Daily Voice «

» Runnin' Scared «

a Voice news blog

update notifications

email

subscribe
unsubscribe

categories

Anons Go Unmasked at Latest Scientology Protest

Posted by Candice M. Giove at 12:46 PM, May 12, 2008

At Saturday’s “Operation: Fair Game: Stop,” Anonymous’ latest installment in a series of monthly global protests, one local member abandoned his ridiculous three-pronged disguise of glasses, a fake nose and a mustache. Instead Mike Vitale wore his name in white letters emblazoned across a black cotton T-shirt.

For Vitale, it’s no longer necessary to obscure his face with the cheap gag getup. The Church of Scientology already knows who he is and where he lives. Days before the protest focusing on “fair game,” the method L. Ron Hubbard concocted in 1967 to silence critics, Vitale received an ominous and vague letter from a Church of Scientology-connected law firm threatening legal action against him for his involvement with Anonymous. “People were definitely quite concerned,” he said of his fellow Anons. “I got asked more than a few times if this means I’m going to cut out.”

But he arrived, undeterred by the warning or the creepiness that the Church of Scientology learned of his once-guarded identity.

The move didn’t rattle other Anons who assembled across from The Church of Scientology’s New York headquarters on West 46th Street either. “From the start people were always afraid, but I what I’m seeing is that people are letting go of that fear more,” said Desu, who wore a shirt with Anonymous’ headless suited emblem and his Guy Fawkes mask relaxed around his neck. “Some of them are not even wearing a mask or sunglasses.”

Many were even more defiant, saying hello to a conspicuous video camera parked in a window at the org. Annie, a member from Long Island, ferociously waved up at its lens. Though known online as Pentagram she applied for the group’s protest permit last month, which requires disclosure of information members try so hard to conceal: name and address. She claimed that about two weeks ago she was photographed by a mysterious trench coat wearing woman near her home. “I live way out on Long Island, so if they want to waste their gas and drive two hours to snap pictures of me I’ll give them a cup of coffee,” she laughed.

DeMiNe0, the administrator of epicanon.com, the main community site for NYC Anons, also ditched his disguise. In the past month he has received two “cease and desist” letters from Church of Scientology lawyers. “They even put fake information in these cease and desist letters,” DiMiNe0 said, talking of references to threats the Church of Scientology claims Anons have made. “Who are they trying to fool? I am one of the people who researches this type of thing every day.”

Protestors stood on West 46th Street in front of the church and also positioned themselves on Broadway, where they were able to get a sound permit. They invoked Hubbard’s words from a 1967 “fair game” policy letter. Critics, “May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed." Though the organization no longer refers to the policy as “fair game,” because Hubbard said a year later it made for a bad public image, Anonymous members and other critics say it’s clearly still in play.

In the past the Church of Scientology “fair-gamed” many detractors, most notably Paulette Cooper, a journalist who published a scathing book about the church in 1971 called The Scandal of Scientology. Church members later devised Operation Freakout to deal with the author. They flung 19 lawsuits her way and got her arrested on criminal charges. Through deception they managed to obtain her fingerprints on paper, type up a bomb threat, and mail it to a government official. She faced 15 years in prison, until the “fair game” policy and other documents came to light.

Anons tell her story to those willing to listen. Others shout slogans or hand out pamphlets about Scientology. At the Broadway protest site, LazyKid holds up a hand-written, abbreviated story of Xenu—the galactic ruler whose population control method has had lasting effects on man according to Church of Scientology belief. The story is also something that its members wait years to hear, only after paying thousands of dollars for courses and auditing.

“I thought that was just some weird version of Christianity,” a man says when he stops to read the sign. He looks at it incredulously. “I could make up something better than that,” he said as he walked off.

With Anonymous positioned on a crowded Times Square drag, several young, polished looking church members stood steps away from the signs and screams. They held stacks of Dianetics postcards, and tried to coax people to come to the center to watch a 15 minute film.

Tourists and New Yorkers walked down the corridor of proselytizers and protestors. But it seemed difficult for church staff to dispense their cards while Anons stood there, not to mention the many recent embarrassments suffered by Scientology after prominent defectors like church leader David Miscavige’s niece Jenna Hill Miscavige and actor Jason Beghe spoke out.

A young Church staff member smiled and handed a woman a card as she walked through the spectacle. Anonymous members shrieked their slogans. The stranger lightly shoved the card back into his hand.

“Give it back! Give it back! Give it back!” A new chant was born.

more: Anonymous

comments

i want to have sex with this blog.

EPIC WIN!!!!!!!

see you all on june 12th!!!

Posted by: AWESOME at May 12, 2008 1:33 PM

It will be June 14, not June 12! See you on June 14! And thank you, Village Voice, for continuing to cover this story. Another great article!

Posted by: L.T. Catnarok at May 12, 2008 2:09 PM

I would wear a T-shirt saying...
"NO, I'm Mike Vitale!" just to confuse and enturbulate the scilons, but alas the nearest borg is a 5 or 6 hour drive away. :( :))

EPIC WIN!!!!1!

Posted by: AnonBystander at May 12, 2008 2:25 PM

I think you mean JUNE 14TH!!!!
Sea Arrrgh vs the Sea Org.
Worldwide protest against the human rights abuses happening in Scientology's Sea Organization.

I love the Village Voice too, full of brave journalists who aren't afraid to tell it like it is.

Posted by: BegheForMI4 at May 12, 2008 3:14 PM

No! I'm Spartacus!

No, I;m Spartacus!

Posted by: KingAz at May 12, 2008 3:32 PM

Thank you!! This blog gave me wood!!!

Posted by: Ten Tigers at May 12, 2008 3:35 PM

i just wanted to say thank you al, for your continuing coverage.

Posted by: al at May 12, 2008 3:37 PM

It makes me giddy to see scientology's intimidation tactics backfire on them so badly.

Scientology: Boo!
Anonymous: Lulz. Bite me.

Great story!

Posted by: David Mudkips at May 12, 2008 3:38 PM

Wonderful article and I must say I respect those who have been outed. Let Scientology learn that their threatening letters have no ground to stand on and so it rightfully shouldn't scare people away from doing what they should be, protesting this cult.

Posted by: Henk de Vries at May 12, 2008 3:39 PM

Good read, good article, see you all June 14th.

Posted by: Jason at May 12, 2008 3:45 PM

A wonderful article! I'm so glad The Voice has the balls to report on the efforts of Anonymous.

See you all at the Sea Aarrgh!

Posted by: Howe I. Shotweb at May 12, 2008 3:45 PM

Thank you Candice for a very informative article. It answered many of my questions. I was a passerby on Saturday and my interest was piqued. God bless these young people. They have great courage. What an awful organization scientology is. I hope all the members and workers can see the light and walk away before they are abused any longer.

Posted by: anonMom I guess at May 12, 2008 3:51 PM

Thank you for this:

"In the past the Church of Scientology “fair-gamed” many detractors, most notably Paulette Cooper, a journalist who published a scathing book about the church in 1971 called The Scandal of Scientology. Church members later devised Operation Freakout to deal with the author. They flung 19 lawsuits her way and got her arrested on criminal charges. Through deception they managed to obtain her fingerprints on paper, type up a bomb threat, and mail it to a government official. She faced 15 years in prison, until the “fair game” policy and other documents came to light."

Really, this stuff needs to be made public, also working conditions in Sea Org and all the rest that is there. Thank you so much.

Posted by: reader at May 12, 2008 3:57 PM

BEST BLOG EVARRRRRRRR

We lurrve you lotz! :D :D :D :D

Posted by: anonymai at May 12, 2008 3:58 PM

Splendid article, once again! Kudos to the author.

Posted by: Shawn Lonsdale at May 12, 2008 3:58 PM

Excellent article. I had no idea Anons were now going maskless because they'd received those 'cease and desist letters'.

It's really ironic that they would receive those just in time for the protest against Fair Game.

No religion needs a secret service (google OSA), no religion needs a navy (google Sea Org), and more importantly, no legitimate religion needs to intimidate its critics.

Posted by: Marc Abian at May 12, 2008 3:59 PM

You spelt my name wrong its Lazy Kitten

Posted by: Lazykitten at May 12, 2008 5:15 PM

When I had that shirt printed a few years ago, I knew it would come in ultra handy one day.

Posted by: Mike Vitale at May 12, 2008 5:26 PM

Thanks village voice. You guys have balls of steel posting what you post. I'm curious as to how Scientology has reacted to you.

Once you look up all the abuses, there's no way you can keep quiet. I really encourage people to read up on these abuses and criminal activities done by the church. It's really not conspiracy theories like they will have you believe.

Posted by: Anonybrom at May 12, 2008 5:36 PM

Yawn. Anon protest in Clearwater down from 125 to 38. Worldwide huge drops. When i asked a few "why are you here"> Answer: "It's a party, man!". Houston Anon answers "It's better than watching porn". Some of these kids think they are fighting abuses. What they are fighting is an organization passionate about drug abuse, literacy and a culture of self-determined individuals.

Posted by: Steve at May 12, 2008 7:15 PM

Great article! :)

May the coming months see many more in this vain, to help bring about Scientology's worst nightmare: an informed public.

Posted by: MightyTiny at May 12, 2008 7:35 PM

Mike Vitale. He kinda looks like me. I kinda could have been in his place. And Steve, don't give us your shit about Scientology being about self-improvement, Dale Carnegie's good enough for that. Talk about Noah Lottick, Kaja Ballo and Martine Boulbil and people will start taking you seriously.

I mean, gosh. One murder, one suicide and one kidnapping. Call the lawyers already.

Posted by: David Mudkips at May 12, 2008 8:01 PM

Epic Article is Epic.

Posted by: longcat at May 12, 2008 8:05 PM

Fantastic! Many Internets to the unmasked anon, as well as to this blog!

See us all on June 12th for Sea Org: Sea Arrrgh!

Posted by: anon4621 at May 12, 2008 8:09 PM

Thank you to the Village Voice - you stand alone among many news outlets! Courageous!
Again, thank you. Hey - why don't you come again on June 14th!

Posted by: Anonymous at May 12, 2008 8:12 PM

Hey did anyone else catch Colbert shouting Hail Xenu into space a few days ago?

Posted by: anondon at May 12, 2008 8:42 PM

Awsome.

Posted by: Janon at May 12, 2008 10:27 PM

Yo David, More BS from you. If your team is so tried and true where are the lawsuits. Zero. That's because you can spew hatred on blogs but you can't lie in a courtroom. You have to prove something. I've been a Scientologist for over 30 years and you know zero about it other than the misconceptions you have in your head or your read in the gossips. It's pointless for me to tell you the truth as your filled with fixed ideas, but check back in five years. Try this: www.dianetics.org. One good thing about Anon, I've seen nearly 1000 people sign up for services here in CW over he past two months. thanks for the publicity.

Posted by: Steve at May 12, 2008 11:42 PM

Considering how May is finals months, many people couldn't be out there to protest.


but don't at all think that we'll just trickle down to nothing Steve.


This summer is going to be huge.

Posted by: TheModernSky at May 13, 2008 12:12 AM

great article VV!
get informed, join the raid on june 14. do it!

enturbulation.org
xenu.net
lermanet.com

Posted by: lawbster at May 13, 2008 3:54 AM

Hi Steve,

"Some of these kids think they are fighting abuses. What they are fighting is an organization passionate about drug abuse, literacy and a culture of self-determined individuals."

Thanks for your comment, as it is the first pro-Scientology comment I've seen on the web which does admit to the possibility that there are -misguided- moral reasons behind some of the people protesting. Such a thing can be the beginning of a much better understanding of each others' positions, it's so much better than accusations of terrorism/KKK/communism/bigotry which produce nothing but further resentment. On the other hand, a lot of anons understand that a lot of Scientologists are about helping people, seriously trying to save the planet from perceived enemies/"the psychs" and that their enthusiasm and willingness to sacrifice is being misused by the organization as a source of money and to extend its influence.

Honestly, even though I absolutely disagree with you on the nature of Scientology, this is one of the best comments I have read in days, because it shows there need not be pure confrontation. So thank you once again.

Posted by: reader at May 13, 2008 7:34 AM

love it!! Village voice, keep up the good work. And Anonymous, dont stop what your doing.

Posted by: Lady Catherineh at May 13, 2008 10:30 AM

All that is needed to join Anonymous is the desire to fight a destructive and dangerous cult. Whether you are East Coast or West Coast, link up at www.enturbulation.org and join the fight.

Thanks VV for being a voice of reason when other outlets are taking the money and running. (i.e. youtube).

Posted by: AnonymousNow at May 13, 2008 10:31 AM

HIS NAME IS ROBERT PAULSON!
HIS NAME IS ROBERT PAULSON!
HIS NAME IS ROBERT PAULSON!
HIS NAME IS ROBERT PAULSON!
HIS NAME IS ROBERT PAULSON!


great blog.

Posted by: David Mudkipz at May 13, 2008 10:46 AM

@reader. Thanks for your comment. Your point is well taken. If a person doesn't want to get involved in Scientology, the simple answer is don't. The theology and actual technology however is contained in Hubbard's books, not on th gossip columns. What I see there is so far from what Hubbard says in his books and taped lectures, it's mystifying. And Church policies such as disconnection are so twisted it's unbelievable. Beyond that, this religion is about 54 years old. It is new. It was violently attacked in he 50's by the AMA and APA because Dianetics cut across some very heavy vested interested. The decades of change to more natural medicine and approaches proves the point. Even chiropractic was vilified. Some of the Church's early policies likely attempted to react to those attacks. And some of the early actions were probably unsound. But we're talking decades ago. This is not the Church that I see now. If someone breaks the law, they should be subject to the judicial system. We are a country of laws. As a matter of fact, Hubbard's writings heavily support this. Be that as it may, the few Church members that broke the law paid for it. They were purged. Are there still abuses? Maybe but these are isolated and a very small minority, if at all. And there are two sides to every story. Here's what I know. I've been a successful computer executive for 25 years. (I do not work for the Church). I have experienced an entirely new level of happiness. My kids don't take drugs, they are productive and contributing member of society and happily married. They care about our culture, as do I. Nobody i Scientology EVER asked me to accept ANYTHING in Scientology on faith. I was asked to read, observe and see if it worked for me. It did.

I've talked to protesters. Nearly every one of them had no real clue about what Scientology is or does in reality. They've never read an intro book or even gone to the website. In the main, they were out to party. Yes there were some, and I do believe who feel they are fighting abuses. And I applaud fighting abuses. But better to put this all in context and not dwell on what happened 25 years ago. The most basic tenet of Scientology is communication. I'm betting that any ANON member wanting to talk to a C of S executive could make an appointment, go into a Church and air their grievance.

This would handle 90$ of the "beef". This doesn't mean there are not 10% or so that truly hate the Church, it's theology and membership. Those people are a different situation. Nothing would handle them as their basic intention is destructive. But then again, they have their right to believe, as long as it doesn't harm by hate.

Steve

Posted by: Steve at May 13, 2008 11:46 AM

Steve, who posted on May 13 @ 11:46AM:

You say "I'm betting that any ANON member wanting to talk to a C of S executive could make an appointment, go into a Church and air their grievance."

I have been to protests, I am Anonymous. I have stood 5 feet from $cientologists and in a normal speaking voice asked them to come over and talk to me one-on-one. You know what they have ALL done? Ignored me, not responded, pulled out a camera or video camera and begun to record or take pictures of us before going back inside.

Yeah, that's communication. Any one of them could put down the camera, come out from their private property, and then one-on-one have a discussion and debate us protesting the actions of their organization. They don't, and that speaks volumes. And I'm not talking about low level individuals who may just be there for courses, I'm talking people who are in suits and telling other people what to do and running the show. None of them will talk to us even though over and over we've asked for it.

When Hemet Base is open to the public.
When Clearwater, FL is loosened from their grasp.
When the Freewinds is free from asbestos.
When $cientology's religious documents are no longer COPYRIGHTED and are free to be viewed by anyone.
When auditing, clear, and the OT levels are FREE like any religion's process of salvation SHOULD BE.

Then, maybe then you've got something worthwhile. Until then, they are a scam, they are a cult, they are a CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION.

XENU BLESS YOU VILLAGE VOICE!! ANONYMOUS LOVES YOU!!!

Posted by: Anonymous at May 13, 2008 12:50 PM

Steve,

"Here's what I know. I've been a successful computer executive for 25 years. (I do not work for the Church). I have experienced an entirely new level of happiness. My kids don't take drugs, they are productive and contributing member of society and happily married. They care about our culture, as do I."

First of all I'd like to say I respect this and am happy for you. I'd like to put this at the beginning of this posting, because written later it will probably, sadly appear hypocritic. I assure you, it's not and from what I gather most of the current critics of Scientology don't think scientologists are evil or some such. I guess a lot of us believe the happiness is really artificial, but that's not for us to judge. Just like trying to get rid of engrams to reach the state of Clear is nothing that anyone criticizes. There are of course those that make fun of it, but then they exist for any system of belief or any political point of view for that matter. In the following posting I will probably write some things and utter positions that you will either find misinformed, shallow or worse. If I believed Scientology to be true I would without a doubt believe this to be the case, that's why I belief you will too. But whats important for me to convey is this: That this is not a contradiction to what I write in this first paragraph. My problem lies with the organization, not with its members. On the other hand, I understand if for members an attack on the organization on this scale is being regarded as an attack on themselves.

I agree that gossip columns are not the sources to go for when wnating to find out about Scientology's ideas and that for this purpose primary material is better. Of course truth may also be found on ocassion in a gossip column, but that's another story...

There are a lot of Hubbard quotes around from books which to me sound rather frightening, I'll give you just one -admittedly extreme, but not completely out of character from my perception- example of what I read so you may gather an impression, this is not meant to attack, but to explain how people get a negative impression:

"The sudden and abrupt deletion of all individuals occupying the lower bands of the tone scale from the social order would result in an almost instant rise in the cultural tone and would interrupt the dwindling spiral into which any society may have entered."
(Hubbard, Science of Survival)

This honestly frightens me. Ok, one may say, this is long ago, but from what I gather Hubbard's words don't have a date of expiration in Scientology he's very much revered.

"Some of the Church's early policies likely attempted to react to those attacks. And some of the early actions were probably unsound. But we're talking decades ago. This is not the Church that I see now."

And in this we differ. If there had been nothing of that sort after op snowwhite i might be inclined to agree, i would say: ok, that was bad, but it got busted by the FBI, the GO was disbanded, people went to prison and it won't happen again.
The following may once more appear to be an attack, but how else can I support my point of view? It's true that some of the people responsible for things like Operation Snow White were brought to justice and that GO was dismantled. But if one takes a look at what happened in greece and what was found in the searches by police (prepared dossiers on politicians and famous people, a confidential military map, a report that the CIA had allegedly intervened on behalf of Scientology in closing a so-called "cult-monitoring" department of a greek agency) also a document which seems to indicate the post of a chief of "Snow White Programs" after 1990, I have a hard time believing there has been any change. There are scans of these documents:

http://www.unchain.gr/seizeddocs.html

In addition to this, GO is gone, but OSA has taken its place.

Also, when I read reports about high-ranking Scientology executives being held in a room for years at gold base and there are affidavits and reports of David Miscavige physically attacking people, I'm also skeptical. Especially considering that while these people may hold a grudge against Scientology and so may have reasons to invent stories, they also risk being sued to eternity should these claims be false. And worse, should they state it in court, which they declare themselves to be ready for by filing an affidavit.

Of course the quotation in the book may be fake and the author of the greek page may have created fake Scientology documents because he is a religious bigot or for other reasons and the reports about Miscavige getting violent and about "SP-Hall" may be fabrications, but I don't think this is very probable. You may say: But using Ockham's razor, is it not more probable that there is a huge conspiracy theory with extreme claims about Scientology than an actual conspiracy by Scientology, like antisemitism where there are claims of a huge jewish conpiracy? I would likely agree and I was _very_ skeptical when I heard first about the claims against Scientology, but I have read so many material on the internet, so many quotations from parliamentary commissions, judges and journalists...

"I'm betting that any ANON member wanting to talk to a C of S executive could make an appointment, go into a Church and air their grievance."

There are several difficulties/answers with this proposal. One is that most of the people will be afraid of this because they don't want to reveal their identity (because of what they heard about the fair game policy).
The second thing is that this or equivalents of this have taken place in several instances. There have been several long discussions between Scientologists and anonymous, even if most of them didn't take place in an Org. From what I heard the outcome wasn't very productive most of the time. The Scientologists involved seemed to be of the opinion that either these people are haters, uninformed or being paid by the pharmaceutic industry and anonymous on the other hand didn't feel that their questions were answered and that they were just countered by PR.
Another reason why people are hesitant to use a more open approach towards Scientology is imo the way PIs and lawyers letters have been sent to perceived members of anonymous and participants in protests. Also there have been some instances of strange phonecalls. This is another reason why its hard to believe "fair game" would be a thing of the past. The other reason is that the supposed cancellation says it would not apply to SPs. Of course, anonymous having declared "war" against the church isn't exactly furthering a "constructive atmosphere" either, as well as prank calls and DDOS. It may even have been legally justified to demand the takedown of the Tom Cruise video. But it is important to understand that this was just the final straw. Around 1990 there was a first "war" between part of the Internet and Scientology and in the course of this conflict, Scientology lawyers demanded the takedown of a usenet group. This went against the very spirit of the Internet. Also, when google for a time removed the results pointing to the critical site xenu.net when searching for "Scientology". It may seem absurd to some Scientologists, but in a way these are -perceived to be- defensive actions.

"If someone breaks the law, they should be subject to the judicial system. We are a country of laws."

I agree. But then there is this alleged quote from an alleged list of "errors, misdemeanors, crimes and high crimes" by LRH. Once more, its only an alleged quote, I dont have confirmation and the source is a critical newsgroup, but it may serve as another example why a lot of people are skeptical of Scientology when they inform themselves on the internet.

"161) Reporting or threatening to report Scientology or Scientologists to civil authorities in an effort to suppress Scientology or Scientologists from practicing or receiving standard Scientology."

questions that people ask themselves should they believe the "high crimes" quotation: Seems fair enough, but what if "fair game" would be regarded standard policy? Or the running of a RPF? Or when people work for really low wages very long in the Sea Org? Does this mean it's a high crime to report such things to authorities?

" But then again, they have their right to believe, as long as it doesn't harm by hate."

I'm glad you're of this opinion, even though I personally don't think it is a question of believe (or of hate for that matter, at least it should not be) but rather of facts and proof.

Posted by: reader at May 13, 2008 1:03 PM

I Thanks for covering this!
SO sayeth Suburbananonymom

Posted by: Amanda at May 13, 2008 2:57 PM

"Nobody i Scientology EVER asked me to accept ANYTHING in Scientology on faith. I was asked to read, observe and see if it worked for me. It did."

Then why the fear of setting up independent scientific reviews of the "win" claims Scientology makes? For instance, the spiking of IQ points claim? Or how about the ability to control matter, space, energy and time?


Posted by: anon at May 13, 2008 3:00 PM

Freedom of Religion. When you attack the religious beliefs of one group or another you are attacking the very core of humanity. Whether you are an atheist, Muslim, Jew, Christian you have the right to practice your religion as you see fit. Attacks upon a religion is something which has been going on for a while now and coincidently? our society has been on a steady decline as well. Scientology's main purpose, the only reason it exists is to help people. When you attack a group with that purpose it speaks volumes of your own intentions and your motives.

Posted by: Thetan oNe at May 13, 2008 5:51 PM

"Scientology's main purpose, the only reason it exists is to help people."

I disagree. What you say is probably the motivation by most of the members, but in my opinion it's neither the reason Scientology was founded nor what it does as an organization.

Posted by: reader at May 13, 2008 6:17 PM

Only problem with that comment "Thetan oNe"...Scientology is NOT a religion. Period.

Posted by: at May 13, 2008 6:40 PM

For more information on the "Church" of $cientology and it's lies, please check out:

exscientologykids.com

xenu.net

enturbulation.org

whyweprotest.net

youfoundthecard.com

Google:

Operation Snow White

Fair Game Policy

Lisa McPherson

Child Abuse in Sea Org

Posted by: David Mudkips at May 13, 2008 6:41 PM

Thank you Village Voice.
Thank you Mike Vitale.
Thank you Anonymous.

But especially 'thank you' to all the $cn critics who have been doing this and doing this and doing this. For years. With great courage. And some of them, like Paulette Cooper, have lost almost everything because of their willingness to stop this abusive cult. I applaud Jason Beghe for leaving and for speaking out so eloquently. But he has nothing to fear from the co$. Not now. Now that all the work has been done.

Co$ has nothing but foot-bullets left.
They're failing.

And for the 2millionth time: No one is attacking $cientologist's beliefs. But lots of us are attacking the practices and policies of this abusive organization. Period.

Posted by: gargy at May 13, 2008 7:02 PM

NO, I'M SPORTACUS!

Dangerous Cult is Dangerous, amirite?

Posted by: Joreal at May 13, 2008 10:49 PM

@reader and other anons here: Scientology exists to help people. Think what you want, but you don't know the theology or anti-drug or literacy programs or their effectiveness. And to anon's foolishness about any religion submitting to "tests", would you put any Catholic or jew to the test if they claimed miracles. Your basis of rationale all comes from the misinformation and propaganda in circulating in your own blogs. Here's a fact I do know: The protest in CW this month had 38 people. Every protest is dying out because hatred and intentions to harm and destroy something will never win in the end. That is your motivation and it's a sad comment on our culture as a whole. Kids that should be protesting a war or rampant drug abuse in our schools, or the failings of the public school system or Darfur or the many true ills are hell-bent on attacking an organization that is passionately providing help.

Posted by: Steve at May 14, 2008 12:32 AM

It's about time these scientology DORKS get what's coming to them for BRAINWASHING trusting folks. scientology is just like any OTHER CULT: an EMBARRASSMENT to the human race.

I mean, come ON..L. Ron Hubbard sincerely believed that tomatoes and other vegetables can FEEL PAIN and scream when cut. What kind of nutjob was he, anyway?

I've never studied scientology (don't correct me for not capitalizing their name..it deserves NO capitalization)and never will, just like I don't care to study ANY organized, man-made religion.

Man-made religion is just another excuse for some power-hungry mongrel S.O.B to molest children, steal your money, and make women feel like trash. Yes, JUST like all of the televangelists who CLAIM they have "special" "connections" to Jesus Christ. They are nothing but charlatans, JUST like the "religion" of scientology.

I believe in a "higher" power: I believe in Jesus Christ. But, what I DO NOT believe in, is ANYONE who sees him or herself above ANYONE else, I don't give a DAMN if you're christian, Islamic, Buddhist, or whatever. No one has the right to play God..not me, not you, nor anyone else.

scientology is a scam, a LIE, and I could care LESS if they try to come and "audit" (laughs derisively at the IDEA of scientology's "audits") ME.

To close: Those of you on the "frontlines" out there: Kudos to you. Those of you who are ex-scientologists, you deserve a pat on the back for leaving that RIDICULOUS and EMPTY "religion". It's not a religion..it's legalized brainwashing is what it is. I hope and PRAY that more of you avoid sceintology for what it REALLY is: A festering, pus-filled sore that needs to be excised and burned to the core.

Posted by: Todd H. at May 14, 2008 5:00 AM

Thank you VV! (one of those has to be for Vendetta!) The Voice has the brass balls to cover what the mainstream media ignore--a grassroots, global, growing protest against the oppressive practices and crimes of CoS--the Corporation of Scientology. Expect us! We are not going away.

Because we are leaderless we cannot be stopped.

Because we are legion we will never go away.

We do not forgive. We do not forget. We are Anonymous.

Posted by: Elron Dullard at May 14, 2008 9:03 AM

Perhaps the slight decline in the protests had nothing to do with the majority of Anon's being of college age and participating in finals. Perhaps the slight decline had nothing to do with Mother's day and the fact that many anon's were travelling to see Mom. It could be that after 4 protests some have become bored.

We didn't chose this fight, this fight chose us...or do you not remember how this started?

Many scientologists may believe that they are helping people, but the truth says otherwise. Good intentions do not negate adverse results. I empathise with the rank and file, but the orginaziation is a rabid dog and needs to be put down.

Posted by: Anon at May 14, 2008 9:39 AM

@ Steve

"Here's a fact I do know: The protest in CW this month had 38 people."

Here's the funny thing Steve, unlike scientology anonymous is not obsessed with stats. Who cares that the monthly protest had around 40 people? Most orgs are getting hit with weekly, if not daily flash raids.

The big protests, those are just to show that anon isn't going anywhere.

On the subject of numbers, 1 anon in England has managed to shut down a stress test cart on a near daily basis alone. So whether it's 1, 40, 100 or over 9000 know that anything scientology does, someone is watching.

Back to my main point though, numbers do not matter. Awareness matters. Since April 12 we've had:

- Jenna Hill & Astra Woodcraft of exscientologykids.com on ABC Nightline

- Tommy Davis getting called out nationally on CNN about lying in regards to death threats/bomb threats that scientology claims anonymous made. I believe the quote was "we checked with the FBI and they said there is nothing to link anonymous to the claims you are making. At this time the FBI believes no charges will be laid against anonymous. Also he just generally looked like shit. The regular viewer knows he lied.

- Freewinds sealed due to Blue Asbestos which the Panamanian government is investigating based on statements made in Lawrence Woodcraft's affidavit stating management knew of the danger in 1987 and did nothing about it.

- Norway pushing hard against scientology due to a MPs daughter committing suicide after doing a "personality test"

- Belgium raiding and closing down a scientology org and charging scientology with fraud as well as other charges

Those are just a few of the things that have happened in the past month to bring awareness to Scientology management's actions. So who cares about the number of people at a protest. Governments and mass media are starting to turn a critical eye to scientology and they aren't liking what they see.

"Kids that should be protesting a war or rampant drug abuse in our schools, or the failings of the public school system or Darfur or the many true ills are hell-bent on attacking an organization that is passionately providing help."

1) That's a pretty bold statement. Anonymous has members for 16-80. I doubt they like being called kids.

Also, how do you know that people in Anonymous don't also protest the things you're talking about? Oh, that's right, you don't, so don't generalize. Our lives are not dictated to us by the actions of scientology. We are free to make choices as to what and where we direct our energy. To make the assumption that people involved with anonymous are not also involved in other activities just shows how ignorant you really are.

Anonymous doesn't claim that the base scientologist are out to hurt people. We acknowledge that in general the followers of scientology are trying to help. Our issues are with the management, and the practices that cause harm.

2) As for scientology "passionately providing help" I give you this link:

http://www.wikileaks.org/leak/cos-organization-1/fo-3434-rb-rpf-1974.pdf

That's the document that outlines how the RPF prison camps are to be run. I'm sure though that saying stuff like "The RPF member has no liberties" is meant to be helpful though, correct?

Posted by: User Name at May 14, 2008 9:40 AM

Seems to me Steve, you are clinging to what your OSA plants are telling you to say.

Scientology's claims are dubious at best and they are trying to smear legitimate protests because they can not handle criticisms. Both Judaism and Christianity and Islam and other religions have been criticized in the past yet they don't make up lies to silence their critics. Poor Paulette Cooper was driven to the point of bankruptcy because of Scientology.

Or to turn it around on you, why do you hate freedom? Why do you hate freedom of speech? Are you afraid the secrets of the church coming out and pointing out the many flaws of ones church.

Religion should be strengthened by criticisms.

Posted by: A non a moose at May 14, 2008 10:07 AM

Ah, so we should ignore all the brainwashing, the evil operations, the slave labour and the extortion, because there are other bad things in the world?

No.

Your cult is causing people misery, is breaking up families and is ruthless in trying to damage its critics.

Anonymous can expose this. It can help to show the world what an evil organisation you are. I don't care about your actual beliefs, be they intermingled with other religions, or be they in L. Ron Hubbard's drug addled ramblings about "Trillions of years ago"

I care about what your organization does to real people, and the way it operates.

We will not stop- have no fear. Numbers will fluctuate, but those whom have been attacked for criticising your cult- they now have support. They have man power, free thinkers to stand alongside the long harassed critics.

Posted by: Anon at May 14, 2008 10:22 AM

Think what you want, but you don't know the theology or anti-drug or literacy programs or their effectiveness.

On the contrary, I think a majority of Anon knows the "theology" pretty well. Also, with the sworn affidavit of high ranking ex-Scn Larry Brennan, we see it for what it is: religious cloaking.

As for the anti-drug program, I can only assume you mean Narconon. All you have to do is google Narconon to find out how effective it is. That aside, though, if you believe really don't know the "effectiveness", that's the point the other Anon was making about submitting to peer reviewed testing. Would you undergo any new treatment whose only testimony was from the ones that developed it? I wouldn't. But, then again, I'm not a sucker.

I can't speak for your literacy programs and can only assume you mean Applied Scholastics which has been denied from a majority of the school boards it's been presented to.

Your basis of rationale all comes from the misinformation and propaganda in circulating in your own blogs.

Or it comes from sworn testimony/affidavits and first hand accounts from ex members...or the massive amount of leaked documents including OT levels, policy letters, and sekrit LEAF projeks. I'd say we have a pretty good basis of information to go off of.

Here's a fact I do know: The protest in CW this month had 38 people. Every protest is dying out because hatred and intentions to harm and destroy something will never win in the end.

Protest numbers were down partly because of finals and, yes, partly because of dwindling interest. However, flash raids have picked up. The cult of the CoS is dying "because hatred and intentions to harm and destroy something will never win in the end". You really should read Larry Brennan's affidavit.

an organization that is passionately providing help.

That's what you're meant to believe. Meanwhile your higher ups are going on cruises and honeymoons with celebrities. Meanwhile, you get a healthy dose of asbestos, RPF, and disconnection.

Sure, you may be doing good things out there. But, have you ever stopped and questioned the motives of these good deeds. If you were a criminal organization in the guise of religion would you go around stating you were? Or, would you put every effort into appearing like the charitable organization you claimed to be? It's all PR, my friend. And you've fallen for it. We're be here to welcome you when you blow or the whole thing collapses.

Posted by: Anon, Anon, My Boyfriend's Back! at May 14, 2008 2:09 PM

GREAT article and awesome pictures! Keep up the good work Anonymous!!

Posted by: Dyna at May 14, 2008 3:29 PM

Epic article!!

See you on June 12th guys!!

Posted by: GerAnonymous at May 14, 2008 7:21 PM

I never expected to see Anons going unmasked, but I suppose I should have seen it coming. "Nothing to lose" and all that.

Posted by: Blayze at May 15, 2008 4:07 AM

One particular bit of revealed wisdom by L. Ron Hubbard should be enough to give anyone pause:

"Around this time [LRH] was invited to address a science fiction group in Newark hosted by the writer, Sam Moskowitz. `Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous,' he told the meeting. `If a man really wanted to make a million dollars, the best way to do it would be start his own religion.'"
- from LA Times, 27 Aug 78. Cited in Bare Faced Messiah.

Posted by: melior at May 15, 2008 5:46 AM

Unmasked "anonymous" LOL!! You have failed, couldn't you see this from the start?

Posted by: Outonymous at May 15, 2008 2:40 PM

Oh god. I laughed. Hard.

Posted by: Bob at May 16, 2008 6:39 PM

Religion? Are constitution protects freedom of speech! Read the 1st amendment! I have every right to speak out or oppose anything I choose, that’s called Freedom of speech! What's the point of Freedom if you can't voice opposition? When a church takes extreme measures to silence its critics, they lose their rights.

Posted by: RONPAUL2008 at May 16, 2008 7:46 PM

Hi Steve.

Welcome to being wrong:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbZh5sejqHw

Enjoy your fail.

Posted by: Mike Vitale at May 27, 2008 2:01 PM

“We Never forget.
We can’t dance.
We caused the government to regulate the internet.”

Thanks boys.

Posted by: Anonymous at July 10, 2008 8:27 PM

post a comment



Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)
 
Three best things to do in New York on
Friday, July 25