or QRSTUV I could care less either. I'm not afraid of you nor am I after you. What I am after is the human rights violations conducted under the guise of religion. If you are knowingly involved in these crimes, you should be worried, but not about Anonymous, you should be worried about the shitstorm that's coming in the form of public backlash followed by goverment investigations. You can't stop what is happening. And, if there's the slightest chance that the allegations against the Church are true, being the good intentioned Scientologist you claim to be, why would you want to stop it?

Posted by: Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! at March 19, 2008 3:13 PM

Oh, I did not do this: "Funny how you essentially martyred yourself and made us look like the bad guys while simultaneously issuing attack after attack."

Really? Which part? The martyrdom? You claimed to have "endure[d] the anonymous attacks on [your] church" and later say "the church meaning me". That sounds to me that you've pretty much named yourself as a martyr. Also, from Wikipedia:

The word "martyr" is also used ironically in casual conversation to refer to someone who seeks attention or sympathy by exaggerating the impact upon himself of some deprivation or work.

That pretty much sums up my use of the word, eh?

On to the attacks since you weren't clear on which "thing" you didn't do. Since an attack in this case can be classified generally as any antagonism, here we go:

So why the big lie about it's not against the members of Scientology?

In one sentence you called Anon liars and implied that we were against the members of the church regardless of SEVERAL testimonies stating otherwise. So, can we call namecalling and slander/defamation of character an attack? Yes.

The only evil wrong-doers anonymous is facing up to are themselves in a mirror.

Now we're evil wrong-doers. More name calling. Next.

You're cowards.

3 sentences back to back to back. You're on a roll. Next.

you want to make it out that there is a big bugaboo somewhere

Now we're back to being liars...NEXT.

Put up or shut up

Sounds like a challenge. A somewhat hostile one at that. Attack? Methinks so. Next.

And that doesn’t mean me, you vicious bleaters

Although it didn't show up here because your copypasta failed, this is on all the other sites that you've spammed the message on, so...yeah, next?

Posted by: at March 19, 2008 3:35 PM

One father brought his two young children to the protest, both of whom carried signs denouncing the Church. “Did you see those kids? The little girl can’t be older than six,” said one “Anon” to another in glee. “That’s fucking awesome!”

lol pedophiles

Posted by: 4chan at March 19, 2008 8:50 PM

"As far as what I know of Operation Snow White and Operation Freakout these were simply criminal acts committed by overzealous people who felt justified because their religion was being attacked and as much as those attacks consisted of libel,"

Who says? If it had actually been libel, they could have gone to court and proven it to be libel. What gave them the right to conduct the single largest domestic infiltration of the government in United States history to tamper with government files? Do you think for one minute that if they had gone to court and proven their allegations about libel, that any court in the land would have awarded them access to 100,000 pages of government records as a result? No? Then how can they be justified in committing a massive campaign of burglary in order to award themselves possession of those pages?

Yes, I know you said that they felt justified, not that they were justified. That's exactly the point. Just about everyone who commits crimes justifies them to themselves somehow; the Scientologists' still-unsupported claim that there was libel somewhere in the government's files doesn't make them one bit better than common criminals.

Nor can it excuse the true scope of Operation Snow White, which was in fact far, far beyond merely removing false information". The Scientology defendants offered that excuse, and the Court ripped it to shreds by showing the plan for "Operation Cat", which aimed "to hold up the American security to ridicule, as outlined in the GO [Guardian's Office] by LRH [L. Ron Hubbard]" by "plant[ing] grossly false information in governmental agencies". And "Operation Juicy Clanger" had nothing to do whatever with allegedly false information about Scientology; that was a scheme to just plain blackmail the IRS, using tax records that Scientology had stolen of people like Frank Sinatra, Doris Day, and Edmund Brown, the Governor of California. What made those "overzealous people" feel "justified" in stealing the tax records of people who were in no way involved in any conflict between Scientology and the government and using them in a blackmail scheme?

Now you may say "That was so many years ago; why should that concern me now?" Here's why: your church still does not acknowledge its wrongdoing. I have no idea what you could be referring to when you claim the CoS "cooperated with authorities to put those people in jail", when did it allegedly do that? Because I know the CoS raised money for the defense of those "overzealous" people (probably illegally, since most of the donors to the "Safe Environment Fund" weren't actually told that their donations were going to defend the Snow White defendants) but I can't think of a single way in which the CoS "cooperated with authorities" in the Snow White case.

And your church does not acknowledge its wrongdoing. Your Church doesn't call the eleven high-ranking Scientologists who went to prison for Operation Snow White "overzealous". It claims that the Guardian's Office was "infiltrated and set up to fail". That's right; the Church's official position today is that the Snow White eleven -- the same defendants for whom the Church raised funds -- were actually infiltrators and enemies of the Church. Includingly, presumably, Mary Sue Hubbard herself. You seem to be able to grasp the idea that people who have good intentions can go too far and do wrong but your Church can not. Your Church has yet to admit that it was Scientologists acting on behalf of Scientology that committed the egregious violations against the law, against the government, and against the privacy of individual citizens.

The Church of Scientology claims that its aim is a world without war, insanity, or criminals. Aren't criminals who come up with some 'justification' for their illegal acts still just criminals? Isn't it insanity when you simply cannot ever admit that your group was in the wrong, and have to pretend that the responsibility for the wrong lies in some outside Other?

Posted by: AF at March 19, 2008 11:20 PM

I'm a 43 year old professional engineer and I am anonymous. Before Jan. 16th I had never even heard of 'anonymous', /b/ or the chans (or was even familiar with the memes). However I was very familiar with the CofS and its unscrupulous methods of dealing with critics and ex-members. I was very aware of the special tax exempt status afforded to the both the church and its parishioners, something no other recognized religion has, and I was aware of the crimes and deaths associated with the Church. Until now, many people like myself did not know what to do reasonably, many were afraid to expose themselves and families to the possibility of 'fair game'. Anonymous has changed that, people are emboldened to stand up and do what part they can. Anonymous faces the Church of Scientology on many fronts. There are anonymous who are practicing a viral campaign, posting 3,600,000 stickers, flyers, and informational cards advertising critical information about the cult. There are anonymous who have contacted 1000's of scientologists via social networking websites, in the hopes that just a few maybe need the resources to get out. There are anonymous who focus effort on IRL raids, protesting the church and and putting their very non-anonymity on the line. There are anonymous who write letters to senators and congressmen concerning tax exemptions and other human rights abuses of the church. There are anonymous who are providing the Church's leaked documents, internal emails, and financial data to the media, the FBI, the IRS, and the DoJ. The list goes on. The Church will end, but the religion of scientology will go on. To Scientologists posting here, you must realize that worship in your religion does not need to mean being constantly charged for instructional materials and auditing. The are MANY scientologist outside the church who practice LRH tech without the constant pressure of regging. Google 'freezone'.

Disconnected scientologists, call your freinds and family. They miss you and will be happy to hear from you.

1. DISCONNECTION should NOT be any religions POLICY.
2. KSW is gone, it is all David Miscavige now, crashing the stats.
3. RTC is off policy.
4. Command Lines are off policy.
5. Knowing how to KNOW, is knowing when to BLOW.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 20, 2008 2:18 AM

As far as I remember, it was only one person who was a plant, and it was not Mary Sue Hubbard, who is a sweet, wonderful person.

There is a certain type of person who attacks good people and good groups, and defends barbaric groups such as psychiatry.

Seen one of those around lately?

Posted by: Stephen Paul Reid at March 20, 2008 2:32 AM

"As far as I remember, it was only one person who was a plant, and it was not Mary Sue Hubbard, who is a sweet, wonderful person."

On the one hand, I have your assurance that Mary Sue Hubbard was a "sweet, wonderful person". On the other hand, Mary Sue Hubbard was a major player behind Operation Snow White, and even for those who mistakenly believe that it's okay to commit domestic espionage operations against the government as long as you allege that the government is part of a big conspiracy against you, Mary Sue Hubbard is the person who authored Guardian's Office order GO 121669, the one that authorized and ordered the Guardian's Office to go through "preclear files". You know what those are, right? Those are where the deepest secrets that you disclose during auditing are written down? You know those, the ones that you and everyone else undergoing auditing were falsely assured would be confidential? Oh please, please, do tell us just what justified Mary Sue Hubbard, that "nice, sweet person", in ordering that betrayal.

Posted by: AF at March 20, 2008 9:22 PM

I am an anonymous scientologist! Ain't it great. You can't find me or know who I am. I read a Scientology book today. Oh my. Maybe I walked by you in the street. How would you know?

Actually, if we really wanted to, we'd just find your IP address, and work from there.

As far as I remember, it was only one person who was a plant, and it was not Mary Sue Hubbard, who is a sweet, wonderful person.

Then you must not know or remember much. Mary Sue was so nice, she helped break into the IRS!

There is a certain type of person who attacks good people and good groups, and defends barbaric groups such as psychiatry.

I'm not going to copypasta the same old "you DO realize that most experimental treatments from the early 20th century are no longer in use, PLUS PSYCHIATRY IS NOT ALWAYS DONE WITH DRUGS", but instead laugh as I remember how Scientology has lead to numerous deaths, none of them carried out under any drug influence.

Posted by: Dio Brando at March 20, 2008 11:57 PM

I loved your story. Bravo for the truth!!

Posted by: Dee at March 21, 2008 12:28 PM

The Church of Scientology is being attacked like many other organizations have been, it is not new. I have known about them for now 8 years and have read from numerous of their books and have encountered a genuine attempt to educate and awaken people from a sleeplike condition many of US have had concerning the state of our current society.

When a society has been gradually duped into a belief that social chaos is "normal" and it simply "occurs" and that there isn't anyone actively ceating this confusion (surely for financial gains)the society doesn't realize there is even hope for anything different. Our "reality" seems unchangeable or bearly changeable. When a group like the scientologists come to shift that paradigm...shake some ground under our feet!!! BOOM BOOM BOOM! the mess starts!

I know there are MULTIBILLION dollar companies behind the attack on the church of Scientology! These "ANNONYMOUS" are but a sign of the insidious forms these attacks take! These companies have often kept (w/ their money and influence) us simply fooled!

I know the Church (maybe not perfect, of course) but I KNOW THEM, their members, their intentions, their ideals and it is VERY VERY respectable! it deserves nothing but an intelligent look before one jumps into ill-informed conclusions!!! I gave it a try and so should all us!

Posted by: JC at March 21, 2008 2:00 PM

"I know there are MULTIBILLION dollar companies behind the attack on the church of Scientology!"
Proof? Do you have evidence of this?

Thanks for the laugh, but I think your tinfoil hat is on a bit too tight.

Posted by: N/A at March 21, 2008 6:06 PM

"When a society has been gradually duped into a belief that social chaos is "normal" and it simply "occurs" and that there isn't anyone actively ceating this confusion (surely for financial gains)the society doesn't realize there is even hope for anything different. ...

I know there are MULTIBILLION dollar companies behind the attack on the church of Scientology! These "ANNONYMOUS" are but a sign of the insidious forms these attacks take! These companies have often kept (w/ their money and influence) us simply fooled!"

For the Scientologists, it's the "MULTIBILLION dollar companies". For the Nazis, it was "the Jewish bankers". And in the Middle Ages, of course, it was the witches. "We've all been duped into thinking that the bubonic plague just occurred! Obviously there's someone actively creating this disease for financial gain! So all we have to do is dispose of Old Goody Hopkins, quietly and without sorrow, and things will get better -- remember, something can be done about it!" I looked into the Church of Scientology, JC, and what I saw was just another snake-oil-selling scam outfit, offering nothing but pseudoscience and paranoia. No thanks, the world doesn't benefit from that.

Posted by: AF at March 21, 2008 10:07 PM

I know there are MULTIBILLION dollar companies behind the attack on the church of Scientology! These "ANNONYMOUS" are but a sign of the insidious forms these attacks take! These companies have often kept (w/ their money and influence) us simply fooled!

Seriously? Well damn, where's my money? Also, someone alert the owners of the sites that Anonymous collectively came from, and tell them to never worry about server costs again!

When a society has been gradually duped into a belief that social chaos is "normal" and it simply "occurs" and that there isn't anyone actively ceating this confusion (surely for financial gains)the society doesn't realize there is even hope for anything different.

social chaos != peaceful protests

Posted by: Dio Brando at March 22, 2008 12:06 AM

Thank you JC for a breath of sanity in this howling sea. You're correct in assuming that the psychs and the drug companies are always at the bottom of these attacks. Pretty soon the church will give these young people enough evidence to at least cause them to pause and ask themselves who has been stoking the flames.

Posted by: Stephen Paul Reid at March 22, 2008 2:41 AM

great article is great article

i lol'd

Posted by: anon and onanon at March 22, 2008 1:41 PM

I enjoyed the article, but what really got me off was some of the