Daily Voice «

update notifications

email

subscribe
unsubscribe

categories

Things I Learned Watching Shine a Light

Posted by Tom Breihan at 3:36 PM, April 17, 2008

ShineALight2.jpg
Or, you know, don't

The last time the Rolling Stones made an IMAX concert movie, it was 1991 and I was 12 years old. For reasons I can't quite remember, I wanted to go see Live at the Max, but my dad rebuffed me thusly: "I don't want some bearded biker to hit me over the head with a chain and steal my wallet." What do you say to that? To this day, I'm still not entirely certain whether my dad really thought a second Altamont was going to break out in the same theater where we saw To Fly like fifty bazillion times or whether he just really, really didn't want to go.

There were times during Shine a Light, the Stones new IMAX concert movie, when I wished a bearded biker would hit me over the head with a chain and steal my wallet, if only because then I'd have a valid excuse to leave the theater. Remember that shot in Gimme Shelter where Keith prances around out of focus in the foreground while a Hitlerian Hell's Angel, standing on the side of the stage, stares at him with utter contempt? I felt sort of like that guy throughout Shine a Light. Unfortunately, there were only like seven other people in the theater, and none of them were thieving bikers, so I didn't get lumped up. I did, however, learn some things. Like these:

- If you want to go see a movie at the Union Square multiplex at noon on a Thursday, it'll now cost you $11.75. What the hell is that?

- The next time Martin Scorsese makes a concert movie, he should maybe consider not putting himself in front of his own camera. In The Last Waltz, he's a weaselly hanger-on, laughing at all Robbie Robertson's jokes. In Shine a Light, he's a stammering nebbish, which I suppose is some sort of improvement. The first twenty minutes of Shine a Light work as a making-of featurette for the movie we're about to watch. We see Scorsese rushing all around, interrogating light people, begging the band's people for a list of songs they're going to play. None of this particularly rivets. Throughout, I impatiently waited for the real show to begin. When it began, I missed the making-of stuff.

- Shine a Light documents two shows the band played at the Beacon Theater last year, apparently benefits for Bill Clinton's foundation. The Clintons show up in the beginning, making small talk with the band, and everyone either looks tired or uncomfortable. The intense revulsion I feel whenever a Clinton shows up onscreen is an entirely new thing, something I haven't experienced outside of TV news. I wonder whether it'll fade eventually or whether I'll just never be able to watch Contact again.

- Hillary, just like an asshole, keeps everyone waiting for her mom to show up to the meet and greet.

- Shine a Light might be a Scorsese movie, but it's not a Scorsese Movie. I'm at a loss to explain how someone who's used Stones tracks so iconically in his other movies and who filmed the Band so elegiacally in The Last Waltz could become so hamfisted when it came time to film the Stones themselves. Like most dilettantish movie dorks, I consider Scorsese to be probably our greatest living director, but anyone could've filmed these concert scenes, and I can think of a few people who would've done it a lot better. Here, he films the band in a series of tight close-ups, cutting them all up into a choppy, arrhythmic blur. Scorsese seems boxed in by the relative intimacy of the Beacon, and I get the impression he would've been better off taping one of the Stones' usual stadium-shows; at least then he'd have some space to move the camera. If anything, the clumsy visuals here actually take away from the music. The concert in that Hannah Montana 3D movie was more fluidly captured.

- Every once in a while, we get an old clip of the 60s or 70s Stones cheekily dodging interviewers' questions, and I'd love to see Scorsese turn all these into a documentary, the way he did with Bob Dylan in No Direction Home. In this context, though, the clips serve to turn this movie into a weird and impenetrable statement about aging. It's meant to inspire, I suppose, that the Stones are all limber enough at their ages to hold a stage down the way they do here. For plenty of viewers, I'm sure it does inspire. But for someone who was two years old the last time the band scored an honest-to-God hit, it's a bit depressing to see these leathery old guys running one more time through a schtick they've been hammering into the ground for decades. Jagger is now less a stage presence than a bundle of familiar theatrical tics: the pursed lips, the stuttered exclamations, the convulsive full-body shimmy where he explodes forward or backward across the stage. His greasy slither was incendiary once upon a time, but he's essentially been doing an impression of himself for so long that I can' remember ever seeing one of those blown-back limb-spasms that seemed spontaneous.

- Still, we're not talking about Aerosmith or Elton John or any of the other relics currently cluttering up the arena-tour circuit. Unlike those guys, the Stones were once really, really great, and they still pack the songs to prove it. Repetition has rendered some of those songs effectively meaningless; I never need to hear "Satisfaction" or "Jumpin' Jack Flash" again. But when they launch into something like "Some Girls" and dial down the schtick, they can still sort of crush.

- Keith Richards starts out jowly and catatonic, but by the time the movie reaches its halfway point, he's got some of that old sly mischief back in his eyes. By the time he steps to the mic for a couple of songs late in the movie, he's all cackling libertine charisma, and I'm wishing he would've spent the whole night singing and given Jagger a break.

- It might be interesting to see what would happen if the four remaining Stones played a show without a battalion of session-musicians filling in the blanks behind them.

- A few guests show up onstage. Christina Aguilera plays an able Turneresque foil to Jagger, while Jack White looks a bit sheepish and nervous. The person who walks away from the whole movie smelling best is Buddy Guy. For one long moment, Guy stares silently and menacingly at the camera before he begins singing, and Scorsese, for once, doesn't cut away. Charlie Watts, with his dapper restraint, has something of that authority, and Richards shows brief sparks of it. Jagger could have it, too, but he'd rather play a cartoon version of his younger self.

- When the Stones play "Sympathy for the Devil" in Gimme Shelter, someone gets stabbed to death. When they play it in Shine a Light, someone holds a vanity Stones license plate up to the camera. I guess the license plate thing is, all things considered, preferable. But I can't say I'm happy about either one.

- Zach went too.

Voice review: Camille Dodero on Shine a Light
Voice review: Laura Sinagra on the Rolling Stones' A Bigger Bang

comments

Dude gets stabbed in GIMME SHELTER when they're playing UNDER MY THUMB, not SFTD.

Posted by: saliva glander5000 at April 17, 2008 4:20 PM

The Beacon shows took place in 2006, not last year.

Posted by: Fact-checker at April 17, 2008 5:53 PM

Once I heard a comedian joke that if you cremated Keith Richards' body when he dies the resulting fumes would burn another hole in the ozone layer. The question you really have to ask yourself is who looks more like an elderly geezer chimp? Mick Jagger or Steven Tyler from Aerosmith. I think it's a toss-up.

Posted by: Panthro at April 17, 2008 7:09 PM

Great summation of why, as a Stones fan, I am leery of watching this film.
I'm 40 and didn't get a chance to see the stones live at their 69, 72 peak, but I do remember the nasty swagger of Some Girls in 78.
I know what the Stones have been - I'm not sure I want to watch them PRETEND to be that now.
Like you, I was hoping Scorsese would go the Dylan route,
collecting those old interviews when their arrogance and comtempt was palpable....he could have pieced together a collective portrait of what the Stones were to show a new generation.
Scorsese blew it.

Posted by: Yvette at April 17, 2008 10:47 PM

Having just seen the film twice - I needed to do that to check how good it was, you have to take it for what it is. Those guys reach across all age divisions with their music. I took one person with me who wasn't a great fan when she went in but she turned that night. I have seen the Stones on a number of occasions and the one thing that always impresses me is the honesty and energy they put into their performance, reminiscent of the Boss himself. Long live Rock and Roll, the Stones and NNN.

Posted by: Tony M at April 18, 2008 6:43 AM

i'd like to hear more from your dad - it sounds like he has his head screwed on.

what does he think of lil' wayne?

Posted by: Ass Hat at April 18, 2008 6:46 AM

The only Stones movie worth watching is Cocksucker Blues, a great film. And what's with all the Clinton hate? You aren't another bloody Obamabot are you?

Posted by: DaHata at April 18, 2008 9:43 AM

if you just want to listen to the music without looking at the withered old dudes you can hear the album online at imeem.com (everyone's favorite 'youtube for music')

http://www.imeem.com/therollingstones/

Posted by: Chain Man at April 18, 2008 11:20 AM

I saw "Shine" at an Imax theater in Seattle last Sunday, right after the EMP Pop Music conference ended. Sold-out house and a very enthusiastic audience, including me. In fact I enjoyed the flick much more than I expected. I thought the Stones played better than I've ever heard, tighter and more adept but never slick. They're still just a funky little blues and rock'n roll combo. (And there's no "squadron" of back-up players, just 3 singers and a horn section.) Whatever else you can say about them, they are most definitely not going through the motions. They rock like crazy, and Charlie Watts drives the band as powerfully as he's ever done, though you can plainly see that his barnstorming work on "All Down the Line" took a lot out of him. Other high points include "She was Hot" (Lisa Fisher kills on that one), the Richards-Wood duet on "You Got the Silver," and of course "Champage & Reefer" with Buddy Guy, which is fucking wicked.

Posted by: GiorgioNYC at April 18, 2008 12:10 PM

Nice dig on Aerosmith or Elton John. Really showing your age, err, ignorance. Well, both really.

Posted by: at April 18, 2008 3:45 PM

Being 50, and considering the Stones was the first concert I ever saw in Madison Square Garden more than 34 years ago, I was not disappointed by the IMAX film. Knowing how I feel at this age, I find it phenomenal that the remaining Stones performed as they did. Could I do what I did 30 years ago, and as well? I think not. Mick Jagger is definitely a legend. Buddy Guy as well. The reviewer here is too young to appreciate the talent he saw. He must have been looking at the aging faces.

Us 50 plusses were considerably impressed. And Marty did an excellent job, as always. Yvette, who is 40 and afraid to watch the film, do not be. If you are truly a fan, you will not be disappointed. Just keep an open mind about aging (we all are going there) and appearances, and you will see the same Stones you always did. The music has not changed.

Posted by: Suzy at April 18, 2008 8:38 PM

I bet you like U2. That would explain a lot. You have to be a true Stones fan, and you would get it. I am only 35, but have seen them for four different tours. It's the ENERGY that moves people. Not a MOVIE or documentary.

Posted by: Ari at April 19, 2008 9:01 PM

Cracks me up eveytime some idiot tries to review a Stones show who does not get them. Poor fool. The music is outstanding and the film is very entertaining..it IS the Rolling Stones.

Posted by: russ at April 20, 2008 3:48 AM

No, the review is on point. In Mick Jagger's left brain decision to not stop moving during a show, no matter how out of context, meaningless or tiresome it becomes, he sells his eternal youth right into the ground.
Seeing them play at the Hollywood Bowl 2 years ago was a bit of a relief, as the overselling was reduced and the band edged carefully back to a human and not necessarily hits loaded set list.

Posted by: mick taylor's' liver at April 20, 2008 3:12 PM

"And what's with all the Clinton hate?"
-DaHata

Your handle is DaHata. Can I pull a Marlon Brando and type this reply lying down? Should I just let it pass? What's the play here?

Posted by: ondioline at April 21, 2008 12:13 PM

Nice post Tom. In my long tenure as a lurker, you've introduced me to two important things: The Re-Up Gang and Gimme Shelter.
Thousands of words for those two discoveries; it was worth the reading.
Keep on inventing those adjectives, we'll keep reading!

Posted by: zpinz at April 23, 2008 11:36 AM

My favorite part of SHINE A LIGHT is when Joe Pesci and Robert DeNiro savagely pummel the catering manager. They weren't portraying characters or nothing, they were just there at the show.

Posted by: Billy Bags at May 13, 2008 2:48 AM

If you don't get the Stones don't go to the movie let alone try to write a review.

Shine a Light is brilliant. I have seen the stone 9 times and traveled across 3 continents to do so. That concert was like playing the riff or singing the chorus yourself (even down to Mick's fillings.)
"Get off of my cloud"

Posted by: Pedders at July 22, 2008 7:12 AM

What may be hard to appreciate in Jagger's "caricature of himself" when watching a film with such intimate close ups is that his mannerisms and gestures are meant not for the people in the first five rows but the people in the last five rows.

Like the "shouting" and heavy make-up in opera, Jagger is theatrical by necessity.

It's a rock concert. You seem to miss this rather essential point in your review.

Posted by: AC at August 24, 2008 7:20 AM

post a comment



Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)
 
Three best things to do in New York on
Saturday, October 11